- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Author identification :)
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Oct. 24, 2008

Oct. 24, 2008

A while ago I hacked with doru an author map. something that would be good to have with mondrian in pharo to check the licensing issues. Here you see the classes and their methods and a color per author. :)

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev
by Bill Schwab Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

Damien, This is spooky - none of them seem to work now. I tried the two one-click images you mentioned and the Polymorph-TT demo. This is strange, because I remember seeing it work, and I'm fairly certain it was a one-click. Hmmm.... I am not at 100% right now (fighting a cold), but a little later I will try downloading them again to see what happens. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu Tel: (352) 273-6785 FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>> damien.cassou(a)gmail.com 10/23/08 11:11 AM >>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Bill Schwab <BSchwab(a)anest.ufl.edu> wrote: > Is the Linux VM dated? It did not prompt to save before quitting. IIRC, an earlier one-click had that feature. I didn't change anything from Marcus' one-click from http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Downloads?tm=2 but the image and changes file. Could you please test with that image and report the results? Thank you -- Damien Cassou Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

1 0

[Pharo-project] ChangesOrganizer for Pharo
by Pavel Krivanek Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

Hi, I fixed ChangesOrganizer for Pharo http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=71 ...and did some mess in issue tracker ;-) Cheers, -- Pavel

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev
by Bill Schwab Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

Damien, Is the Linux VM dated? It did not prompt to save before quitting. IIRC, an earlier one-click had that feature. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu Tel: (352) 273-6785 FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>> damien.cassou(a)gmail.com 10/23/08 2:00 AM >>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Marcus Denker <denker(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote: > Don't know if you need macos, could be. (never tried it on linux). Could all of you please try: http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/10024/Pharo0.1-10101-oneclick.zip It has been generated on Linux by updating the changes and image files only. -- Damien Cassou Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

2 1

[Pharo-project] Fwd: [squeak-dev] Fully Relicensed version of mainstream Squeak
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

Begin forwarded message: > From: Yoshiki Ohshima <yoshiki(a)vpri.org> > Date: October 23, 2008 2:24:58 AM CEDT > To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org > >, etoys(a)lists.laptop.org > Subject: [squeak-dev] Fully Relicensed version of mainstream Squeak > Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org > > > > Hello, > > First of all, thank you for all the people who spend great deal of > time on fixing our server. I've been watching the IRC log > (http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/squeak/) and was admiring the work! > > As mentioned in the leadership discussion minutes from Craig, the > plan now is as follows: > > - Make Squeak version 4.0. This is based on the 3.11 effort but > get rid of or rewrite code that are not relicensed and make a > fully relicensed version relatively conservatively. Etoys 4.0 is > now fully relicensed, and we can bring the removal and rewrite > changesets from that stream. > > - Craig continue to work on the Spoon based system. It is dubbed > Squeak 5.0. (My personal opinion is that because it is fairly > different, it could have a different name, but...) > > BTW, during the Etoys' relicensing effort, I made a little web app > that lets you view *all history* from Squeak V1 to the latest version: > > http://tinlizzie.org:8080/seaside/examples/authorship2 > > I can make a similar page for 3.10 or such, and also give a tool to > check the unlicened code in a particular code base. > > Ken and Mathew, how does it sound? > > -- Yoshiki > >

1 0

[Pharo-project] Server down ?
by Frederic Pluquet Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

Hello, I couldn't access to the http://gforge.inria.fr/ server. Is it down ? FrÃ©d -- FrÃ©dÃ©ric Pluquet UniversitÃ© Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Assistant http://www.ulb.ac.be/di/fpluquet

2 2

[Pharo-project] Issue 260 cleanup hasLiteralThorough
by Gwenael Casaccio Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

Hello, I've renamed hasLiteralThorough: to #referesToLiteral: (cf http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox/SLICE-cleanup-hasLiteralThorough-G.C…) . And I've also signed the license agreement if you can add me. Cheers, Gwenael Casaccio

4 6

Re: [Pharo-project] OB annotation icons
by Lukas Renggli Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

>> "Icons that show different concepts (and calling >> super and overriding a method are entirely different concepts, as well >> as putting a breakpoint or deprecating a method) and that hide each >> other are evil." > > Absolutely agree, hence that design. And in any case calling super is a > stupid indicator, especially when you know that it doesn't check that the > super call is a) to the same method or b) on every call path. The indicator > actually means 'might call some method declared in a superclass', which of > course you can easily do by calling a method that isn't overridden in the > declaring class, so what the hell use is that? Thank you for expressing it that clearly ;-) > OB is a good prototype, although IMO I disagree. I exclusively use OB in productive development on a daily bases for over 2 years now. > b) shouldn't include any action abstraction because that's best > handled in a completely different and system-wide fashion; I disagree. OB provides this system-wide abstraction. It is the fault of the other tools that don't use these abstractions. For example, I've written a process browser, debugger, inspector and several other tools in OB and they all benefit from the commands that already exist and that other people write as extensions (e.g. open a hierarchy browser from within the debugger). I agree that the abstraction is not optimal in all cases (e.g. text commands, applicability tests, ...), but it is definitely better than anything else I've seen so far. > different and system-wide fashion; c) is too messily tied to Morphic, with a > number of hacks; and relatedly, d) shouldn't extend existing Morphic > controls (such as lists) because they come with too much baggage (i.e. being > all things to all people). Earlier versions of OB were entirely separated from Morphic. Unfortunately it was tied to morphic over time as more and more people joined the development. I guess this happend due to laziness and lack of documentation and knowledge. Along the same lines: Every line of the model and view used to be tested with in-depth SUnit-Tests. Unfortunately that is not the case anymore either. People add features without writing tests. This is what happens, when an appealing and widely adapted projects entirely lacks a form of leadership. At some point there was an AJAX based web view and a XUL interface. I think somebody even made GTK view. Earlier versions of OB run in GemStone, with the view running in Squeak Morphic. There is an ongoing port for GST. Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

3 4

[Pharo-project] OB annotation icons
by Torsten Bergmann Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

>use a strikethrough font style? +1 For icons: why not reuse some of the Eclipse icons. As far as I know they are free to use and some developers might be familiar with them [1]. Would also be good to work with small overlays/decorators as Eclipse does [2]. Bye Torsten [1] http://www.nur-scheuer.de/archives/243-Eclipse-Icons.html [2] http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-Decorators/decorators.html -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser

3 4

[Pharo-project] OB annotation icons
by Dan Corneanu Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

Does OB have any icon associated with deprecated methods?

5 12