- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Esteban's ChangeLog week of 4 June 2018
by estebanlm＠gmail.com June 11, 2018

June 11, 2018

Hello! This is my weekly ChangeLog, from 4 June 2018 to 10 June 2018. You can see it in a better format by going here: http://log.smallworks.eu/web/search?from=4/6/2018&to=10/6/2018 ChangeLog ========= 8 June 2018: ------------ * Well... I spent last two days making work this PR: [https://github.com/Metacello/metacello/pull/490](https://github.com/Metacel… The title of this is "allow filetree alternate formats". What that means? By this PR, the +filetree://+ selector becomes a "generic" selector, capable of decide which kind of file format we are using. This formats are for now cypress (what you usually know as "filetree") and tonel, but we could add others in the future. I'm waiting for integration to also submit a PR to update P7. 5 June 2018: ------------ * In Pharo, we are replacing usages of #asIcon with #iconNamed: so I prepared iceberg to this. You can check the PR here: [https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg/pull/834](https://github.com/pharo-vcs… * Ok, last week I announced [Tonel](https://github.com/pharo-vcs/tonel) was now capable of write Stateful Traits. Yes, that was true... but it was working just for writing, not for reading. Reading needed a bit more work, which you can now found in this commit: [https://github.com/pharo-vcs/tonel/commit/166fd130e93d814e69c9d938429c89083… * To make Tonel read properly stateful traits, there was a missing method on Monticello (yep, there). So I added [case: 22065](https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22065) and there is a PR to solve it: [https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1485](https://github.com/pharo-…. * Found a bug on OSWindow-SDL2 and fixed it. You can check it at [case: 22063](https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22063) and PR [https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1483](https://github.com/pharo-… cheers! Esteban

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1036: 22060-Improve-KMMetaModifier-logic-to-match-events
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1036 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1503 was integrated: "22060-Improve-KMMetaModifier-logic-to-match-events" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1503 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22060 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1035: 22110 Categorize and comment Job Manifest
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1035 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1516 was integrated: "22110 Categorize and comment Job Manifest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1516 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22110 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1034: 22097-InlineMethodRefactoring-internal-
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1034 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1512 was integrated: "22097-InlineMethodRefactoring-internal-" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1512 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22097 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1033: 21949 not possible to save settings
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1033 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1439 was integrated: "21949 not possible to save settings" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1439 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21949 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Annoying frame around ToolDockingBarMorph
by Hilaire June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

Hi, Something changed recently in P7 in the theme or so, there is now a frame around the ToolDockingBarMorph. As I don't know how to track the changes occurring in P7, any one has an idea about what happen? (we do not have anymore timestamp on method, or do I miss something? DrGeo GUI is odd, see screenshot? Hilaire -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu

4 10

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1032: 16319-literals-and-hasLiteral-are-not-in-sync
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 9, 2018

June 9, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1032 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1502 was integrated: "16319-literals-and-hasLiteral-are-not-in-sync" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1502 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16319 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1031: 22106-Renraku-critique-should-have-a-minimal-printOn
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 9, 2018

June 9, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1031 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1513 was integrated: "22106-Renraku-critique-should-have-a-minimal-printOn" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1513 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22106 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Web Frameworks and "Modern" Features
by Sean P. DeNigris June 9, 2018

June 9, 2018

Hernan related running into the following limitations with Pharo web frameworks. I wonder if these are all still missing or if any are now availableâ¦ > None of them was easily adapted to the emerging web trends for the last > years like the > appearance of static site generators, adaptive/responsive design, multiple > competing JS > libraries, semantic web, mobility, etc. not to mention they lack > "standard" built-in features > such as caching, template, security frameworks. "adaptive/responsive design" in particular seems like a pretty big limitation given current expectationsâ¦ ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

2 2

ApplicationSecurity Questions
by Sean P. DeNigris June 9, 2018

June 9, 2018

I'm very excited about this library. I always wished for an off the shelf web app security solution! Not sure if this is the right ML, but since the library was announced hereâ¦ 1. I read that the project was ported to GH. While there is a baseline there, there is also a configuration on GH, but (the weird part) - it still points to StHub instead of loading the baseline from GH 2. How does one actually use the library in practice e.g. for a web app with protected content? The 3 blog posts cover adding a user, but I don't understand how to tie AS in with say Seaside. Is there an example project using it or some docs on that? ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

2 6