- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] 1.3 OneCick with Cog VM
by John Toohey Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

Hi, Is there a 1.3 OneClick build available with the Cog VM, or should I just down load the linux and OSX Cog builds from the Jenkins server? I often run into problems with having different VMs/Plugin on different servers, and like the idea of having both Liux and OSX supported in one package, where I can just update the image. -- ~JT

1 0

[Pharo-project] TextLint for Emacs & TextMate
by Damien Cassou Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

Dear all, Lukas Renggli and I have worked on the integration of TextLint within both TextMate and Emacs. TextLint is a tool to check your scientific writing for common style errors. Integration within TextMate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrG29zWHqkk Integration within Emacs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsG2DKgHanE It's written in Smalltalk and is currently accessible through: - Emacs (https://github.com/DamienCassou/textlint) - TextMate (https://github.com/DamienCassou/textlint) - The web (http://textlint.lukas-renggli.ch/) - A Smalltalk IDE (http://scg.unibe.ch/research/textlint) Please report any issue to https://github.com/DamienCassou/textlint. I'm also very interested in feedback, code, and whatever can make the whole thing better. If you have any problem or feedback, report on https://github.com/DamienCassou/textlint -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry

8 21

Re: [Pharo-project] [COTDC] 80#3 - TestRunnerBrowser
by laurent laffont Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

Today: TestRunnerBrowser Laurent On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:59 PM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > Today: RBSubclassOfClassToRename > > Laurent > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:55 PM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Today: CategoryEnvironment >> >> >> Comment Of The Day Contest - One Day One Comment >> Rules: >> #1: Each day a not commented class is elected. Each day the best comment >> will be integrated with name of the author(s). >> #2: If you cannot comment it, deprecate it. >> Results: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest >> >> Laurent >> > > >

4 3

[Pharo-project] 64 bit
by Milan Mimica Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

Hello list! I was wondering, are you going to provide a 64-bit OneClick package any time soon? When and what does that depend on? If not, how do I go about building my own 64-bit image on linux? -- Milan Mimica http://sparklet.sf.net

5 7

Re: [Pharo-project] Hudson build is back to normal : Pharo Core 1.3 #405
by Marcus Denker Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

On Sep 8, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 08 Sep 2011, at 12:58, marcus.denker(a)inria.fr wrote: > >> See <https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/405/> > > What changed ? What was the problem ? > A hanging process... of a vm that was running the tests that had open the port 1701... (yes, obvious to look for after one found it...) Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

1 1

[Pharo-project] union intersection difference
by Camillo Bruni Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

How should we handle the mathematical operations union / intersection / difference on different Collections? Right now the implementations are not completely consistent over the different types of collections: (#(1 1 2 2 3) union: #(2 2 3 4 4)) = #(1 2 3 4) asSet (#(1 1 2 2 3) difference: #(2 2 3 4 4)) = #(1 1) (#(1 1 2 2 3) intersection: #(2 2 3 4 4)) = #(2 2 3) I think it would make more sense to deal with this in the mathematical sense and remove duplicates and try to keep the type of the receiver: (#(1 1 2 2 3) union: #(2 2 3 4 4)) = #(1 2 3 4) (#(1 1 2 2 3) difference: #(2 2 3 4 4)) = #(1) (#(1 1 2 2 3) intersection: #(2 2 3 4 4)) = #(2 3) cami

2 1

[Pharo-project] Build failed in Hudson: Pharo Core 1.3 #402
by marcus.denker＠inria.fr Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

