- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] DictionaryTest
by Alexandre Bergel Jan. 7, 2009

Jan. 7, 2009

Dear List, A new version of CollectionsTests is waiting in PharoInbox. Here is the comments: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= **This version includes the content of version 142** The most important methods in Dictionary are covered by DictionaryTest. Some implementation methods in Set are also covered by the testing class. One trait TDictionaryAddingTest has been added. More traits will be added soon. DictionaryTest coverageAsString ==> 'DictionaryTest covers 77% of Dictionary' -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

1 0

[Pharo-project] pharo is... ?
by Sean Allen Jan. 7, 2009

Jan. 7, 2009

I started using Squeak a few months ago, mostly in a time permitting fashion.. 2-3 weeks ago, I saw a Pharo related message come across that list and joined here to see what Pharo is. I'm still not entirely sure, so I'm asking... Pharo is... ? The little bit of marketing on the website makes it sound appealing and I'm sure if I had more experience with Squeak then downloading the one click and running it and poking around would have answered a ton of questions but, I don't have the Squeak background to have that be meaningful. Is there a document somewhere that says what Pharo is meant to be. What initial concrete changes from Squeak where done/are going to be done? I really need something as a jumping off point... Thanks for any pointers, Sean

3 7

Re: [Pharo-project] Next Issue ;-)
by Bill Schwab Jan. 6, 2009

Jan. 6, 2009

I saw some similar goofiness at one point, but do not recall whether it was related to cryptography. I am interested in it and the SSL classes. I managed to install same at one point, but it is no longer clear how I did it. Mining the change log of the most recent image where it works (I have one) and/or searching my email exchanges with Ron might help. The idea being to figure out when it worked and then look for special instructions that I might have followed. Gary, it would be nice to have your mutex fix in Pharo. One of the first things I would hope to get working on Pharo is very multi-process oriented, and a reliable #adddeferredUIMessage: would be most helpful. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu Tel: (352) 273-6785 FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>> gazzaguru2(a)btinternet.com 01/06/09 7:22 AM >>> That is normally a symptom of something updating the World morphs in a non-UI process. Morphs should only be changed from the UI process otherwise all kind of inconsistencies can happen. WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: can be used top safely perform actions but, for some applications, finer control is needed. We have developed Squeak applications that are of necessity multi-process driven and were forced to modify WorldState to allow (mutex based) synchronisation with the event loop, thus avoiding the issues. Regards, Gary. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Brown" <brian(a)ablelinktech.com> To: "An open mailing list to discuss any topics related to an open-sourceSmalltalk" <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 10:26 PM Subject: [Pharo-project] Next Issue ;-) > I'm trying to load cryptography 1.1 from the Universe browser. > Everything seems to go well, and the dialog completes and exits. > Immediately following that, whenever the mouse moves over any morphs, > you get the below traceback. the ivars leftMorphs, enteredMorphs, and > overMorphs are all nil, but are being treated as collections... > > > UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #includes: > MouseOverHandler>>noticeMouseOver:event: > HandMorph>>noticeMouseOver:event: > OBTextMorphWithShout(Morph)>>handleMouseOver: > MouseEvent>>sentTo: > OBTextMorphWithShout(Morph)>>handleEvent: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: > OBTextMorphWithShout(Morph)>>processEvent:using: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: > TransformMorph(Morph)>>processEvent:using: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: > OBPluggableTextMorphWithShout(Morph)>>processEvent:using: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: > OBGroupingMorph(Morph)>>processEvent:using: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: > SystemWindow(Morph)>>processEvent:using: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: > MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: > PasteUpMorph(Morph)>>processEvent:using: > PasteUpMorph>>processEvent:using: > PasteUpMorph(Morph)>>processEvent: > HandMorph>>sendEvent:focus:clear: > HandMorph>>sendMouseEvent: > HandMorph>>handleEvent: > MouseOverHandler>>processMouseOver: > HandMorph>>handleEvent: > HandMorph>>processEvents > [] in WorldState>>doOneCycleNowFor: {[:h | ActiveHand := h. h > processEvents. ActiveHand := nil]} > Array(SequenceableCollection)>>do: > WorldState>>handsDo: > WorldState>>doOneCycleNowFor: > WorldState>>doOneCycleFor: > PasteUpMorph>>doOneCycle > [] in Project class>>spawnNewProcess {[[World doOneCycle. Processor > yield. false] whileFalse. nil]} > [] in BlockContext>>newProcess {[self value. Processor > terminateActive]} > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Underscores question
by Bill Schwab Jan. 6, 2009

