[Pharo-project] Splitting network package
Hi all, while working on some unicode related stuff I ended up integrating some MIME changes from Sophie. For that I would like to split up the Network package into nine sub packages (Network-Kernel, Network-MIME, ...). Will also make it easier to update URI and MIME packages later etc. Hope that is ok with everybody. Michael
Yes go! I would like to have packages and not category besides that I prefer lot of packages well designed than a fat one. Let us know when we can include your changes. Stef
Hi all,
while working on some unicode related stuff I ended up integrating some MIME changes from Sophie. For that I would like to split up the Network package into nine sub packages (Network-Kernel, Network-MIME, ...). Will also make it easier to update URI and MIME packages later etc.
Hope that is ok with everybody.
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On 08.01.2009, at 16:00, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Yes go! Yes!
I would like to have packages and not category besides that I prefer lot of packages well designed than a fat one.
And at some point even real "packages inside packages". Marcus
Let us know when we can include your changes. Stef
Hi all,
while working on some unicode related stuff I ended up integrating some MIME changes from Sophie. For that I would like to split up the Network package into nine sub packages (Network-Kernel, Network-MIME, ...). Will also make it easier to update URI and MIME packages later etc.
Hope that is ok with everybody.
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Hi marcus I learned the composition of the evaluation PC for the position. There is only one local person and all the others are not in our domain. But this is like that. Stef
I would like to have packages and not category besides that I prefer lot of packages well designed than a fat one.
And at some point even real "packages inside packages".
Marcus
Let us know when we can include your changes. Stef
Hi all,
while working on some unicode related stuff I ended up integrating some MIME changes from Sophie. For that I would like to split up the Network package into nine sub packages (Network-Kernel, Network-MIME, ...). Will also make it easier to update URI and MIME packages later etc.
Hope that is ok with everybody.
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Ok I will do a release this evening, except if marcus is faster than me. Stef On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
Marcus Denker wrote:
On 08.01.2009, at 16:00, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Yes go! Yes!
:-) OK, the packages are in the inbox now. I also split the Collections package.
MIME converters and document classes were moved to a new package, also affects Collections-Streams.
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Hi all, updated MIME, URI and File packages in inbox. Some of the URI related changes are somewhat incomplete as I merged them from a different context. Hopefully I didn't break anything though :-) With merges like this it is really a problem that MC doesn't allow cherry picking changes... The overall goal with the URI changes is to complete replace the current Url implementation. We have done this quite successfully in Sophie and even more radically in the experimental ySqueak branch. Suggesting to replace Url classes by URI was a sure way to get a flame war going on the Squeak dev list. So what is general opinion on this for Pharo? Michael
Hi all,
updated MIME, URI and File packages in inbox.
ok
Some of the URI related changes are somewhat incomplete as I merged them from a different context. Hopefully I didn't break anything though :-)
With merges like this it is really a problem that MC doesn't allow cherry picking changes...
but you cannot reject a change?
The overall goal with the URI changes is to complete replace the current Url implementation.
Do we keep around the Url class so that people can load their code? May be we could have a general mechanism for having class deprecation?
We have done this quite successfully in Sophie and even more radically in the experimental ySqueak branch.
Suggesting to replace Url classes by URI was a sure way to get a flame war going on the Squeak dev list.
I imagine that we are less knowgeable.
So what is general opinion on this for Pharo?
Not really. what could be the argument? Stef
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (3)
-
Marcus Denker -
Michael Rueger -
Stéphane Ducasse