- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[IMPORTANT] Development branch changed to "Pharo7.0"
by Esteban Lorenzano Dec. 5, 2018

Dec. 5, 2018

Hi, Working on Pharo7.0 release, I finally changed the default branch. âDevelopment" does not exists anymore, now all Pull Requests needs to be done against âPharo7.0â. This will allow us to : - Continue working on Pharo7.0 release - Open a Pharo8.0 branch (hopefully next week) Iâm sorry for the mess I can cause to someones, there should not be a problem for most of you but some may need to update their scripts. Cheers! Esteban

1 1

[Pharo .0] Build #17: SUCCESS
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Dec. 5, 2018

Dec. 5, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #17 was: SUCCESS. Could not extract further issue information from commit message: restore uploads Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo .0] Build #16: SUCCESS
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Dec. 5, 2018

Dec. 5, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #16 was: SUCCESS. Could not extract further issue information from commit message: dix sources when converting to 64bit too Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1436: Improving comment of class DebugSession
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Dec. 5, 2018

Dec. 5, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1436 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #2040 was integrated: "Improving comment of class DebugSession" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/2040 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/development Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo .0] Build #15: FAILURE
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Dec. 5, 2018

Dec. 5, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #15 was: FAILURE. Could not extract further issue information from commit message: fix inclusion of sources suspend upload for the moment = Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo .0] Build #14: SUCCESS
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Dec. 4, 2018

Dec. 4, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #14 was: SUCCESS. Could not extract further issue information from commit message: groovy is zero based :( Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1435: 22727-NonInteractiveTranscript-is-broken-with-files
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Dec. 4, 2018

Dec. 4, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1435 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #2039 was integrated: "22727-NonInteractiveTranscript-is-broken-with-files" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/2039 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22727 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

InterruptedContext vs suspendedContext
by Thomas Dupriez Dec. 4, 2018

Dec. 4, 2018

Hello, Instances of DebugSession have an "interruptedContext" and an "interruptedProcess" instance variable. Instances of Process have a "suspendedContext" instance variable. Does someone know if there is a relation between the interruptedContext of a DebugSession and the suspendedContext of its interruptedProcess? At first glance it seems like these two variables are redundant and store the same Context. Thomas Dupriez

3 3

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1434: 22687-Update-Tonel
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Dec. 3, 2018

Dec. 3, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1434 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #2028 was integrated: "22687-Update-Tonel" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/2028 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22687 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Migrate PetitParser (1) on GitHub under moosetechnology organisation?
by Julien Dec. 3, 2018

Dec. 3, 2018

Hello, Iâd like to migrate PetitParser (1) on GitHub under moosetechnology organisation. I have a project depending on it and there are some stuff Iâd like to fix on PetitParser 1 ConfigurationOf (which will become a baseline on GitHub). Is it ok to migrate it? Cheers, Julien --- Julien Delplanque Doctorant Ã lâUniversitÃ© de Lille http://juliendelplanque.be/phd.html Equipe Rmod, Inria BÃ¢timent B 40, Avenue Halley 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq NumÃ©ro de tÃ©lÃ©phone: +333 59 35 86 40

2 3