April 2009 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10273 fixTemps and sender
by StÃ©phane Ducasse April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

Hi all here is a better version of fixTemps (empty). I fixed some of the senders but not all. since apparently for some collections this is not immediate (postBlockCopy protocols). You are invited (lukas :)) to have a look at what I did :) Stef

2 2

[Pharo-project] kind of pharo joke
by StÃ©phane Ducasse April 13, 2009

April 13, 2009

senders of scrapsBook :) Stef

1 0

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10275 PageSorterBookMorph removal
by StÃ©phane Ducasse April 13, 2009

April 13, 2009

Another step in the right direction. Soon bookmorph and friend (URLMorph, SqueakPage.....). Stef

1 0

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10274 SplitJoin with Green tests
by StÃ©phane Ducasse April 13, 2009

April 13, 2009

Stef

1 0

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10271
by StÃ©phane Ducasse April 13, 2009

April 13, 2009

Splijoin fixed (I hope) fixing [: each | -> [:each | in core. Stef

1 1

[Pharo-project] :) New Neil Young
by StÃ©phane Ducasse April 13, 2009

April 13, 2009

Fork in the Road :) Stef

1 0

[Pharo-project] status of split join in pharo
by Oscar Nierstrasz April 13, 2009

April 13, 2009

Hi Folks, What's the status of split and join? http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 I need them for a project and since they are not there yet, I have gone back to RubyShards. http://squeaksource.com/RubyShards/ Keith, do you think this can be integrated into Pharo already, or does it need some work still? (I think our implementation is not particularly efficient, but it should be serviceable.) Cheers, - on

3 24

April 13, 2009

'- ArrayTest green after closure revertion. - Issue 712: Added PackageInfo class>>existPackageNamed: - Issue 733: integrate splitJoin: - Issue 734: deprecating some text method after unicode'. - 566: atRandom ... stef

1 0

April 13, 2009

> - Issue 730 SUnitGui > - do not consider package declarations from superclasses > - filter the package declaration from the coverage set > - added the method TestCase>>#packageNamesUnderTest that can be > overridden in TestCase sub-classes to let the test runner > automatically know what code to instrument > - Issue 519: Can't pass a script to the VM > - Issue 731 Scriptloader add FFI loading as convenience method for > easy loading > - Issue 622: there is a deprecated method call when using the method > finder > - Issue 732 numberOfDigits > - Issue 728: isLiteralSymbol broken by closure merge > > > Please check that everything is ok. > Thanks > > Stef And MonticelloGUI also integrated

1 0

[Pharo-project] [on] why can't I write on a WriteStream on an OrderedCollection?
by Oscar Nierstrasz April 13, 2009

April 13, 2009

Can anyone explain to me why this works fine: ((WriteStream on: (Array new)) nextPut: #foo) contents. but this doesn't? ((WriteStream on: (OrderedCollection new)) nextPut: #foo) contents. The debugger shows that WriteStream>>nextPut: invokes WriteStream>>pastEndPut: which invokes at:put: on the collection. This is ok for an array, but not for an OrderedCollection, as OrderedCollection>>at:put: explicitly states it cannot be used to append stuff to the end of the collection. Is it a bug in WriteStream that it sends at:put:, or does it just not make sense to have a WriteStream on an Ordered Collection? (This is related to the split and join methods -- because of this limitation, an OrderedCollection cannot be used as a joiner, it seems.) - on

5 5