October 2012 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Parsing and navigating Html
by Paul DeBruicker July 16, 2020

July 16, 2020

On 12/05/2010 06:02 AM, pharo-project-request(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr wrote: > From: St?phane Ducasse<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > Subject: [Pharo-project] Parsing and navigating Html > To:"Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Development" > <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr> > Message-ID:<1C53DFD8-3021-4233-BC83-CE8C1EA8D103(a)inria.fr> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi > > I would like extract partial information from HTML pages. > So I started to play and fix HTMLParser. > > Now does anybody know alternatives? > > Second, does anybody develop a lib to query HTML structure as with the XMLSupport package? > > Stef The Soup package on SqueakSource.com works OK.

3 4

[Pharo-project] About ~= and ~~
by Clara Allende Nov. 26, 2016

Nov. 26, 2016

Hi guys, I'm wondering, why? ProtoObject>> ~~ anObject "Answer whether the receiver and the argument are not the same object (do not have the same object pointer)." self == anObject ifTrue: [^ false] ifFalse: [^ true] Instead of: ProtoObject>> ~~ anObject "Answer whether the receiver and the argument are not the same object (do not have the same object pointer)." ^(self == anObject) not And why? Object >> ~= anObject "Answer whether the receiver and the argument do not represent the same object." ^self = anObject == false Instead of Object>> ~= anObject "Answer whether the receiver and the argument do not represent the same object." ^(self = anObject) not. Is there any particular reason for this that I'm missing? Thanks in advance! -- "*Most good programmers do programming not because they expect to get paid or get adulation by the public, but because it is fun to program.*" Linus Torvalds

12 26

[Pharo-project] Status of SmallPOS
by Stephan Eggermont Aug. 9, 2016

Aug. 9, 2016

I noticed the SmallPOS on ss3 is under MIT license. AFAIK, it was GPLv3. When did this relicensing happen? Stephan

4 8

[Pharo-project] Do we have the new primitive?? [WAS] Re: IdentitySet but using #hash rather than #identityHash ?
by Mariano Martinez Peck Dec. 16, 2015

Dec. 16, 2015

> All I can say is that I am impressed by the numbers it is really much >> faster. >> I still don't understand why I send this email with a subject say >> IdentitySet because what I really need is a fast/large IdentityDictionary >> :( Anyway, there's a place where we can use this LargeIdentitySet in Fuel >> I think). >> >> So Levente, you say this is not possible to adapt this for dictionary? >> can >> we contact Eliot to provide such a primitive? >> > > As promised, I uploaded my LargeIdentityDictionary implementation to > http://leves.web.elte.hu/**squeak/**LargeIdentityDictionary.st<http://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/LargeIdentityDictionary.st>. > The numbers will be a bit worse compared to LargeIdentitySet, because of > the lack of the primitive, but it's still 2-3x faster than other solutions > (IdentityDictionary, PluggableIdentityDictionary, subclassing, etc). I'm > about to propose this primitive with other improvements on the vm-dev list. > > Hi Eliot/Levente. What is the status of this? Do we have already the new primitive? If true, how can we adapt LargeIdentitySet to use such new primitive? Thanks! > > Levente > > >> thanks >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Levente Uzonyi <leves(a)elte.hu> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote: >>> >>> On 16.12.2011 03:26, Levente Uzonyi wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> How about my numbers? :) >>>>> >>>>> "Preallocate objects, so we won't count gc time." >>>>> n := 1000000. >>>>> objects := Array new: n streamContents: [ :stream | >>>>> n timesRepeat: [ stream nextPut: Object new ] ]. >>>>> >>>>> set := IdentitySet new: n. >>>>> Smalltalk garbageCollect. >>>>> [1 to: n do: [ :i | set add: (objects at: i) ] ] timeToRun. "4949" >>>>> >>>>> set := LargeIdentitySet new. >>>>> Smalltalk garbageCollect. >>>>> [1 to: n do: [ :i | set add: (objects at: i) ] ] timeToRun. "331" >>>>> >>>>> set := (PluggableSet new: n) >>>>> hashBlock: [ :object | object identityHash * 4096 + object class >>>>> identityHash * 64 ]; "Change this to #basicIdentityHash in Pharo" >>>>> equalBlock: [ :a :b | a == b ]; >>>>> yourself. >>>>> Smalltalk garbageCollect. >>>>> [1 to: n do: [ :i | set add: (objects at: i) ] ] timeToRun. "5511" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I also have a LargeIdentityDictionary, which is relatively fast, but >>>>> not >>>>> as fast as LargeIdentitySet, because (for some unknown reason) we don't >>>>> have a primitive that could support it. If we had a primitive like >>>>> primitive 132 which would return the index of the element if found or >>>>> 0 if >>>>> not, then we could have a really fast LargeIdentityDictionary. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Levente >>>>> >>>>> Hehe yes, if writing a version fully exploiting the limited range, >>>> that's >>>> probably the approach I would go for as well. >>>> (IAssuming it's the version at http://leves.web.elte.hu/** >>>> squeak/LargeIdentitySet.st<htt**p://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/** >>>> LargeIdentitySet.st<http://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/LargeIdentitySet.st> >>>> > >>>> ) >>>> >>>> Mariano commented in the version at http://www.squeaksource.com/** >>>> FuelExperiments <http://www.squeaksource.com/**FuelExperiments<http://www.squeaksource.com/FuelExperiments>> >>>> that it's >>>> >>>> slow for them, which I guess is due to not adopting #identityHash calls >>>> to >>>> #basicIdentityHash calls for Pharo: >>>> ((0 to: 4095) collect: [:each | each << 22 \\ 4096 ]) asSet size -> 1 >>>> So it basically uses 1 bucket instead of 4096... Whoops. :) >>>> >>>> Uploaded a new version to the MC repository which is adapted for Pharo, >>>> on the same machine my numbers were taken from, it does the same test >>>> as I >>>> used above in 871 ms. (181 with preallocation). >>>> >>>> >>> Cool. One more thing: in Squeak the method using primitive 132 directly >>> was renamed to #instVarsInclude:, so now #pointsTo: works as expected. If >>> this was also added to Pharo, then the #pointsTo: sends should be changed >>> to #instVarsInclude:, otherwise Array can be reported as included even if >>> it wasn't added. >>> I'll upload my LargeIdentityDictionary implementation to the same place >>> this evening, since it's still 2-3 factor faster than other solutionts >>> and >>> there seem to be demand for it. >>> >>> >>> Levente >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>>> Henry >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Mariano >> http://marianopeck.wordpress.**com <http://marianopeck.wordpress.com> >> >> > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