See <https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/402/> ------------------------------------------ [...truncated 77 lines...] 3300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 28% 3.53M 3s 3350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 29% 12.8M 3s 3400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 29% 3.38M 3s 3450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 29% 3.39M 3s 3500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 30% 3.90M 3s 3550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 30% 3.63M 3s 3600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 31% 2.01M 3s 3650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 31% 3.08M 3s 3700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 32% 2.83M 3s 3750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 32% 3.38M 3s 3800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 32% 3.65M 3s 3850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 33% 3.32M 3s 3900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 33% 12.5M 3s 3950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 34% 3.98M 3s 4000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 34% 1.05M 3s 4050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 35% 13.1M 3s 4100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 35% 4.62M 3s 4150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 35% 1.88M 3s 4200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 36% 3.33M 2s 4250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 36% 3.58M 2s 4300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 37% 3.33M 2s 4350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 37% 2.07M 2s 4400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 38% 3.10M 2s 4450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 38% 2.12M 2s 4500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 38% 3.89M 2s 4550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 39% 2.96M 2s 4600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 39% 3.21M 2s 4650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 40% 2.19M 2s 4700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 40% 2.75M 2s 4750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 41% 2.35M 2s 4800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 41% 2.53M 2s 4850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 41% 2.43M 2s 4900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 42% 2.97M 2s 4950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 42% 4.06M 2s 5000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 43% 2.40M 2s 5050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 43% 3.77M 2s 5100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 44% 3.58M 2s 5150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 44% 2.84M 2s 5200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 44% 1.22M 2s 5250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 45% 3.76M 2s 5300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 45% 3.22M 2s 5350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 46% 3.74M 2s 5400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 46% 3.91M 2s 5450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 47% 3.19M 2s 5500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 47% 3.80M 2s 5550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 47% 3.75M 2s 5600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 48% 1.82M 2s 5650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 48% 2.57M 2s 5700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 49% 2.81M 2s 5750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 49% 2.99M 2s 5800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 49% 3.13M 2s 5850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 50% 3.53M 2s 5900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 50% 3.73M 2s 5950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 51% 2.18M 2s 6000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 51% 2.06M 2s 6050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% 3.75M 2s 6100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% 3.52M 2s 6150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% 3.68M 2s 6200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 53% 3.54M 2s 6250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 53% 3.74M 2s 6300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 54% 3.25M 2s 6350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 54% 3.24M 2s 6400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% 3.19M 2s 6450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% 3.85M 2s 6500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% 3.80M 2s 6550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 56% 3.69M 2s 6600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 56% 3.64M 2s 6650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 57% 3.74M 2s 6700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 57% 3.86M 2s 6750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% 2.53M 2s 6800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% 308K 2s 6850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% 3.71M 2s 6900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 59% 2.28M 2s 6950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 59% 3.62M 2s 7000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 60% 3.74M 2s 7050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 60% 3.67M 2s 7100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% 2.97M 2s 7150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% 3.33M 2s 7200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% 2.95M 2s 7250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 62% 3.00M 2s 7300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 62% 3.36M 2s 7350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 63% 3.86M 2s 7400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 63% 3.87M 1s 7450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% 3.42M 1s 7500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% 3.96M 1s 7550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% 2.52M 1s 7600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 65% 3.20M 1s 7650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 65% 3.64M 1s 7700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 66% 3.43M 1s 7750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 66% 3.45M 1s 7800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% 3.19M 1s 7850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% 3.48M 1s 7900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% 13.7M 1s 7950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 68% 4.18M 1s 8000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 68% 1.28M 1s 8050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 69% 2.98M 1s 8100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 69% 10.5M 1s 8150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% 3.45M 1s 8200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% 3.00M 1s 8250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% 3.75M 1s 8300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 71% 3.11M 1s 8350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 71% 4.07M 1s 8400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 72% 3.18M 1s 8450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 72% 3.89M 1s 8500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% 3.33M 1s 8550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% 3.56M 1s 8600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% 3.09M 1s 8650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 74% 3.48M 1s 8700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 74% 3.73M 1s 8750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 75% 13.9M 1s 8800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 75% 2.11M 1s 8850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% 14.0M 1s 8900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% 4.04M 1s 8950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% 3.45M 1s 9000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 77% 3.92M 1s 9050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 77% 3.74M 1s 9100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 78% 3.61M 1s 9150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 78% 4.00M 1s 9200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% 3.53M 1s 9250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% 3.76M 1s 9300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% 4.11M 1s 9350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 80% 3.79M 1s 9400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 80% 13.9M 1s 9450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 81% 4.13M 1s 9500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 81% 3.52M 1s 9550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% 4.08M 1s 9600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% 3.45M 1s 9650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% 3.98M 1s 9700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 83% 3.66M 1s 9750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 83% 4.39M 1s 9800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 84% 3.58M 1s 9850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 84% 4.04M 1s 9900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% 3.71M 1s 9950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% 13.8M 1s 10000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% 2.21M 1s 10050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 86% 13.9M 1s 10100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 86% 4.09M 1s 10150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 87% 4.12M 0s 10200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 87% 2.91M 0s 10250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% 3.73M 0s 10300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% 1.51M 0s 10350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% 13.3M 0s 10400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 89% 2.42M 0s 10450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 89% 2.67M 0s 10500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 90% 3.77M 0s 10550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 90% 1.87M 0s 10600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% 3.78M 0s 10650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% 3.33M 0s 10700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% 3.95M 0s 10750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% 3.46M 0s 10800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% 3.48M 0s 10850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% 3.69M 0s 10900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% 1.92M 0s 10950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% 3.87M 0s 11000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% 3.74M 0s 11050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% 3.82M 0s 11100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% 3.16M 0s 11150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% 3.81M 0s 11200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% 3.59M 0s 11250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% 2.72M 0s 11300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% 1.88M 0s 11350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% 3.07M 0s 11400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% 3.76M 0s 11450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% 3.28M 0s 11500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% 3.52M 0s 11550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% 2.03M 0s 11600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% 3.59M 0s 11650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% 3.81M 0s 11700K . 100% 534K=3.8s 2011-09-06 15:57:32 (3.01 MB/s) - `/builds/builder/images/PharoCore13.zip' saved [11981893/11981893] Archive: /builds/builder/images/PharoCore13.zip inflating: /builds/builder/images/PharoCore-1.3.changes inflating: /builds/builder/images/PharoCore-1.3.image + /builds/builder/build13.sh -i gforgeCore13 -s update -s pharo/version -o PharoCore-1.3 [version] 1.3 #13301 + /builds/builder/build13.sh -i PharoCore-1.3 -s testrunner -s delHDLintReport -s runalltests -o PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests + zip -r PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.zip PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.changes PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.image updating: PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.changes (deflated 79%) updating: PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests.image (deflated 57%) + zip -r PharoCore-1.3.zip PharoCore-1.3/PharoCore-1.3.changes PharoCore-1.3/PharoV10.sources PharoCore-1.3/PharoCore-1.3.image updating: PharoCore-1.3/PharoCore-1.3.changes (deflated 79%) updating: PharoCore-1.3/PharoV10.sources (deflated 76%) updating: PharoCore-1.3/PharoCore-1.3.image (deflated 57%) + sh /builds/builder/pharo-shell-scripts/SavePharoCore13.sh Archiving artifacts Enregistrement des r?sultats des tests ERROR: Failed to archive test reports hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed: <https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/ws/> at hudson.remoting.Channel@15e264dd:pharo-build.lille.inria.fr at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:752) at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:738) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitParser.parse(JUnitParser.java:66) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver.parse(JUnitResultArchiver.java:108) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver.perform(JUnitResultArchiver.java:120) at hudson.tasks.BuildStepMonitor$1.perform(BuildStepMonitor.java:19) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.perform(AbstractBuild.java:601) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuild.java:580) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuild.java:558) at hudson.model.Build$RunnerImpl.post2(Build.java:158) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.post(AbstractBuild.java:528) at hudson.model.Run.run(Run.java:1264) at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:46) at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:88) at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:122) Caused by: hudson.util.IOException2: Failed to read <https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/ws/PharoCore-…> at hudson.tasks.junit.TestResult.parse(TestResult.java:198) at hudson.tasks.junit.TestResult.parse(TestResult.java:139) at hudson.tasks.junit.TestResult.<init>(TestResult.java:102) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitParser$ParseResultCallable.invoke(JUnitParser.java:95) at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitParser$ParseResultCallable.invoke(JUnitParser.java:70) at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2028) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:114) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48) at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:270) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) Caused by: org.dom4j.DocumentException: Error on line 288 of document file:///builds/workspace/Pharo%20Core%201.3/PharoCore-1.3-AfterRunningTests/Zinc-Tests-Test.xml : XML document structures must start and end within the same entity. Nested exception: XML document structures must start and end within the same entity. at org.dom4j.io.SAXReader.read(SAXReader.java:482) at org.dom4j.io.SAXReader.read(SAXReader.java:264) at hudson.tasks.junit.SuiteResult.parse(SuiteResult.java:94) at hudson.tasks.junit.TestResult.parse(TestResult.java:183) ... 14 more Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: XML document structures must start and end within the same entity. at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:195) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.fatalError(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:174) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:388) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLScanner.reportFatalError(XMLScanner.java:1414) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.endEntity(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:905) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.endEntity(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:605) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLEntityManager.endEntity(XMLEntityManager.java:1393) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLEntityScanner.load(XMLEntityScanner.java:1763) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLEntityScanner.skipChar(XMLEntityScanner.java:1416) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDriver.next(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:2792) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:648) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.java:140) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:511) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:808) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:737) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:119) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(AbstractSAXParser.java:1205) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:522) at org.dom4j.io.SAXReader.read(SAXReader.java:465) ... 17 more Description set:

