- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Website] Updated Linux download instructions
by Marcus Denker Dec. 14, 2017

Dec. 14, 2017

Hi, I have updated the download instruction with the infos from https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20799/Update-Linux-Download-instructions Here are the two pages: https://pharo.org/gnu-linux-installation-64 https://pharo.org/gnu-linux-installation <https://pharo.org/gnu-linux-installation> for the 32 bit version I opted to list the package based installation first as the zip file is quite complex (requiring manual setup). TODO - add a pointe to get.pharo.org <http://get.pharo.org/> - add two to actually start Pharo for all cases. - Check https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20147/ <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20147/> - Check if some linux infos from http://pharo.org/download <http://pharo.org/download> should not be better moved to the linux page. Marcus

4 7

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #379: 20865-update-iceberg-to-065
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #379 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #599 was integrated: "20865-update-iceberg-to-065" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/599 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20865 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

I love the launcher!!!!
by Stephane Ducasse Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

Hi I love the PharoLauncher. It helps me to manage my parallel development and projects. We should put a link on the Pharo web site because http://files.pharo.org/platform/launcher/ is arcane. Stef

10 22

better name for #aggregateRuns:
by Pavel Krivanek Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

Hi, do you have some proposals for a better name for the message named #aggregateRuns? (#(1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 6 ) aggregateRuns: [ :each | each = 4]) >>> #(#(1 2 3) #(4) #(1 2 3 5 6)). (#(1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 ) aggregateRuns: [ :each | each = 4]) >>> #(#(1 2 3) #(4) #(1 2 3) #(4) #(5 6)). ((1 to: 12) aggregateRuns: [ :each | (each \\ 3) = 0]) >>> #(#(1 2) #(3) #(4 5) #(6) #(7 8) #(9) #(10 11) #(12)). The current comment is: "Answer a new collection of the same species as the receiver with elements being collections (of the receiver species) containing those elements of the receiver for which the given block consecutively evaluates to the same object." https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20864/add-examples-to-SequenceableCollect… Cheers, -- Pavel

12 19

Did the selection in Playground or rubric change?
by Stephane Ducasse Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

Hi usually in previous version we could put the cursor on the line and get senders and implementors without having to select the code. Now this super cool features does not work anymore. Is it only my image? Stef

4 6

About a shared trello board
by Stephane Ducasse Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

Hi I'm thinking that we are not good at communicating and coordinating effort I would like start a (read only) and welcome contributions on demand trello board so that we know each others on what parts of pharo we are currently working and what are the next steps. Does it make sense for you guys? Stef

2 2

spurious characters in class comments
by Nicolas Cellier Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

Take a look at Dictionary.class.st for example https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/blob/bc8b9658958f4464189cf3e7fffd8c9… on line 10: IÃÆÃÆÃâÃâÃÆÃâÃâÃ am use when we need a collection of objects which I can access with a key. For example if you associate some words with a definition, the word will be the key and the definition will be the value. Both of them can be any kind of objects. At each commit, the number of odd characters increases...

3 2

Re: [Pharo-dev] odd behaviour dragging method between protocols
by Nicolai Hess Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

Happened to me too. I think. I sometimes thought hey where is that method gone, couldn't remember I deleted it. Am 13.12.2017 03:42 schrieb "Ben Coman" <btc(a)openinworld.com>: I could just be having a brain freeze, but just sharing in case anyone else is similarly going mad... a few times recently in Nautilus I've dragged a method from the fourth pane and dropped it on a protocol in the third pane and the method disappeared from the system. Luckily its easily recovered from Tools > Code Changes, where it shows as deleted. But its weird that a delete could be triggered from the action I (thought I) performed. I've yet to detect a pattern. Unfortunately its kind of blink-and-you-miss-it. Its not until a second later when selecting the target protocol that the behaviour becomes apparent. This is in 60527-64, Unix built on Jul 20 2017 20:40:36 Compiler: 4.6.3 cheers -ben

2 1

odd behaviour dragging method between protocols
by Ben Coman Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

I could just be having a brain freeze, but just sharing in case anyone else is similarly going mad... a few times recently in Nautilus I've dragged a method from the fourth pane and dropped it on a protocol in the third pane and the method disappeared from the system. Luckily its easily recovered from Tools > Code Changes, where it shows as deleted. But its weird that a delete could be triggered from the action I (thought I) performed. I've yet to detect a pattern. Unfortunately its kind of blink-and-you-miss-it. Its not until a second later when selecting the target protocol that the behaviour becomes apparent. This is in 60527-64, Unix built on Jul 20 2017 20:40:36 Compiler: 4.6.3 cheers -ben

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #378: 20866-revert-retryTimes-parameter-on-CI
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Dec. 12, 2017

Dec. 12, 2017

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #378 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #600 was integrated: "20866-revert-retryTimes-parameter-on-CI" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/600 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20866 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0