- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Reintegration of StringSocket
by Damien Cassou June 18, 2008

June 18, 2008

Hi, StringSocket is a class part of Nebraska. You removed that class. However, Universe uses this class to publish packages. Is it possible to reintegrate this class, at least partially to support Universe? Bye -- Damien Cassou Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

5 8

[Pharo-project] New pharo-dev based on latest version
by Damien Cassou June 17, 2008

June 17, 2008

I've just published a new pharo-dev version on: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Downloads?tm=2. It is based on version 10041 which contains cleaning of MVC. -- Damien Cassou Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

2 1

[Pharo-project] [ANN] MVC removal step two harvested
by StÃ©phane Ducasse June 17, 2008

June 17, 2008

Hi all I harvested the changes proposed by alain for the removal of MVC. Please test pharo since it was a large change. stef

2 2

[Pharo-project] ObjectFinalizerTests understanding problems
by Norbert Hartl June 17, 2008

June 17, 2008

Before I recognized that Adrian fixed the ObjectFinalizerTests>>testFinalizationOfEquals I gave it try myself. I came to the same conclusion as Adrian how to fix. But now after knowing how it works I do not know why the test succeeds :) The test uses 1 to: 5 do: [:n | o := Object new. bag add: n. o toFinalizeSend: #remove: to: bag with: n]. 1 to: 5 do: [:n | o := Object new. bag add: n. o toFinalizeSend: #remove: to: bag with: n]. My problem is that toFinalizeSend:to:with adds an Objectfinalizer to the finalizationRegistry of the instance. But Object>>finalizationRegistry "Answer the finalization registry associated with the receiver." ^WeakRegistry default returns a global object which is WeakKeyDictionary. And | d | d := WeakKeyDictionary new. d at: (1 asString copy) put: $a. d at: (1 asString copy) put: $b. d size prints 1. To me that would exchange every entry from the first run by the second run (because the objects are equal). So I would assume that if there does not happen a run of the garbagecollector between the two loops the objects of the first loop should be still contained in the bag. But the test is named finalizationOfEquals so I have to assume: self doesNotUnderstand Can someone explain it to me, please? Norbert

3 4

[Pharo-project] Fwd: [Seaside] Timespan bug
by StÃ©phane Ducasse June 17, 2008

June 17, 2008

Begin forwarded message: > From: "David T. Lewis" <lewis(a)mail.msen.com> > Date: June 17, 2008 2:50:58 AM CEDT > To: Seaside - general discussion <seaside(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org> > Subject: Re: [Seaside] Timespan bug > Reply-To: Seaside - general discussion <seaside(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 01:50:43PM +1000, Steve Aldred wrote: >> Sorry for posting this here but I don't use Squeak itself and hence >> aren't on the main squeak list. >> >> As a VW Seaside user I do use Squeak extensions. There is a bug in >> Timespan as shown below: >> >> (Year starting: (DateAndTime year: 2008 month: 1 day:1)) previous >> >> The result should be 2007 but it returns 2006. >> >> Year should implement previous the same as Month does. > > Steve, > > Thanks for reporting this issue. I was going to enter a report on your > behalf in the Squeak bug tracking system, but it looks like Brent is > already on top of it :) > > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7097 > > The bug report includes a proposed fix, which is straightforward if > you > want to include it in your image: > > http://bugs.squeak.org/file_download.php?file_id=3386&type=bug > > Brent's fix is as follows: > > Year>>previous > "This implementation handles leap years correctly" > ^ self class year: (self year - 1) > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > seaside(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >

1 0

[Pharo-project] Fwd: getting class variable access
by StÃ©phane Ducasse June 17, 2008

June 17, 2008

Begin forwarded message: > From: Colin Putney <cputney(a)wiresong.ca> > Date: June 16, 2008 12:08:33 AM CEDT > To: OmniBrowser developers <ob-dev(a)wiresong.ca> > Subject: Re: getting class variable access > Reply-To: OmniBrowser developers <ob-dev(a)wiresong.ca> > > > On 15-Jun-08, at 11:57 AM, stephane ducasse wrote: > >> still having good name in the registration would help because OB >> adaptor sucks > > Agreed. Unfortunately, the registration mechanism doesn't let you > choose the name displayed in the menu. It just uses the name of the > class being registered. Also, the protocol expected by the > registration mechanism is particularly twisted, which is why I had to > create a separate class for it, instead of using OBSystemBrowser > directly. > > Colin > _______________________________________________ > ob-dev mailing list > ob-dev(a)wiresong.ca > http://mail.wiresong.ca/mailman/listinfo/ob-dev >

1 0

[Pharo-project] Namespaces?
by Michael Rueger June 16, 2008

June 16, 2008

Hi all, asking the unmentionable ;-) Are there any plans for (simple) name spaces in Pharo? Reason I'm asking is that it would make moving code between e.g. VW and Pharo easier IMHO. Michael

3 4

June 16, 2008

Hi guys I would like some other people to have a look at [Pharo-project] Hunting down nebraska [Pharo-project] MVC removal step2 investigations Can somebody have a look? Stef

4 10

June 16, 2008

Hi all if somebody wants to add a really cool feature to the debugger.... in VW we can see as intermediary variable the results of subsets of expression so we we step thru the execution we do not have to select the expression and print it all the time we can simply see the results in the variable. Stef

3 6

[Pharo-project] call for fix: fixing browser names and stupid dead navigation that works
by StÃ©phane Ducasse June 15, 2008

June 15, 2008

Hi guys I send to this list the email I sent to the great omnibrowser developer list...... Really cool features but seems to forget the basic. if it takes me more than 5 min to find something may be the interface is BAD. Stef how with the new browser can I get class Variable refs? I ask this question for OB-Shittynamebrowser and OB- shittynamepackagebrowser. Do you expect that a newbie can find his way with browser named like that? this question quite stupid question reveals that the command if there exist are far from readable for a normal programmer. Of course feel free to think that I'm an idiot. When somebody instead of inventing new features will do a real usability analysis? Stef

2 3