2 4

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13302
by Marcus Denker Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

13302 ----- Issue 4634: Tools menu build by code from Deprecated13 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4634 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

1 0

[Pharo-project] Compiling code on a web request; non interactive compilation
by Nick Ager Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

Hi, I'm sending code from a web-based editor back into Pharo for compilation and trying to catch compilation errors and return them to the browser. I've created a notifier which implements #notify:at:in: and I pass an instance into the compiler in something like: compiler := Compiler new. compiler from: codeToCompile class: aClass context: nil notifying: notifier. compiler translate: codeToCompile readStream noPattern: false ifFail: [ ... ] Is there a better compiler API to use? I've noticed that I appear to have to mock additional methods in the notifier e.g. #selectFrom:to: and #selectionInterval, though still find that a morphic UI appears in my image asking for variable creation confirmation etc. I then tried using the NonInteractiveUIManager, but found my image quit with DNU on NonInteractiveUIManager>>#openDebuggerOn:context:label:contents:fullView:, which I duly implemented, but am starting to feel like there must be easier way. Have I missed something? Thanks Nick

2 2

Re: [Pharo-project] How to run cog on Linux
by Marcus Denker Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

On Sep 8, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 8 September 2011 11:45, Milan Mimica <milan.mimica(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8 September 2011 10:14, Dennis Schetinin <chaetal(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> But, from another end: Is there ready-to-use 64-bit Cog version for linux >>> available? I'm not sure I'll manage to build it myself (despite the fact I >> >> Maybe if we make enough pressure on the comunity... :) Heck, I'm going >> to port FFi or whatever it takes. >> > and JIT code generator, please :) and a X86-64 Version of NativeBoost. ;-) Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

1 0