- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Double line feeds in some method source
by Schwab,Wilhelm K April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

Hello all, I built an image from the 1.0 image (congratulations/thanks to all!!!!) and have noticed that some of the method source has extra line feeds. So far, I have not noticed anything that the affected classes/methods/packages/etc. have in common. Anyone else seeing this? Bill

4 7

[Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo 1.0 released!
by Adrian Lienhard April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

Hi all, I'm excited to announce our first official release! Please check out the updated website at www.pharo-project.org. Specific information about what this release provides can be found on www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-1-0 Please help us spread the word! I've written a blog post that can be linked: http://www.pharo-project.org/news?article=pharo-news-3-pharo-1-0-released Cheers, Adrian ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/

11 11

[Pharo-project] we need help for rome
by Torsten Bergmann April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

After copying - "RomePlugin.dll" - "libcairo-2.dll", - "libfontconfig-1.dll" (which I got from an installation from www.opensophie.org) into the windows VM folder (Win VM 3.11.8) and patching #clipRectangle: I was able to see the red car moving. Smalltalk listLoadedModules gave me in 1.1. core: #('Matrix2x3Plugin 10 March 2010 (i)' 'FloatArrayPlugin 10 March 2010 (i)' 'ZipPlugin 10 March 2010 (i)' 'SocketPlugin 10 March 2010 (i)' 'LargeIntegers v1.5 10 March 2010 (i)' 'LocalePlugin 10 March 2010 (i)' 'B2DPlugin 10 March 2010 (i)' 'BitBltPlugin 10 March 2010 (i)' 'SecurityPlugin 10 March 2010 (i)' 'FilePlugin 10 March 2010 (i)' 'MiscPrimitivePlugin 10 March 2010 (i)') Maybe you miss the cairo and font config stuff. You can try to abuse a Sophie installation to see if it runs/whats required. Bye T. -- GRATIS fÃ¼r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

2 1

[Pharo-project] Wish List for Tests
by Torsten Bergmann April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

Lukas wrote: >It is ugly if tests leave garbage, but this is not really a problem >for a continuous integration system. At least my setup always starts >builds at a clean place. I know that it is not a problem for rerunning. I mean the CI-System should check that nothing is left after running all the tests (maybe by using a test that is run as last test). >SmallLint checks that. In PharoCore there are over 30000 lint issues. >It is a lot of work to clean that all up. Several people already went >through some of the most important rules and fixed them. Method categories are good ... I totally miss them in Java, C#, ... Currently we try to cleaning them up afterwards which is a lot of work. Maybe we find a way to enforce them as early as possible: - upon method creation menu item "create method" with a method template in the browser and an initial dialog to ask for the category - or checking before saving/uploading in Monticello Stef wrote: >4. We should have a consistent naming of Test-Package I dislike this and I already mentioned that I would rather follow a better scheme (the one from Seaside) Class categories/packages are tyically sorted alphabetically in the browser and other tools like Monticello. So the code and the tests are not together in the tools with this scheme. And yes, real packages would be a plus ;) >open bug entry done, see issue #2319 Adrian wrote: >If you run this in a Pharo image, it also does not leave any dirty >packages, but obviously it does not remove the tests from external >packages. To achieve this, the maintainers of external packages would need >to separate the tests from the rest of their code. I know ... when people see pharo they typically see "pharo-dev" instead of "pharo-core". We want to shrink the core and grow the dev image - both with the same quality. Question left is how we can influence better quality for included external packages too... Bye T.

