October 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[ann] system attraction view
by Tudor Girba Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

Hi, I built a new visualization that has two goals: 1. show how the architecture of a system is fluid rather than rigid. 2. look good and serve as advertisement device for Moose, Roassal and Pharo. A description of mainly point 1. can be found here: http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/system-attraction/ I already used it as a splash screen for a couple of presentations, and it catches the eye. The code can be found in Moose, in a separate tiny FAMIXSystemAttraction class. You can invoke it on any class group (note: it can take a long time to render for large groups). Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

6 15

Re: [Pharo-dev] [PROVENANCE INTERNET] Re: default monospaced code font
by Goubier Thierry Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

Once the correct fonts are installed, the pdf looks very different :) Revised judgement: Source code pro is not bad for a monospaced font. Source sans pro is impressive of density (9), and has this additional readability on DejaVu sans for the $l. I'll take Source Sans Pro, then. But Pharo is not seeing it in the dialog. Is that because I did a user specific install of the fonts (and not system wide) and Pharo is not checking the user-specific fonts? Thierry Le 17/10/2013 11:11, Goubier Thierry a Ã©crit : > I'll do like you because... > > I only managed to install the source code pro font so far (no default > install in ubuntu) and Pharo doesn't see it (LibreOffice does). I'll > look for the source sans pro download as well. > > (May explain the pdf issues if the fonts are not embedded in the pdf > document). > > Thierry > > Le 17/10/2013 10:57, Igor Stasenko a Ã©crit : >> ok i looked at .xlxslsx file >> at least, in google preview it looks more or less close to the truth :) >> >> and i can say that Source Sans Pro is a winner ( to my taste ). >> I like that for 'i' in it don't closes together as in 'it', comparing to >> dejavu , where it does. >> It reads very clear yet compact. >> >> On 17 October 2013 10:43, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:siguctua@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 17 October 2013 10:47, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr >> <mailto:thierry.goubier@cea.fr>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Le 17/10/2013 10:29, Igor Stasenko a Ã©crit : >> >> hmm.. i have suspicion that it is actually adobe who can't >> handle the >> font properly.. >> because in some examples for source code pro font, the >> adjacent letters >> jump onto each other. >> i don't believe it is that bad (see attached)Inline images 1 >> >> >> Adobe or the viewer? I used evince to view it, not acrobat >> reader. It may point to incorrect spacing information in Source >> Sans Pro (I have not the errors you see in Source Code Pro). >> >> Who is in charge of the Source Pro font? Which typographer? Oh, >> Adobe apparently. If they can't handle it properly... >> >> i am far from blaming adobe, just wanted to say that in my viewer it >> does not shows things >> properly, because when rendered in pharo it don't have such problems. >> >> so i cannot have decent comparison.. >> >> Thierry >> >> >> >> On 17 October 2013 09:28, Goubier Thierry >> <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr <mailto:thierry.goubier@cea.fr> >> <mailto:thierry.goubier@cea.fr >> <mailto:thierry.goubier@cea.fr>__>> wrote: >> >> Excellent, I like the comparison a lot! Thanks! >> >> My take is: >> - Unable to like Source Code Pro 9 (and it's so wide); >> - Source Sans Pro 9 has spacing issues (16r, the r is >> too close) and >> reading issues (it's the worse for the lL|i characters) >> - Source sans Pro 10 is better than 9 (but what with >> the 2x space?) >> >> Overall, I'd stay with DejaVu Sans 9 based on this >> sample. In my >> opinion, the best compromise density / readability. >> >> Thierry >> >> Le 16/10/2013 19:56, btc(a)openinworld.com >> <mailto:btc@openinworld.com> >> <mailto:btc@openinworld.com >> <mailto:btc@openinworld.com>> a Ã©crit : >> >> >> Goubier Thierry wrote: >> >> I'd be more impressed if the argument was >> helping me distinguish >> between | and l. >> >> >> Yes. It is designed to do that. Some common >> failings of >> monospaced fonts >> are noted [1] and dealt with. There comment section >> is also >> interesting. >> >> The attached PDFs are the result of getting the >> urge to compare >> a broad >> coverage of code examples (taken from "Terse Guide >> to Squeak") >> against >> three fonts: >> * DejaVu Sans 9 point >> * Source Code Pro [1] [2] 9 point >> * Source Sans Pro [3] [4] 9 point & 10 point, since >> the width of >> 10 was >> the same as the others at 9. >> Also attached is the source excel file. >> >> cheers -ben >> >> [1] >> >> http://blogs.adobe.com/____typblography/2012/09/source-____code-pro.html >> >> <http://blogs.adobe.com/__typblography/2012/09/source-__code-pro.html> >> >> >> <http://blogs.adobe.com/__typblography/2012/09/source-__code-pro.html >> >> <http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/2012/09/source-code-pro.html>> >> [2] >> >> http://sourceforge.net/____projects/sourcecodepro.adobe/____files/ >> >> <http://sourceforge.net/__projects/sourcecodepro.adobe/__files/> >> >> >> <http://sourceforge.net/__projects/sourcecodepro.adobe/__files/ >> <http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourcecodepro.adobe/files/>> >> [3] >> >> http://blogs.adobe.com/____typblography/2012/08/source-____sans-pro.html >> >> <http://blogs.adobe.com/__typblography/2012/08/source-__sans-pro.html> >> >> >> <http://blogs.adobe.com/__typblography/2012/08/source-__sans-pro.html >> >> <http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/2012/08/source-sans-pro.html>> >> [4] >> >> http://sourceforge.net/____projects/sourcesans.adobe/____postdownload?sourc… >> >> >> <http://sourceforge.net/__projects/sourcesans.adobe/__postdownload?source=dlp> >> >> >> >> >> <http://sourceforge.net/__projects/sourcesans.adobe/__postdownload?source=dlp >> >> >> <http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourcesans.adobe/postdownload?source=dlp>> >> >> >> >> I'l let you try, then :) >> >> Thierry >> >> >> >> -- >> Thierry Goubier >> CEA list >> Laboratoire des Fondations des SystÃ¨mes Temps RÃ©el >> EmbarquÃ©s >> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex >> France >> Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko. >> >> >> -- >> Thierry Goubier >> CEA list >> Laboratoire des Fondations des SystÃ¨mes Temps RÃ©el EmbarquÃ©s >> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex >> France >> Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko. > -- Thierry Goubier CEA list Laboratoire des Fondations des SystÃ¨mes Temps RÃ©el EmbarquÃ©s 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex France Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95

