- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

CI does not finish (PR 309)
by Torsten Bergmann Sept. 29, 2017

Sept. 29, 2017

For whatever reason the CI jobs for PR's to Pharo 7 runs endless and never finishes. It run well a few days ago ... https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2… Any ideas?

3 4

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #162: 20205-wrong-comment-of-withIndexDo
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 29, 2017

Sept. 29, 2017

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #162 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #317 was integrated: "20205-wrong-comment-of-withIndexDo" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/317 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20205 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #163: 20465-Odd-behaviour-of-flatCollect-on-Dictionary-
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 29, 2017

Sept. 29, 2017

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #163 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #320 was integrated: "20465-Odd-behaviour-of-flatCollect-on-Dictionary-" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/320 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20465 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #161: 20170-Better-collect-method-comment
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 29, 2017

Sept. 29, 2017

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #161 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #319 was integrated: "20170-Better-collect-method-comment" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/319 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20170 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Maybe better pinning messages? (inspired by [Pinning Objects in Pharo])
by Denis Kudriashov Sept. 28, 2017

Sept. 28, 2017

Hi. We now have very generic message names: - pin - unpin - setPinned: - isPinned Problem that they collide with possible domain related names. For example I implemented pinning of tabs in Calypso and I found that I overrides #pin and #isPinned messages. Then I fix it with different names. Probably menus also uses pin word but without overrides What you think about renaming pinning messages? Something like: - pinMemory - unpinMemory - isMemoryPinned - setPinnedMemory: - pinMemoryDuring: (if we will introduce it) I think it is easy to do now because not much code uses pinning

15 30

Epicea wishlist
by Stephane Ducasse Sept. 28, 2017

Sept. 28, 2017

Hi martin I'm missing two features: - keep the filter across session because this is boring to have to redo them all over. - a search for entities accross session. - a search inside a session For example I was looking for all the changes I did to the UI part of my application but I was doing many development loading different unrelated package and saving after. Right now you can restrict to view changes but only if you have a first entity of the package for example so you have to look first is there an entity of this package. Stef

2 2

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #160: 20426-Better-pin-messages
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 28, 2017

Sept. 28, 2017

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #160 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #285 was integrated: "20426-Better-pin-messages" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/285 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20426 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

STON question :)
by Stephane Ducasse Sept. 27, 2017

Sept. 27, 2017

Hi Sven For Moose we are wondering if we can use STON to save/load models instead of MSE. - I'm sure we can :) Now my little friends would like to kill two or three birds with the same stone :) Would it be possible to use STON to handle cycles but to generate JSON compatible in the following sense: Class { "id": 123, "name" : "A" } => { "id": 123, "type" : "Class", "name" : "A" } It means that we could be able to output an extra field and when we read that the materialiser would create an entity based on the type field for example. Am I thinking something totally wrong? Stef

3 4

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #159: 20430-Move-kernel-tests-that-use-compiler-to-a-standalone-package
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 27, 2017

Sept. 27, 2017

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #159 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #289 was integrated: "20430-Move-kernel-tests-that-use-compiler-to-a-standalone-package" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/289 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20430 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #158: 19142-Update-Slots-class-comments-ie-AbstractLayout
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 26, 2017

Sept. 26, 2017

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #158 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #316 was integrated: "19142-Update-Slots-class-comments-ie-AbstractLayout" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/316 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19142 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0