- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20055
by Marcus Denker May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

20055 ----- Issue 5817: privShrinkingProcess with new KMPragmaKeymapBuilder http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5817 Issue 5815: Break dependency between traits and ring http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5815 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

1 0

[Pharo-project] NativeBoost help
by Luc Fabresse May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

Hi Igor and other NB Gurus, A group of students is trying to use NativeBoost to wrap the OpenCV C image library. The problem we are facing is that the function cvSize return a struct. typedef struct { int width; int height; } CvSize; CV_INLINE CvSize cvSize( int width, int height ); But the NBExternalStructure seems to not support that if I understood correctly. NBExternalStructure>>coerceReturn: gen " ... should we support handling return of external structures? " self error: 'returning pointer to structure?' Did I miss something? Any idea or workaround? Thanks, Luc

5 17

Re: [Pharo-project] PBE1 update to Pharo 1.4 Re: Some Newbie problems
by Marcus Denker May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

On May 7, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Peredur wrote: > El 06/05/12 23:27, Ben Coman escribiÃ³: >> That would be welcome. I'll move further discussion to sbe-discussion(a)iam.unibe.ch list. Announce yourself there also. >> >> cheers -ben >> > > I tried, but the list rejected me: > > You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has > been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages are > being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at > > sbe-discussion-owner(a)iam.unibe.ch > you need to first subscribe to the list. It reject all mails from people not subscribed. https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/sbe-discussion -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

1 0

[Pharo-project] Command Line Handling
by Sean P. DeNigris May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

I've played a lot with the new command line argument handling. Here's a few thoughts: * I think we should not allow the use of raw handler names (e.g. 'eval') and restrict ourselves to flags. For example, disallow 'eval' and stick to '-e' or '--evaluate'. The raw name introduces ambiguity in parsing the command line, especially since custom commands can be added at will that may conflict and see next item... * The current implementation chooses the single matching handler with the highest priority, but usually command line tools may have multiple non-conflicting flags * The priority concept seems premature. It adds complexity and confusion (the handler for a specific flag is not obvious because it emerges from an interaction of all the handlers). Maybe a registry would be better? A dictionary could just map flags to handlers e.g. -e -> EvalHandler, --evaluate -> EvalHandler, etc. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Command-Line-Handling-tp4612779.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 3

[Pharo-project] Question regarding: #addYellowButtonMenuItemsTo:event:
by Martin Drautzburg May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

Hello all I am trying to build a nested menu and #addYellowButtonMenuItemsTo:event: seemed to be just the thing I need. But it gives me troubles: It builds the menu starting with the outermost morph an then adds submenus for the submorphs under the mouse. If I understand this correctly, then the menu- construction comes to halt when there is a submorph, which does not want to contribute to the menu, even when a sub-submorph wants to contribute something. I have this situation and the submorph in question is a plain Morph and I hesitate to create an extra class for it. Wouldn't it be better to let #addYellowButtonMenuItemsTo:event: find ALL Morphs which might want to contribute to the menu? Is there a better way of constructing menus with several contributors, or should I roll my own? -- Martin

2 1

[Pharo-project] Some Newbie problems
by Peredur May 6, 2012

May 6, 2012

Hi, I'm trying to work my way through the Pharo by example book on my Ubuntu 12.04 LTS box. Unfortunately, things in the book don't look like they do on my setup. For example, I can't work out what the key combination is to get the 'Morphic Halo'. I can get it from a menu, but not from a key press combination. Also, calling: BouncingAtomsMorph new openInWorld doesn't work. I just get an error message saying that there is no such object. I thought these problems might be due to me having the standard image instead of the Pharo by Example image. So I downloaded that image but when I call Pharo on that image: $ ./pharo ../Resources/PBE.image I just get a segmentation fault. I'm a complete newbie (but an experienced programmer in a variety of OO and other languages), so if anyone could shed any light on this, I'd be very grateful. Thanks Peter -- *Peter Bradley* peredur.net <http://www.peredur.net>

