- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Links section for url shortcuts in the Pharo website
by Mariano Martinez Peck April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

Hi Adrian. Lots of times I found myself trying to remember the Pharo url shortcuts. I mean all of these: http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/stable-core http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/stable http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/unstable-core http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/unstable http://issues.pharo-project.org http://ci.pharo-project.org http://book.pharo-project.org http://wiki.pharo-project.org Can we create a new section somewhere in the Pharo website and list all those links ? Thanks a lot in advance, -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

2 1

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo 1.2.1. Setup for Win32 (including CogVM)
by Marcus Denker April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

On Apr 6, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > Geert wrote: >> I reckon the OneClick should also use this excellent Pharo branded Cog VM :) > > We already take care. I mailed it to Marcus, I guess he has to > find the time to integrate it. > Yes, OOPSLA deadline is on Friday... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

[Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement
by Torsten Bergmann April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

Laurent wrote: >I've started :) http://linuxfr.org/news/pharo12 I guess James Robertson was first (when we still talked about it). See http://www.jarober.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Pharo_1.2… and it is therefore already on http://planet.smalltalk.org However - I now followed too: http://astares.blogspot.com Bye T. -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

1 0

[Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo 1.2.1. Setup for Win32 (including CogVM)
by Torsten Bergmann April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

Geert wrote: >I reckon the OneClick should also use this excellent Pharo branded Cog VM :) We already take care. I mailed it to Marcus, I guess he has to find the time to integrate it. Bye T. -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Links section for url shortcuts in the Pharo website
by Marcus Denker April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Hi Adrian. Lots of times I found myself trying to remember the Pharo url shortcuts. I mean all of these: > > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/stable-core > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/stable > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/unstable-core > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/unstable > > http://issues.pharo-project.org > http://ci.pharo-project.org > http://book.pharo-project.org > http://wiki.pharo-project.org > > Can we create a new section somewhere in the Pharo website and list all those links ? > Adrian did put them directl on the front page yesterday: http://www.pharo-project.org/home -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

2 1

[Pharo-project] Fwd: Actions done in 1.3
by Igor Stasenko April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> Date: 6 April 2011 13:55 Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Actions done in 1.3 To: laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> On 6 April 2011 10:30, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Planning is also important. >> >> Time is good, but another thing is i think we should think about, >> what features we want to be in new release, and do not release until >> they delivered. > > I don't really like this. I prefer rhythm, agility. Timeboxing enables > maximum value in each release. If a feature is really important, it will be > on time. If not on time, it means it was no so important. > Always green test is a must-have. > >> >> Besides bug fixing and minor improvements, there should be some >> functionality which we want to have in new release, > > That should be a goal, but don't delay a release because the feature is not > here. If releases are often ( for example every 3 months), shorter, it won't > be a big problem to wait for the next one. > I prefer to have a release *now* without my feature and wait 3 months for > the next release than no release and waiting for 3 months more with less and > less energy. > But you don't have to wait, if you want to stay on bleeding edge, you know how to do that. Just go to hudson and dowload freshly built 1.3 image. Because if you can pick any image at any moment and declare it new release, then i don't understand why do we need releases at all? What makes release to be release , when you can download latest version at any moment? That's why i saying that from release to release cleanup and fixes is good, but there should be some major functional changes, which worth to be labeled as a new version. And if you don't have them, then there is no point to make a release. > Laurent. > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

2 1

[Pharo-project] [COTDC] 42 - ExpanderMorphContracted
by laurent laffont April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

Today: ExpanderMorphContracted Comment Of The Day Contest - One Day One Comment Rules: #1: Each day a not commented class is elected. Each day the best comment will be integrated with name of the author(s). #2: If you cannot comment it, deprecate it. Results: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest Laurent

2 2

[Pharo-project] ConfigurationOfSoapOpera in 1.2 broken
by laurent laffont April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

Hi, I would like to use SOAP in Pharo. I've seen there's ConfigurationOfSoapOpera but it's broken. I've fixed deprecations of XMLSupport. But now it searches for a XMLWriter which no longer exists it seems. Someone use SOAP here ? Laurent Laffont - @lolgzs <http://twitter.com/#!/lolgzs> Pharo Smalltalk Screencasts: http://www.pharocasts.com/ Blog: http://magaloma.blogspot.com/ Developer group: http://cara74.seasidehosting.st

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement
by Marcus Denker April 5, 2011

April 5, 2011

On Apr 5, 2011, at 10:28 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > Thanks, Sven! > > I've put the page online > - as a blog entry on the news page: http://www.pharo-project.org/news > - the release page: http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-1-2-1 > > (I've slightly edited some of the bullet point items to fit on one line) > > Thanks Laurent for the translation. I've linked to the wiki page you created. > > As far as I see there's one thing missing on the website: the download sticker for the one click image (top right on the page) still points to 1.1.1. I'll try to change the sticker and link tomorrow morning. > > Regarding the one click image, on the download page we linked to 1.1.1 with and without COG. Do we still have this distinction? > Yes. 1.2 is the last release with Cog / nonCog. (we need to use and test using cog... e.g. hudson needs to use cog. This is planed for 1.3) Therefore, this is not correct: Pharo 1.2.1 One-Click is the easiest to get started: it includes all needed components (image, change and source file as well as a fast, compatible Cog VM) in one package that requires no installation the linked image does not use Cog. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

3 3

Re: [Pharo-project] Remove #class as a Compiler optimization
by Marcus Denker April 5, 2011

April 5, 2011

On Apr 5, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 April 2011 11:33, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > So....I tried with running all tests of a PharoCore 1.3 and I've got this: > > > > cog vm with optimization > > Time to run all tests:116506 > > > > cog vm without optimization > > Time to run all tests:121930 > > > > 121930 - 116506 ----> 5424 > > ((5424 * 100) / 116506) asFloat ---> 4.655554220383499 > > > > So...in Cog, running all test, there is an overhead of 4.6% > > > > Do we want to pay it ? > > > > I would...but I am all ears. > > > 5% for #class message? > this is too much. or you also removed other optimized sends? > > > Only that one. For #== I got 4.3. And doing both together (#class and #==) I got 9.05% :( > > And removing the #class optimization in a Interpreter VM gives me almost as in cog: 4.7% > > maybe I am doing something wrong... > can you try in 1.2? We did some compiler changes that are not yet fully done.... e.g. Issue 3940: BlockNode has undeclared ivar optimizedMessageNode -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

8 15