4 4

[pharo-project/pharo-core]
by GitHub Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

Branch: refs/tags/30495 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

1 0

[regression reporter]regression occurred
by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation-M-Z/labe… 3 regressions found. RPackage.Tests.RPackageReadOnlyCompleteSetupTest.testAddTag RPackage.Tests.RPackageReadOnlyCompleteSetupTest.testAddTagNames RPackage.Tests.RPackageSetTest.testPolymorphicWithPackageInfo

1 0

[regression reporter]regression occurred
by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation-M-Z/labe… 3 regressions found. RPackage.Tests.RPackageReadOnlyCompleteSetupTest.testAddTag RPackage.Tests.RPackageReadOnlyCompleteSetupTest.testAddTagNames RPackage.Tests.RPackageSetTest.testPolymorphicWithPackageInfo

1 0

[regression reporter]regression occurred
by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation-M-Z/labe… 3 regressions found. RPackage.Tests.RPackageReadOnlyCompleteSetupTest.testAddTag RPackage.Tests.RPackageReadOnlyCompleteSetupTest.testAddTagNames RPackage.Tests.RPackageSetTest.testPolymorphicWithPackageInfo

1 0

Pharo Sprint Lille 18th October
by Marcus Denker Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

What? Pharo Sprint When? Friday, 18th October, slowly starting at 9:30am Where? RMoD, Inria Lille, Building B, third floor http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/web/pier/contact As the building is not open, please contact us before if you plan to come.

9 11

https://pharo.fogbugz.com ??
by Alexandre Bergel Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

Hi Yes, I dare asking this question. How can I create a login on https://pharo.fogbugz.com ? I guess this is the website that we use to monitor issues right? I have created a login on bugs.pharo.org. I am not sure how does this differ from the fogbugz... Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

6 8

bug: [4993] Typing cmd+L cancel all typing and we can't undo it [Terminated]
by kilon Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

This is my first pharo bug fix so be gentle :D https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/4993/Typing-cmd-L-cancel-all-typing-and-w… <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/4993/Typing-cmd-L-cancel-all-typing-and-w…> As I explain in the link and in my commit log , I have added a confirm dialog so the user in case he accidentally pressed CMD+L will click no and his changes will not be lost. I have verified the bug fix with the latest pharo build. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/bug-4993-Typing-cmd-L-cancel-all-typing-and-we-can-t-… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

12 41

[pharo-project/pharo-core]
by GitHub Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

Branch: refs/tags/30494 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

1 0