April 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] XML and DTD
by Torsten Bergmann April 29, 2011

April 29, 2011

AFAIK there are various possibilities to check an XML: a) using an internal DTD b) using an external DTD (in a file) c) using an external schema d) mixing internal dtd and external dtd To validate using an internal DTD (a) the validation on the parser has to be set to true. Thats all, at least in Java: DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(); factory.setValidating(true); Havent tried the Pharo implementation, dont know if it is complete or not. Maybe a) is at least supported. Only Michael RÃ¼ger (Impara.de) may be able to tell you since he wrote the original code AFAIK. You can also dig through the code or try an example to see if the setting #isValidating: has any effect. Did you check the unit tests on squeaksource.com/XMLSupport Maybe they are useful too. Bye T. -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

2 1

[Pharo-project] Explicit control of Parallel execution in Smalltalk ? (was Counting Messages as a Proxy for Average Execution Time in Pharo)
by Nicolas Cellier April 29, 2011

April 29, 2011

2011/4/29 Stefan Marr <pharo(a)stefan-marr.de>: > > On 29 Apr 2011, at 01:07, Nicolas Cellier wrote: >>>> However, as I understand it, it's entirely up to user to write code >>>> exploiting parallel Process explicitly right ? >>> Sure, you have to do: n times: [ [ 1 expensiveComputation. ] fork ]. >>> >>> I don't belief in holy grails or silver bullets. >>> Automatic parallelization is something nice for the kids, like Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny... >> >> Unless your hobby is oriented toward functional languages maybe... >> But I just know enough of it to now shut up ;) > Would be nice, but that is also a fairy tale. > > The best we have today, in terms of being 'easily' automatically scheduleable are data-flow/stream languages. Things like StreamIT or Lucid have interesting properties, but well, its still a search for the holly grail. > > Best regards > Stefan > Interestingly, I was thinking of Xtreams as an obvious Smalltalk test case for parallelism. But of course choosing manually an optimal multi-Process implementation is far from easy... Reading http://cag.lcs.mit.edu/commit/papers/06/gordon-asplos06-slides.pdf reinforce my feeling that it shall not be optimized manually, and that user shall not design/assign Process directly. I don't know what the right abstraction would be in Smalltalk though such that a VM could do it, and neither do I understand how StreamIT solves the optimization, but thanks for these interesting clues. Nicolas > > -- > Stefan Marr > Software Languages Lab > Vrije Universiteit Brussel > Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium > http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr > Phone: +32 2 629 2974 > Fax: Â +32 2 629 3525 > > >

3 3

[Pharo-project] XML and DTD
by Olivier Auverlot April 29, 2011

April 29, 2011

Hi, Now, I'm playing with XML-Parser. It's a funny game but I have a little question. How to validate a XML file with a DTD ? Thank for your help. Best regards Olivier ;-) www.auverlot.fr

4 4

[Pharo-project] for Rpackage status, questions, path
by StÃ©phane Ducasse April 29, 2011

April 29, 2011

Hi guys here is the status: - I have all tests green but but but - I have plenty of code to review about the integration with MC and understand since cyrille's goal was to make sure that RPackage can be used in place of PackageInfo and using the same subpackage semantics. Now having that put a lot of ugly code in RPackage and we have to do really strange things to make it work. If you want to have a look you can load the latest configurationOfRPackage and load version 30 and check a bit Gofer new squeaksource: 'PharoTaskForces'; package: 'ConfigurationOfRPackage'; load. ConfigurationOfRPackage project load: '3.0' run the tests look for self flag: #stef self flag: #cyrille - I would like to review all this code and see if we can improve it to the point where this is ok to keep it or just do what we decided: one category = one package: no submatching. Now I have also a problem and metacello can help me. RB is one of the heavy/sometimes even single user of some packageInfo API and I would like to migrate RB alltogether with RPackage. So mariano may be I could work on a configurationOfRB for me. What do you think: I could load OB version for 1.3 RB version (we mark a stable version for 1.3) and I work with another one for 11.4 for example? Mariano could you give me hand on that? Stef

1 0

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13176
by Marcus Denker April 29, 2011

April 29, 2011

13176 ----- Issue 4123: ifNotNilDo: --> ifNotNil: Issue 4122: Fix #isDeprecated Issue 4121: move more deprecated methods to package Deprecated13 Issue 4072: Deprecate or fix PCXReadWriter Issue 4119: MorphTreeMorph rows height and color problem Issue 3860: Overzealous arithmetic collection removal -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] [TODO] 1.2.2
by Marcus Denker April 28, 2011

April 28, 2011

On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:44 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > BTW...do we need a Pharo 1.2.2 ? can't we directly release Pharo 1.3 ? > The idea was to release 1.2.2 very very soon... while 1.3, who knows when? Not many people are actually pushing to close the 1.3 open issues... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

[Pharo-project] [TODO] 1.2.2
by Marcus Denker April 28, 2011

April 28, 2011

Core: Failing Tests: NONE Open Issues: NONE Full: - Issues: 4. Related to OB: 3 OB2: 1. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone=1.2.2-DevImage - the build of Full is broken since April, 14th (2 weeks). A Mail is sent automatically on each failiing build (minimum 1/day) Result: No action. Most important next step: - Fix Build of Full. I really woner why we have the Full image... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

3 3

Re: [Pharo-project] [TODO] 1.2.2
by Marcus Denker April 28, 2011

April 28, 2011

On Apr 28, 2011, at 10:50 PM, laurent laffont wrote: > - Is it possible to revert to last successful build ? > It just started failing with no change done. (phase of the moon...) > - Seems related to OB, but I see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3842 , so I suppose Hudson scripts should be updated but few people have access ? > possibly related. It was fixed for 1.3, but not 1.2 > - Indeed OB maintenance process looks really problematic > We need *one* browser. Maintaining two makes no sense. > - Which mailing-list the mail is sent ? Haven't seen it on pharo-dev (but inbox full of mails ahhhhhhh) > this one. > Laurent > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > Core: > > Failing Tests: NONE > Open Issues: NONE > > Full: > > - Issues: 4. Related to OB: 3 OB2: 1. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone=1.2.2-DevImage > - the build of Full is broken since April, 14th (2 weeks). > A Mail is sent automatically on each failiing build (minimum 1/day) > Result: No action. > > Most important next step: > - Fix Build of Full. > > I really woner why we have the Full image... > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

2 1

[Pharo-project] [TODO] 1.3
by Marcus Denker April 28, 2011

April 28, 2011

Core Failing Tests: NONE Open Issues: 23 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone=1.3 Related to Transcript: 8 Full Failing Tests: 37. Related to Nile: 30. https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%201.3/lastCompletedBuild/t… Open Issues: 9. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.3-DevImage Next most important Step: -> fix Transcript. -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

3 3

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13175
by Marcus Denker April 28, 2011

April 28, 2011

13175 ----- Issue 4118: move some more cleanup into #cleanUp methods Issue 4117: Small Uniclass related cleanup Issue 4111: GraphicFontSettings class dnu theme Issue 4109: Do we need #initializedIntance? -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0