2 1

[Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo 1.0 - Win32 Installer
by Torsten Bergmann April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

There is a new Win32 Installer, now for the final 1.0 release. The Windows specific installer is a 10MB download compared to the 30MB "one click ZIP image for all platforms". The Setup installs Pharo on your windows machine including start menu registration, etc. As ever it's available from the general download page [1] or directly via [2]. Compared to the one click image (which uses the 3.11.8 Win32-VM) the new installer includes the latest 4.0.2 Win32 VM which is now usable with Pharo 1.0 by setting "EnableAltF4Quit = 1" in the Pharo.ini (see [3] for the discussion) The download page was also updated to link to the 4.0.2. VM. Bye T. [1] http://pharo-project.org/pharo-download [2] https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/26835/setup_pharo1.0-10517-release… [3] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-April/025191.html -- GRATIS fÃ¼r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

1 0

[Pharo-project] Optimization of PharoCore File Downloads
by Lukas Renggli April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

When I need a new Pharo image I typically go to the files listing at https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/?group_id=1299 where I find all the core images for Pharo 1.0 and 1.1. The problem is that it is really time consuming to find the right section on this large page :-) - Would it be possible to reorder the sections "Pharo-Core 1.0" and "Pharo-Core 1.1" to appear on top? - Or, put an index of all sections on top of that page? - Or, use some unambiguous spelling for the section titles (like "[PharoCore1.0]" and "[PharoCore1.1]") so that the sections can be quickly found using Ctrl+F without getting matches in the filenames? Just a few ideas to make this a bit easier. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch

3 6

[Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] [ANN] Pharo 1.0 released!
by Torsten Bergmann April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote: >Now I feel more spurred to get my act together and contribute something >myself, especially since I just downloaded and ran the 1-click image and >found to my horror that the Test Runner is showing some red :-/ This is just when you run all tests in the TestRunner in one step. When you run them alone they are green. Also RenderBugz fails from time to time. Maybe we should raise the time in RenderBugz>>long Bye T. -- GRATIS fÃ¼r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

2 1

[Pharo-project] more evidence that I am a newbie
by Lawson English April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

I tried to load Andreas Raab's ffi-based OpenGL packages into Pharo 1.0... (Installer repository: 'http://source.squeak.org/FFI') install: 'FFI-Pools'; install: 'FFI-Kernel'; install: 'FFI-Tests'. (Installer repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/CroquetGL') install: '3DTransform'; install: 'OpenGL-Pools'; install: 'OpenGL-Core'. OpenGL example I wasn't quite sure how to load them with Gofer so I did it manually with Monticello. However, when I "doIt" with 'OpenGL example' I get the error: MessageNotUnderstood: SystemDictionary>>platformName OpenGL class>>new OpenGL class>>newIn: OpenGL example No doubt its something totally trivial... Suggestions? Lawson

4 13

[Pharo-project] Fwd: Re: Handle Close Event in Image - necessary for 1.0?
by Torsten Bergmann April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

Cool, this would also allow us to use newer VM's with "old" 1.0 pharo images. >The in-image close-event that is now generated by default in the Windows >VM has always been a settable entity. In your original announcements you wrote that the old behavior can be influenced by using SHIFT (see [1]), so I did'nt notice that one can also get the old behavior back using the .ini file. Thanks for your post. Next time I will crosspost to vm-dev. Bye Torsten [1] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2010-March/004142.html -- GRATIS fÃ¼r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: iPhone OS 4 SDK, section 3.3.1
by Igor Stasenko April 16, 2010

April 16, 2010

On 15 April 2010 22:13, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi andreas > > I think that indeed this is the only possible reaction to Apple stupidity (I'm using a mac since 92 and I feel sick). > ouch.. Luckily, i never used macs. I have been considering to buy a macbook lately, but now, i'd rather buy something else. I letting Apple to live and die w/o me :) > Stef > > On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Andreas Raab wrote: > >> On 4/15/2010 11:50 AM, Juan Vuletich wrote: >>> Andreas Raab wrote: >>>> On 4/8/2010 2:43 PM, Sean Malloy wrote: >>>>> Anyone have any thoughts on this change to the agreement? >>>> >>>> Just in case anyone had any illusions on this: >>>> >>>> http://computinged.wordpress.com/2010/04/15/apple-removes-scratch-from-ipad… >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> - Andreas >>> >>> Oh! How silly then can be! >> >> Indeed. Well, I'm looking forward to a nice Android tablet. >> BTW, we can use some help and you won't even have to sign an NDA: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/squeak-android-vm/ >> >> Cheers, >> Â - Andreas >> > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

1 0