Re: [Pharo-project] [TODO] 1.2.2
On Apr 28, 2011, at 10:50 PM, laurent laffont wrote:
- Is it possible to revert to last successful build ?
It just started failing with no change done. (phase of the moon...)
- Seems related to OB, but I see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3842 , so I suppose Hudson scripts should be updated but few people have access ?
possibly related. It was fixed for 1.3, but not 1.2
- Indeed OB maintenance process looks really problematic
We need *one* browser. Maintaining two makes no sense.
- Which mailing-list the mail is sent ? Haven't seen it on pharo-dev (but inbox full of mails ahhhhhhh)
this one.
Laurent
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
Core:
Failing Tests: NONE Open Issues: NONE
Full:
- Issues: 4. Related to OB: 3 OB2: 1. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone=1.2.2-DevImage - the build of Full is broken since April, 14th (2 weeks). A Mail is sent automatically on each failiing build (minimum 1/day) Result: No action.
Most important next step: - Fix Build of Full.
I really woner why we have the Full image...
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
We need *one* browser. Maintaining two makes no sense.
yes but saying it will not make it happen. Benjamin worked hard and this is promising. I'm working on rpackage to make sure we can get nautilus but this is not trivial. And the more I program the more I'm convinced that we should not be compatible with MC subpackage semantics. stef
participants (2)
-
Marcus Denker -
Stéphane Ducasse