November 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Issue 3353 in pharo: CommentReference
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Status: Accepted Owner: Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo New issue 3353 by Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo: CommentReference http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3353 Maybe CommentReference should have a method #selector to be polymorphic.

1 2

Re: [Pharo-project] How to update Pharo
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

tony you should take the latest unstable image (1.2) you can find it at http://pharo-project.org/pharo-download or https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/?group_id=1299 stef On Nov 29, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Tony Fleig wrote: > In the document at: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/HowToContribute, I find > > â¢ Download the latest Pharo image from http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Downloads?tm=2. > â¢ Launch the fresh image and load the latest updates by using the option in the menu. > > The Pharo-1.1 One-Click image has no "update" option in the menu. Should I be using a different image? > > How would I go about updating the One-Click image "manually"? > > Regards, > TF >

2 1

[Pharo-project] Issue 3357 in pharo: Enable silent / verbose updates again...
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Status: Fixed Owner: marcus.denker Labels: Milestone-1.2 New issue 3357 by marcus.denker: Enable silent / verbose updates again... http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3357 ... for hudson. -> updates are loaded verbose by default -> beSilent can be used (e.g. by hudson) Attachments: UpdateStreamer.1.cs 1.9 KB

1 1

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12261
by Marcus Denker Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

12261 ----- Issue 3357: Enable silent / verbose updates again... -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

[Pharo-project] Issue 3352 in pharo: Proposal (with code) for adding multipart/alternative MIME support to MailMessage and WAEmailMessage
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 3352 by tony.fleig: Proposal (with code) for adding multipart/alternative MIME support to MailMessage and WAEmailMessage http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3352 Pharo image: Pharo Pharo core version: 1.1-11411 Virtual machine used: n/a Class browser used (if applicable): n/a I added the attached methods to MailMessage and modified one method in WAEmailMessage to allow me to create and send multipart/alternative and multipart/mixed email messages from Pharo/Seaside. My need was to send text/plain and text/html multipart/alternative messages for account registration confirmation. SUnit tests are included for all the new methods. I don't know precisely how to contribute this code. I have signed no agreement yet. I'm hoping that by posting it the feature may find its way into Pharo at some point. If the code is unacceptable for some reason, I am willing to make whatever changes are needed. Example using the new functionality: | msg ssmsg | msg := TFMailMessage empty. msg addAlternativePart: 'This is plain text.' contentType: 'text/plain'; addAlternativePart: '<html><head></head><body>This is html.</body></html>' contentType: 'text/html'. ssmsg := msg seasideMailMessageFrom: 'fleig(a)mailserver.com' to: 'example(a)mailserver.com' subject: 'Test multipart message'. ssmsg plainMessage. Produces: 'From: fleig(a)mailserver.com To: example(a)mailserver.com Subject: Test multipart message Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:46:18 -0800 content-type: multipart/alternative;boundary="==CelesteAttachment50460==" mime-version: 1.0 --==CelesteAttachment50460== Content-type: text/plain This is plain text. --==CelesteAttachment50460== Content-type: text/html <html><head></head><body>This is html.</body></html> --==CelesteAttachment50460==-- ' Attachments: MailMessage-addAlternativePart.st 257 bytes MailMessage-seasideMailMessageFromtosubject.st 578 bytes MailMessage-makeMultipartwith.st 888 bytes WAStringEmailBodyTest-testMultipart.st 1.4 KB MailMessage-addPartcontentType.st 446 bytes MailMessage-addMixedPartcontentType.st 456 bytes MailMessage-addAlternativePartcontentType.st 468 bytes MailMessage-addMixedPart.st 243 bytes

1 9

[Pharo-project] [OT] Smalltalk commitment
by Torsten Bergmann Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Interesting read, especially on commitment that Smalltalk requires: http://blog.lostlake.org/index.php?/archives/14-Smalltalk-Language-of-the-g… -- GRATIS! Movie-FLAT mit Ã¼ber 300 Videos. Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome

1 0

[Pharo-project] <script language="smalltalk">
by Torsten Bergmann Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

