November 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3247 in pharo: Remodel Text Constants
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 30, 2010

Nov. 30, 2010

Comment #16 on issue 3247 by Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo: Remodel Text Constants http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3247 A new version of TextConstants is available which patch on the fly methods which invoke TextSharedInformation. If some people could test it, it could be great ^^ (when I've done some tests, there was no problem) Thx to Jannik for his help :)

1 4

Re: [Pharo-project] Block semantics ....
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Nov. 30, 2010

Nov. 30, 2010

James I do not have the time but I have some slides on showing the difference between statically scoped lisp function and dynamically one. This illustrates the funargs problem but probably you get access to that on wikipedia. with block the object you refers from within a block may live longer than the method defining the block so you have to pay attention. Stef On Nov 29, 2010, at 9:43 PM, James Ladd wrote: > Hi Eliot, > > I was suspecting you might respond, you really know your stuff. > > I think I'm more confused now that before but in a good way. > I have more information thank to you. > > My need to fully understand blocks is to implement them in Redline. > > Maybe it will be sufficient to 'limit' the use of a block with a > return to the method in which is was defined? > ie: Method A can define the block and send it as an argument, but once > method A has been exited, the block is no longer valid, at least not > the return part. > > Does this appear most 'like' how blocks are handled in Pharo? > > Rgs, James. > >

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] ConfigurationOfMocketry + Help
by laurent laffont Nov. 30, 2010

Nov. 30, 2010

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, I am very glad to your work. > > I try configuration in pharo1.1. Loaded without problem. And Mocketry tests > green. > > Why you add SMock to Core group? > Because I'm ignorant :) What is SMock exactly ? Indeed I've never used Mocketry but I want to package existing mocking frameworks for Pharo. > SMock only needed for MocketryTests. And if you need mocks just use > Mocketry. > I think SMock should has separate configuration > You mean ConfigurationOfSMock ? > > I added you to Mocketry project. > Thank you Laurent > > Best regards, > Denis > > 2010/11/29 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> > > Hi, >> >> I've created a ConfigurationOfMocketry + HelpSystem help (package >> Mocketry-Help). >> >> Actually all is my personnal repository >> http://www.squeaksource.com/LaurentLSandbox. >> >> Johan, Denis can you check these packages ? Then I will >> put ConfigurationOfMocketry in MetacelloRepository. >> >> Can I commit Mocketry package with Help in Mocketry repository ? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Laurent Laffont >> >> Pharo Smalltalk Screencasts: http://www.pharocasts.com/ >> Blog: http://magaloma.blogspot.com/ >> > >

1 0

[Pharo-project] Changesets with LF/CRLF instead of CR?
by Stefan Marr Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Hi: Is there an easy way to have change sets filed out with LF instead of the horribly incompatible CR? And well, how do I convince the import to accept my change sets? Related to that, what is the status of this GSoC Project http://gsoc2010.esug.org/projects/git-mercurial is that related to http://www.squeaksource.com/Git? Thanks a lot Stefan -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525

2 2

Re: [Pharo-project] Block semantics ....
by James Ladd Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Hi Eliot, I was suspecting you might respond, you really know your stuff. I think I'm more confused now that before but in a good way. I have more information thank to you. My need to fully understand blocks is to implement them in Redline. Maybe it will be sufficient to 'limit' the use of a block with a return to the method in which is was defined? ie: Method A can define the block and send it as an argument, but once method A has been exited, the block is no longer valid, at least not the return part. Does this appear most 'like' how blocks are handled in Pharo? Rgs, James.

2 1

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12263
by Marcus Denker Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

12263 ----- Issue 3184: ImageSegmentTestExport has test errors -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3184 in pharo: ImageSegmentTestExport has test errors
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3184 by adrian.lienhard: ImageSegmentTestExport has test errors http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3184 Attached change fixes the problem. In addition the test #testSubclassInstanceVariableNames is also fixed since it suffered from the same issue. The reason is a very recent change in #nameinEnvironment:subclassOf:type:instanceVariableNames:classVariableNames:poolDictionaries:category:unsafe: Attachments: ImageSegmentTestExportFIx.1.cs 1.9 KB

1 1

[Pharo-project] Issue 3355 in pharo: Clean of RecentMessageList
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

Status: Fixed Owner: Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo New issue 3355 by Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo: Clean of RecentMessageList http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3355 A fix is in PharoTaskForces

1 1

[Pharo-project] [ANN 1.2] pre-built 1.2#12261
by Marcus Denker Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/28006/PharoCore-1.2-12261.zip -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12262
by Marcus Denker Nov. 29, 2010

Nov. 29, 2010

12262 ----- Issue 3353: CommentReference ... testing Hudson auto-update... :-) -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0