3 5

[Pharo-project] StandardFileStream size limit?
by GÃ¶ran Krampe Nov. 13, 2015

Nov. 13, 2015

Hey all! I have just added large file (chunkwise upload and download) support to Kom/Networking/Iliad in Pharo 1.4 and while testing it I tried uploading a 2.9Gb file. I haven't looked at the exact error message, and I haven't tried writing a trivial test - but the "half written" file on disk is almost EXACTLY 2Gb (2147483647) so I am wondering - do we still have a 2Gb file size limit? This is "one click 1.4" on Ubuntu 64 with ext4. regards, GÃ¶ran

7 10

[Pharo-project] RTF reader/writer
by StÃ©phane Ducasse April 8, 2015

April 8, 2015

Hi guys Do you know if there is a library somewhere in Smalltalk to deal with RTF writing/saving? Stef

7 10

Re: [Pharo-project] How to encrypt a password?
by Paul DeBruicker Nov. 22, 2013

Nov. 22, 2013

Hi Mariano, I've made a FFI library on Squeaksource that works on Linux. http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/PasswordHashingFFI-PaulDeBruicker.… You need to install the 32 bit versions of libcrypt and libxcrypt if you're using a 64 bit linux os. Using crypt can hash passwords using MD5, DES, SHA256, SHA512. Using libxcrypt can hash passwords using bcrypt. If its for a new installation use bcrypt or SHA512 to hash the passwords. bcrypt is better because its slower, and allegedly future proof. to get a hashed password use BCryptLinuxFFI bcrypt:'mypassword' to check it against a stored hash use: BCryptLinuxFFI check:'mypassword' against: storedHash

4 10

[Pharo-project] TextAttribute, TextAction and TextDoIt or TextURL: not working
by phil＠highoctane.be Nov. 6, 2013

Nov. 6, 2013

I've been investigating with text. I found things that do work like: ((Text withAll: 'foo') , (Text string: '*' attribute: (TextAnchor new anchoredMorph: EllipseMorph new)) , (Text withAll: 'bar')) asMorph openInWorld. ((Text withAll: 'foo') , (Text string: '*' attribute: (TextAnchor new anchoredMorph: ThemeIcons confirmIcon)) , (Text withAll: 'bar')) asMorph openInWorld. But doing: ((Text withAll: 'foo') , (Text string: 'some link' attribute: (TextURL new url:'http://philippeback.eu')) , (Text withAll: 'bar')) asMorph openInWorld. gives me a nice purple 'some link' bit but clicking on it fails with MessageNotUnderstood: TextURL>>actOnClick:for:in:editor: Damn! Ideas on how to tackle this? TIA Philippe Back

5 7

[Pharo-project] Issue 3015: When a test is restarted in the debugger, #tearDown and #setUp and not send
by Hernan Wilkinson Aug. 28, 2013

Aug. 28, 2013

Hi, I added a new issue (that I think it could be see as an improvement, not an issue) that is related to debugging a test case written with SUnit. The problem is that when you restart a test in the debugger (either by pressing the restart button or compiling the method again) the changes made by the test to the objects initialized in the #setUp are not rollbacked. This change sends the messages #tearDown and #setUp to the test when restarting it, therefore letting the test in the same state as when it was run in the first place. I uploaded the solution to this issue (or improvement) to pharo inbox under SLICE-Issue-3015-RestartingATestFromTheDebuggerSendsTearDownAndSetUp-HernanWilkinson.2 I hope you like it! Hernan. -- *HernÃ¡n Wilkinson Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 email: hernan.wilkinson(a)10Pines.com site: http://www.10Pines.com <http://www.10pines.com/>*

3 3

Re: [Pharo-project] Adding a statement programmatically
by Marcus Denker June 7, 2013

June 7, 2013

On Mar 8, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Noury Bouraqadi wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Did you thought about: > -using method wrappers? > -object as methods. An object o put in a method dictionary instead of some method with selector #s. When #s is looked up, o receives the message > run: selector with: args in: originalReceiver > -proxies (look at Ghost) so you introduce an indirection to perform what ever action you want before performing the actual code > -> Compile the code to an RB AST, this then has all the interfaces needed to replace nodes or add nodes. You can then pretty print it back to source. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

3 6