Jan. 6, 2009

Gwenael, This might be it. I thought there was a little more to it, but c_a call: b. and the interpretations (number list) might be what I was remembering; I thought it were a few other concrete examples. There are other parts of the thread that seem very familar. My own take is that the default should be to treat underscores as a letter, and to allow file-in of code with underscore assignment as an option. That helps with external interfacing, cross-dialect compatibility, and retains access to existing/older code. I do not like Burt's idea of a class method #allowUnderscores, because (I think??) it assumes _ will not appear in class names, which would be very helpful in mapping external names to classes. However, a global variable could work. However, I still see underscore assignment as something that should be supported only when filing in code that uses it. Sorry I didn't find more. Bill ============================ Gmane From: Bert Freudenberg <bert <at> impara.de> Subject: Underscores in Identifiers (was: Re: Random and unsolicited feedback on 3.9a) Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general Date: 2005-11-19 10:58:23 GMT (3 years, 6 weeks, 6 days, 10 hours and 10 minutes ago) When dealing with low_level_code, I'd love to have underscores in identifiers - not even just method names, but for variables, too. This could probably be achieved simply by using a different type table with $_ being an #xLetter in Scanner (not sure about the SmaCC- based Compiler). However, I would also strongly suggest *not* to allow this as a standard. Apart from breaking old code file-ins, we would soon get tons of unreadable gibberish by C-trained newbies ;-) Instead, when filing in, the compiler would interpret underscores as assignment, just as it is now. *Only* if specifically enabled by the filed-in code would it be switched to allow underscores in identifiers. Same goes for normal development - *unless* a class answer true when asked #allowUnderscoresInIdentifiers, underscores are compiled as assignments. The file-out code would take that into account to generate the code snippet enabling underscores in identifiers needed for later file-in. How does that sound? - Bert - Am 19.11.2005 um 01:39 schrieb Andreas Raab: > Can we please consider the consequences of doing that (like > potentially breaking lots of code from fileIns) and how we are > going to deal with it *before* such a change gets included? I would > hate it to have another one of those situations where things break > for absolutely no good reason. > > Cheers, > - Andreas ============================ Gmane From: Andreas Raab <andreas.raab <at> gmx.de> Subject: Re: 3.9 underscore still there? Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general Date: 2006-10-30 20:18:13 GMT (2 years, 9 weeks, 5 days, 6 hours and 46 minutes ago) Bill Schwab wrote: > My preference would be for ANSI compatibility. With that said, having > underscored in selectors, and even just all but the first slot, would do > almost everying I need. I doubt I use them in variable names, and if I > do, I could change it. If I were to move my production code to Squeak, > I would be editing a lot more than a few variable names. Most of uses > of underscores are matching the outside world, and that is not so > readily altered to suit my whim or Squeak's limitations. If all you want to do is to get your code going in Squeak, a fairly simple alternative is to subclass the current parser/compiler, apply Ian's patch and use those for loading your own classes. It ain't exactly a great solution but may be helpful in the short term. > If we can get > Ian's fix in the mainstream, it would be greatly appreciated. This is one of these situations where a little more thought is in order because there are both short-term and long-term implications. Consider an example like this: c_a call: b. Depending on the interpretation of underscore we have 3 possibilities: 1) Underscore means assignment: The above is a legal expression. 2) Underscore is a letter: The above is a legal, too. 3) Underscore is a letter in selectors except if first, and invalid for variable names: The above is illegal. So in two out of three interpretations the above is legal, only in the last one it is not. What troubles me here is that while it may be an okay solution in the short term to put the burden on the user of the underscore (e.g., basically saying "if you use underscores you need to understand where exactly you can use them and where not") the inconsistency and complexity inherent in the description that "underscores are treated as letters in selectors unless they are the first character and cannot be used in variable names" strikes me as a *very* poor choice in the long term. I'd rather do something where (based on some meta-annotations) the parser can decide whether to to treat underscores as assignments or as letters and possibly rewrite them on the fly. The essential idea being that legacy code (using underscore as assignments) can still be loaded into a later version. Cheers, - Andreas Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu Tel: (352) 273-6785 FAX: (352) 392-7029

1 0

[Pharo-project] Fwd: [ANN] 10202
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Jan. 6, 2009

Jan. 6, 2009

> > From: stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> > Date: January 6, 2009 3:24:29 PM CEST > To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr> > Subject: [ANN] 10202 > > > - More test in DictionaryTest. The class Dictionary is now covered > at 66% > - Issue 433: TPureBehavior>>traits to get a collection of used traits. > - Issue 226: Resize comment pane in Monticello browser > - Issue 426: Code coverage > - Collection extension: groupedBy, flatCollect:, collectAsSet:, > should remove sixx as package > > Stef > > >

1 0

[Pharo-project] DictionaryTest
by Alexandre Bergel Jan. 6, 2009

Jan. 6, 2009

New tests on DictionaryTest. The method categories accesssing, adding, comparing, enumerating, printing, removing, and testing are covered. This represents a coreverage of 66% In PharoInbox. I am continuing the coverage... Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

4 12

[Pharo-project] Fwd: [ANN] Number comparison, hash, NaN, Point, and other partially ordered sets
by nicolas cellier Jan. 6, 2009