>How easy/hard to integrate smalltalk VM into browsers? It it feasible? You need to run as a plugin in the browser, so the VM has to be in process (DLL on windows instead of exe for instance) >I know, there is (or was) a Squeak browser plugin. Yes there was/is a Squeak ActiveX control for InternetExplorer and a Netscape plugin for NS compatible browsers. Dont know about the maintenance state... As you already said ... they are more like "applet providers" in Java. AFAIK they are not interfacing with the scripting engines of the browser. >While i thinking, that it would be cool to use smalltalk directly in >pages, as javascript. That would mean to run on the client in the browser and mean to: - build a small downloadable VM as a plugin into the browser since the plugin itself is browser dependent and OS dependent you have to build one for each of the major browsers and OS's on the market, Dont know about the other browsers but for Internet Explorer you would have to implement the ActiveScripting Engine COM interfaces. This would mean you could then use it in any application that is an ActiveX scripting host (like IE, Word, Windows Scripting shell, ...) and you get the <script language="smalltalk"> for free in IE. For instance vbscript.dll and jscript.dll are done this way. I think ActivePerl, ActivePython, ... from Activestate.com are implemented similar. You also have to think about securing your VM since typically a script executed in a webbrowser should not access files/clipboard/etc. otherwise it would be easy to harm computers from a website. - build a small (kernel) image that provides basic functionality, comes with the VM above and and accepts the scripts to run them - for the bare bone scripting part you should check out "squeaksource.com/Sapphire" I'm sure it could be done but you would need time and good knowledge of C/C++, Squeak VM creation, Scripting, ... Question left is why you want all this. Instead of Smalltalk you can use JavaScript for the browser/client part of your app. JavaScript is very dynamic and meanwhile supported and fast enough in nearly any browser.... Bye T. -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 €/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

6 13

[Pharo-project] MorphTreeMorph
by Benjamin Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Hi guys, I had a little problem about MorphTreeMorph>>#setSelectedNodeItemList: setSelectedNodeItemList: aNodeItemCollection | keptSelectedMorphList | self selectedMorphList removeAll. "Don't work directly with selectedMorphList because for very long list, #drawOn: is time consuming" keptSelectedMorphList := selectedMorphList. selectedMorphList := #(). keptSelectedMorphList addAll: (self nodeMorphsWithAllNodeItems: aNodeItemCollection). ------- I break here ------- selectedMorphList := keptSelectedMorphList. lastClickedMorph ifNil: [lastClickedMorph := selectedMorphList ifEmpty: [nil] ifNotEmpty: [selectedMorphList last]]. self selectionChanged. Due to the break, selectedMorphList is an empty array, and when I try to resend the message, removeAll from the start is not understood ... Is there a reason why selectedMorphList is set as an empty array ? Cheers, Ben

2 1

[Pharo-project] CompiledMethod copy
by Gabriel HernÃ¡n Barbuto Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Hi I've been trying to duplicate a CompiledMethod and finally I've been able to do it. I've thought about integrating the copy code back into the image. But the comment in CompiledMethod's veryDeepCopyWith: made me thought if the change would be correct. veryDeepCopyWith: deepCopier "Return self. I am always shared. Do not record me. Only use this for blocks. Normally methodDictionaries should not be copied this way." On the other hand. CompiledMethod uses Object's copy which makes a shallow copy of the receiver followed by a postCopy. CompiledMethod doesn't define any of these methods. So I am not sure if they are always shared or not as the comment says. I wonder if it's correct to put this way of copying a CompiledMethod in copy. What do you think about it? Bests Gabriel

1 0

[Pharo-project] Issue 3270 in pharo: fix xor: to work with blocks and booleans
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Status: Fixed Owner: marcus.denker Labels: Milestone-1.2 New issue 3270 by marcus.denker: fix xor: to work with blocks and booleans http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3270 ... so that it works like or: (calling #value on the argument. This means it will continue to work with booleans, too). Attachments: XOr.1.cs 903 bytes

3 2