January 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 1915 in pharo: Making ToolSet more flexible
by pharo＠googlecode.com April 16, 2011

April 16, 2011

Comment #2 on issue 1915 by marianopeck: Making ToolSet more flexible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1915 Here was the discussion http://forum.world.st/Questions-about-ToolSet-td1460544.html

1 11

[Pharo-project] Issue 3620 in pharo: Settings: OCompletion settings appear twice
by pharo＠googlecode.com April 15, 2011

April 15, 2011

Status: Accepted Owner: laurent....(a)gmail.com New issue 3620 by laurent....(a)gmail.com: Settings: OCompletion settings appear twice http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3620 Pharo image: dev 1.2 Steps to reproduce: 1. open settings 2. in search field type 'compl' then enter 3. OCompletion settings appear twice

4 20

[Pharo-project] Issue 3488 in pharo: Find and replace dialog behavior
by pharo＠googlecode.com April 15, 2011

April 15, 2011

Status: Accepted Owner: aplantec Labels: Milestone-1.2 New issue 3488 by aplantec: Find and replace dialog behavior http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3488 I wonder if this is a feature or a bug. When I open a system windows AND a find & replace popup, even if the system window is in front, when I click in the code pane of a method, the find replace popup comes to front :( I mean, it gets the focus. Thanks Mariano It was supposed to be a feature, I mean for the find & replace window to always stay on top. A setting can be easily introduced to allow/forbid this. But, it should not take the keyboard focus: if you click on a code pane, for example, the find & replace window comes to top but the clicked code pane should keep the keyboard focus. It is the case here. Did you noticed something different ? Cheers Alain Igor answer: i think that the problem here (as i understood), that search window capturing a global focus, while in reality it should prevent interaction only with window, where you activated search/replace function, so you should not be able to interact with that window, while still should be able to interact with another ones.

1 3

[Pharo-project] Issue 3497 in pharo: Monticello Browser, +slice doesn't validate for not selecting any package
by pharo＠googlecode.com April 15, 2011

April 15, 2011

Status: Accepted Owner: marianopeck Labels: Milestone-1.2 New issue 3497 by marianopeck: Monticello Browser, +slice doesn't validate for not selecting any package http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3497 When creating a new slice in the Monticello browser, this tool automatically shows up all the dirty packages. For me (stupid) it was not obvious that I have to click on it and select them. This is why I upload an empty slice (without depedencies). I suggest a validation that in case of not having selectd any package, raise a warning/error saying "You did not select any package. Are you sure you want to proceed and create an empty slice?" or an error: "You did not select any package. Please select at least one." Pharo core version: 12288

1 8

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3240 in pharo: be more explicit about attribute changes to gain another 5-10x speedup
by pharo＠googlecode.com April 15, 2011

April 15, 2011

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-1.2 Milestone-1.3 Comment #4 on issue 3240 by siguctua: be more explicit about attribute changes to gain another 5-10x speedup http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3240 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 1

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3262 in pharo: Debugger enhancement to open in a background process when the UI process is busy
by pharo＠googlecode.com April 12, 2011

April 12, 2011

Updates: Summary: Debugger enhancement to open in a background process when the UI process is busy Comment #2 on issue 3262 by stephane.ducasse: Debugger enhancement to open in a background process when the UI process is busy http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3262 Tried to rescue some of Eliot Miranda improvement for the debugger. Strangely enough the functions introduced by eliot got removed and not invoked in latter versions. Now invoking the debugger crash the system probably because there is an problem with the semaphore or other. I just save this to avoid to redo everything. Attachments: Debugger.1.cs 4.4 KB

1 4

[Pharo-project] Issue 3393 in pharo: Better support of configuration dependencies in Monticello Browser
by pharo＠googlecode.com April 12, 2011

April 12, 2011

Status: Accepted Owner: alexandre.bergel CC: da...(a)teleport.com, stephane.ducasse Labels: Difficulty-Easy New issue 3393 by alexandre.bergel: Better support of configuration dependencies in Monticello Browser http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3393 Configurations are better handled now. If the configuration you're editing depends on another configuration, then it is correctly defined in the baseline. MonticelloGUI-AlexandreBergel.83 in the inbox

1 2

[Pharo-project] Issue 3568 in pharo: Remove SelectorBrowser
by pharo＠googlecode.com April 12, 2011

April 12, 2011

Status: Accepted Owner: stephane...(a)gmail.com CC: Benjamin...(a)gmail.com Labels: Milestone-1.3 New issue 3568 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Remove SelectorBrowser http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3568 Now we can remove SelectorBrowser. Before we should check that '*b' . 'ab' . true shows match in Finder.

1 5

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 2986 in pharo: DemoMode should not change Fonts only sizes
by pharo＠googlecode.com April 11, 2011

April 11, 2011

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-1.2 Milestone-1.3 Comment #4 on issue 2986 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: DemoMode should not change Fonts only sizes http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2986 let's do this as one of the first things in 1.3

1 4

[Pharo-project] Help (perfect for newcomers) migrating a technical FAQ
by Mariano Martinez Peck April 10, 2011

April 10, 2011

Hi folks. I had a good idea and and it perfect for someone that wants to help and don't know how. It is not the most entertained task, but I promise you will learn a lot. Mostly, if you are newcomer. The idea is basically to migrate the FAQ that is here: http://scg.unibe.ch/wiki/faq/pharofaq to a new section in the collaborative Pharo book: http://book.pharo-project.org/ So....any takers ? Let us know so that we generate a new user in the Book The idea is also to check whether what is says is still correct for pharo or if it needs an update. Or even how to improve it (from the view of a newcomer). Thanks Mariano

2 4