Jan. 6, 2009

StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@...> writes: > > Nicolas > > could you summarize your solution? > > Stef > > On Jan 5, 2009, at 12:55 AM, nicolas cellier wrote: > Here is the summary: 1) equality relation is not transitive due to inexact asFloat conversion example: (1/2) = 0.5. "This is exact" (1/2) + (1/(2 raisedTo: 100)) = 0.5. "This is an inexact conversion" (1/2) + (1/(2 raisedTo: 100)) ~= (1/2). "If equal where transitive, they should be equal" Solution: base comparison on inexact->exact conversions rather than the contrary... inexact->exact is called #asTrueFraction (#asExactFraction in GNU Smalltalk). This solution is known from the wise lispers for so long... http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/lcl50/aug/aug-170.html This is http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=3374 2) Some numbers are equal, but have different hash codes Since some Float can equal some Integer or Fraction, it is necessary to change at least 2 out of 3 hash implementations. Solution I retained: - preserve Integer hash - change Float hash if they have a fractionPart = 0.0 (they are equal to anInteger) - change Fraction hash if they could be equal to a Float (I only test that denominator is a power of two, which is a necessary but not a sufficient condition). This is http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6601, and http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=3360, solution has been posted at #3374. Note: this results in loosing a little speed for small Float hash, and lot more for large Float hash. But make it right > make it fast... 3) Comparing Float nan to a Float or an Integer does not follow IEEE 754 conventions comparison should always return false since nan cannot be ordered. Magnitude assume subInstances form a totally ordered set. Thus Number is not a well behaved Magnitude. Consequently, Number must define not only < but also <= >= and > Note that only < and <= would be strictly necessary. The other two could be defined like this: > b ^b < self >= b ^b <= self I choose to change >= implementation in Magnitude, and reimplement everything in Number subclasses (though > and >= would not be strictly necessary). This is http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6719 But the VM also makes same assumption as Magnitude and must be changed too - this is http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7260 4) Comparing a Number and a Point is weird (different result with an Integer and a Float) Float did coerce to a Point, then compare. Integer did use a false total order assumption through super Magnitude. Two main solutions: - either coerce Number to a Point (might be implicitely used this way in the image... hard to tell). - or raise an Exception Solution: I choosed to raise an Exception. This is http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7259

3 2

Re: [Pharo-project] Underscores question
by Bill Schwab Jan. 6, 2009

Jan. 6, 2009

Gwenael, Is the plan to do this for 1.0? Have you considered a flag for _ assignment? It seems like something that would be most useful on file-in, unless you think you can make it all work at the same time. Shortly after m17n gained acceptance, I re-raised the question of whether _ really needed a special status. Andreas argued for the status quo, but did so with some interesting examples. I can't do it this minute (will try later today unless you are already have read it), but it might be interesting to search for that exchange and consider his examples for your tests. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu Tel: (352) 273-6785 FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>> mrgwen(a)gmail.com 01/06/09 4:50 AM >>> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 09:54:56 Lukas Renggli wrote: > > This is not yet integrated > > I assume a change like that will affect many different places. Is > there a list of things that remain to be fixed (Debugger, > RefactoringBrowser, Method Finder, ...). > > Lukas Yes, I don't have the list but I will publish the list on the mailing list before any public release and off course I'll publish the fix. Gwenael _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

1 0

Jan. 6, 2009

Hi adrian I wanted to know if we could not have traits defined in Behavior and whose behavior would be self traitComposition allTraits BTW will you have some time to look at my improvements? Stef

3 6

[Pharo-project] Next Issue ;-)
by Brian Brown Jan. 6, 2009

Jan. 6, 2009

I'm trying to load cryptography 1.1 from the Universe browser. Everything seems to go well, and the dialog completes and exits. Immediately following that, whenever the mouse moves over any morphs, you get the below traceback. the ivars leftMorphs, enteredMorphs, and overMorphs are all nil, but are being treated as collections... UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #includes: MouseOverHandler>>noticeMouseOver:event: HandMorph>>noticeMouseOver:event: OBTextMorphWithShout(Morph)>>handleMouseOver: MouseEvent>>sentTo: OBTextMorphWithShout(Morph)>>handleEvent: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: OBTextMorphWithShout(Morph)>>processEvent:using: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: TransformMorph(Morph)>>processEvent:using: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: OBPluggableTextMorphWithShout(Morph)>>processEvent:using: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: OBGroupingMorph(Morph)>>processEvent:using: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: SystemWindow(Morph)>>processEvent:using: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchDefault:with: MorphicEventDispatcher>>dispatchEvent:with: PasteUpMorph(Morph)>>processEvent:using: PasteUpMorph>>processEvent:using: PasteUpMorph(Morph)>>processEvent: HandMorph>>sendEvent:focus:clear: HandMorph>>sendMouseEvent: HandMorph>>handleEvent: MouseOverHandler>>processMouseOver: HandMorph>>handleEvent: HandMorph>>processEvents [] in WorldState>>doOneCycleNowFor: {[:h | ActiveHand := h. h processEvents. ActiveHand := nil]} Array(SequenceableCollection)>>do: WorldState>>handsDo: WorldState>>doOneCycleNowFor: WorldState>>doOneCycleFor: PasteUpMorph>>doOneCycle [] in Project class>>spawnNewProcess {[[World doOneCycle. Processor yield. false] whileFalse. nil]} [] in BlockContext>>newProcess {[self value. Processor terminateActive]}

2 1