7 15

[Pharo-project] [newbies] How can I diagnose kinetic scrolling screen flicker?
by Martin Drautzburg May 6, 2012

May 6, 2012

Hello all, in my (first) pharo programm, I have a pane with apx 100 Morphs. The pane can be zoomed and scrolled both vertically and horizontally. The horizontal scrolling means scrolling time and is self-written. I implemented some sort of kinetic scrolling using the mouse wheel, where a scroll destination is set and in a step method I halve the distance to the destination with each step. This looks kind of nice, but not nice enough. Scrolling is not as smooth as I had hoped. Sometimes there is a delay between the wheel move and the display actually showing some motion. Also I have the impression, that not all parts of the pane are redrawn at the same time. Morphs which are exactly below each other, appear minimally skewed during the scroll. Strange enough the zooming, which has to do about the same underlying geometry calculations is a lot more snappy (but not kinetic). Likewise the vertical scrolling which used a StandardScrollPane appears more snappy. I looks like using a stepper is the root of the problem. I just could not figure out where the time goes. I put a MessageTally into the step method, only to find out, that doing 1000 steps takes less than a second. So the problem must be elsewehere. Any ideas would be much appreciated. -- Martin

3 4

[Pharo-project] Explore Pointers ad startup errors
by Davide Varvello May 6, 2012

May 6, 2012

Hi, Â I'm working on a seaside image. I stopped the zinc server before saving and quitting but unfortunately, when I reopen my image, the server is on and listening. So I inspected ZnZincServerAdaptor and tried to kill references using "explore pointers". Unfortunately I killed too much; now, when I start the image I have a startup error, it seems SmalltalkImage try to startup WAServerManager but I can't figure out why. Hints? Thanks Davide Â Â ---- - Come avere 48 servizi a portata di mano senza alzare un dito (dalla tastiera :-) Â Â Oltre il Passaparola - Blog: Cambia il Tempo

2 3

May 6, 2012

Hi guys here is a digest of a discussion in VW mailing-list. would be nice to have somebody looking and thinking about that. For example the work of Markus Gaelli for sorting falling tests was lost and this is a pity. Stef ------------------------------------------------------------ You might also want to look at Assessments (bundle of the same name in the public Store repository, MIT license). It offers a much more flexible implementation of a basic test framework, which is then used to execute tests from three different variants of SUnit (SUnit, SUnitToo, and SUnitVM) without needing to modify or override or reparent existing test classes. In addition, it implements test based validation, as well as test based benchmarks and performance measurements. For references, see Chapter 4 of "A Mentoring Course on Smalltalk" here: http://www.lulu.com/shop/search.ep?contributorId=441247 as well as several conference talk slides about these, for example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeLGRjQqRf0 and also see for example the paper Extreme Validation here: http://www.caesarsystems.com/resources/caesarsystems/files/Extreme_Validati… Assessments' flexible architecture also allows extending Assessments without having to override the framework itself. This is a problem with extending SUnit, and it will lead to various extensions being incompatible with each other. > The 'Unit Testing' Chapter of doc/ToolGuide.pdf has a section at the > end 'Extensions and Variants of SUnit in VisualWorks' which covers > the other tools. Briefly: > > - SUnit, with VW UI RBSUnitExtensions is the cross-dialect utility > we know and love > > - SUnitToo, with VW UI SUnitToo(ls), is a mature tool created by > Travis Griggs. It is VW-specific and permits exploration of > VW-specific ideas for SUnit that are not - or not yet - in the > cross-dialect framework. (Some ideas trialled in SUnitToo, and in > Andres' Assessments framework, have migrated to SUnit and are now > also in Pharo, VASmalltalk and Dolphin SUnit. Others may always be > too VW-specific, or may remain an area of debate.) > > - The SUnit2SU2-Bridge parcel reparents SUnit tests as SUnitToo > tests when the bridge is deployed (done automatically on loading the > parcel and can be done programmatically) and back again when the > bridge is retracted (done automatically on unloading and can be done > programmatically). This can be useful if for example you want to > keep your tests SUnit test, e.g. because the utility is > cross-dialect or for easier historic comparison, but want to use > SUnitToo(ls) UI or wish to run these tests in a single suite with > other SUnitToo tests. > > There is a very high degree of similarity between the frameworks: a > test case should run the same under either. Some minor differences are: > > - SUnitToo(ls) has an image memory of the last result of run > tests: open a fresh window on a test and you will see it with an > icon of the last-time-run result. RBSunitExtension remembers only > within each window: open another RB, or move off the test pane in > the same RB, and the knowledge of test outcomes is discarded. > > - SUnit has optimistic locking of TestResources by default, with > an optional pessimistic locking pattern. Thus, for example, if your > system can only be logged in to one database at a time and your > overall test suite includes two database login resources that login > to two databases, you must tag them as belonging to a > CompetingResource set. SUnitToo has pessimistic locking and (IIRC) > no pattern for escape from it at this time. Thus you need never tag > competing resources, but if you have a resource that takes 5 minutes > to setUp and tearDown (e.g. installing/uninstalling a complex > product), and use it in a suite of thousands of tests with tens of > other resources (e.g. your code integration suite), then SUnitToo > could turn that 5 minutes into an hour and 5 minutes as it was > repeatedly tornDown and setUp again in pessimistically-calculated > competing resource sets. > > - SUnit provides TestCase API on TestResources also, so e.g. if > code in a test case's setUp method starts being too slow as test > numbers grow, it can be refactored to a test resource's setUp > method, to be run once per suite instead of once per test, without > needing to be rewritten. > > - SUnitToo randomises each test run. On the plus side, this > means repeated runs may well find order-dependent errors that > Sunit's consistent run order does not expose. On the minus side, > the run order is not remembered or recreatable, so just such > order-dependent failures may haunt you as intermittent failures. > (FYI I wish to add a randomise-run-order feature to SUnit but with > memory of the order and only used when the user selects it.) > > Travis may be able to list other differences. Generally, the intent > is to keep behaviour the same except for areas where ideas for > developing the frameworks are being trialled. > > HTH > Niall Ross FYI, the mention in my earlier email of SUnit having taken some ideas from Assessments, as well as from SUnitToo, refers to some of these ways of extending. For example, the 'Extensions and Variants of SUnit in VisualWorks' subsection (in the test chapter of doc/ToolsGuide.pdf) mentions the pattern for skipping tests. This is an example of using ClassifiedTestResult, which owes its inspiration to Assessments. In 7.9, the RBSUnitExtensions tool allows plugin of TestSuite subclasses, by doing RBSUnitExtension suiteClass: MyTestSuite. During 7.10, we expect to publish some examples of TestSuite subclasses (and TestResult subclasses referenced by them) in the OR so people can use the above to experiment, and maybe some in the community will also do so: thus we can find out what subclassing patterns may be best, so make any (very minor, purely refactoring) changes in the top-level framework that would help support them. You are right that SUnitToo(ls) gives better visual feedback than RBSUnitExtensions (having the SUnit2SU2-Bridge, so we can always use SUnitToo UI for SUnit tests just by loading it, has made me careless about porting these UI features - I will try to do that for the next release). By contrast, RBSUnitExtensions is a bit ahead when it comes to handling tests that are extensions in other packages (maybe those features will also get ported).

3 2

[Pharo-project] RPackage and Monticello are dependent on each other
by Pavel Krivanek May 6, 2012

May 6, 2012

Hi, we have small dependency problem. The RPackage is currently dependent on Monticello and Monticello is dependent on RPackage. This makes them unable to load them to Pharo Kernel. I suppose this will fix the worst: MCPackage organization renameCategory: '*RPackage-Core' toBe: '*RPackage-SystemIntegration'. I will open an issue. Cheers, -- Pavel

2 2