- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] http://www.squeaksource.com/ is down
by Mariano Martinez Peck June 21, 2010

June 21, 2010

Cheers Mariano

3 2

[Pharo-project] Squeak on iPad (2)
by Torsten Bergmann June 21, 2010

June 21, 2010

More here: http://croquetweak.blogspot.com/2010/06/squeak-etoys-on-ipad.html "Morphic was designed to handle multiple "hands" (pointing devices) from the beginning" I hope we didnt remove that while cleaning morphic, so Pharo could also be made multitouch-aware. Bye T. -- GMX DSL: Internet-, Telefon- und Handy-Flat ab 19,99 EUR/mtl. Bis zu 150 EUR Startguthaben inklusive! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

4 5

[Pharo-project] OBSystemBrowser and class comments
by Torsten Bergmann June 21, 2010

June 21, 2010

Maybe the code pane still updates Shout/eCompletion like in "method/class definition editing mode" while in "edit class comment mode". Bye T. -- GMX DSL: Internet-, Telefon- und Handy-Flat ab 19,99 EUR/mtl. Bis zu 150 EUR Startguthaben inklusive! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

4 5

Re: [Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Writing extensions
by Mariano Martinez Peck June 21, 2010

June 21, 2010

Hi Bob and welcome. There are two possibiities I know to write/communicate to C: - The FFI plugin is intended to call external libraries from Smalltalk http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/1414 http://forum.world.st/FFI-Documentation-td2225148.html#a2225148 - Write your own VM primitives http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/356 http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3336 http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6102 Probably there are much more links, but maybe this is enough to remember you what you used. Let us know Mariano On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Bob Cowdery <bob(a)bobcowdery.plus.com>wrote: > Hi all, > > I played with Squeak about 4 years ago and I built some extensions in C. > I would like to do the same again with Pharo and I have a big lump of C > I would like to interface to. I can't actually remember what I did > before and can't seem to find the tutorial I used. Could somebody point > me in the right direction please. > > Thanks > Bob > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-users mailing list > Pharo-users(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users >

1 0

[Pharo-project] OBSystemBrowser and class comments
by Adrien BARREAU June 21, 2010

June 21, 2010

Hello all, I'm writing some class comment for Citezen. But I think something is strange: when I type something on my keyboard, there are 1 or 2 secondes of latent period before it display it on the screen. I don't know if it has already been signaled. Adrien. _________________________________________________________________ Installez gratuitement les nouvelles Emoch'ticones ! http://www.ilovemessenger.fr/emoticones/telecharger-emoticones-emochticones…

3 2

[Pharo-project] SLICE-Issue-2576-AddingAutoFitToNewTextMorph
by Fernando olivero June 20, 2010

June 20, 2010

SLICE-Issue-2576-AddingAutoFitToNewTextMorph-FernandoOlivero.2 Fix in PharoInbox. (Needs SLICE-Issue-2557-NewTextMorphRefactorings-FernandoOlivero, loaded in in 12010 ) Fernando

1 0

[Pharo-project] Interesting survey about smalltalk
by Igor Stasenko June 20, 2010

June 20, 2010

http://therighttool.hammerprinciple.com/items/smalltalk I think this could be used as a good guide for us to make an effort to move some low-ranked items into a high ranked ones :) -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

1 0

[Pharo-project] Fwd: Issue 2551 in pharo: Performance degradation of WeakRegistry in Pharo 1.1
by StÃ©phane Ducasse June 19, 2010

June 19, 2010

Begin forwarded message: > From: Joachim Geidel <joachim.geidel(a)onlinehome.de> > Date: June 19, 2010 5:29:56 PM GMT+02:00 > To: StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > Subject: Re: Issue 2551 in pharo: Performance degradation of WeakRegistry in Pharo 1.1 > > Hello Stef, > > I just saw that you have integrated Collections-ul.362 to fix the > performance problem with WeakRegistry finalization. > > For Squeak, I had also reported a deadlock > (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7546) In a discussion with Levente > Uzonyi on the Squeak-dev list, we found that this was because > WeakKeyDictionary executes the finalizers for gc'd elements in the scope of > the protected block in WeakRegistry>>finalizeValues. As the WeakRegistry has > no control over what the finalizers do, this is a potential source for > deadlocks. This actually happens in JNIPort. The problem was introduced in > Squeak 4.1. > > Levente has fixed the problem in Collections-ul.365.mcz. He has not yet > closed the Squeak issue 7546 yet; I have sent him a reminder. I think it > would be better to integrate Collections-ul.365.mcz. Otherwise there will be > deadlocks in Pharo too, at least with JNIPort. I can work around this, as > JNIPort comes with its own subclass of WeakRegistry, but other users of > WeakRegistry could run into the same problem. OTOH, I don't know what other > changes have been introduced between Collections-ul.362 and > Collections-ul.365, so there may be unwanted changes which are not good for > Pharo. > > Cheers, > Joachim > > ------ Weitergeleitete Nachricht >> Von: "pharo(a)googlecode.com" <pharo(a)googlecode.com> >> Antworten an: "codesite-noreply(a)google.com" <codesite-noreply(a)google.com> >> Datum: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:05:59 +0200 >> An: Joachim Geidel <joachim.geidel(a)bluecarat.de> >> Betreff: ***SPAM*** Re: Issue 2551 in pharo: Performance degradation of >> WeakRegistry in Pharo 1.1 >> > >> Updates: >> Status: Fixed >> >> Comment #6 on issue 2551 by stephane.ducasse: Performance degradation of >> WeakRegistry in Pharo 1.1 >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2551 >> >> (No comment was entered for this change.) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you starred the issue. >> You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: >> https://code.google.com/hosting/settings > > ------ Ende der weitergeleiteten Nachricht > >

1 0

June 19, 2010

12010 ----- - Issue 2556: AutoStart - Issue 2557: NewTextMorph and CodeMorphs refactorings and tests Fernando apparently one of your test is breaking. can you check? Stef

1 0

June 19, 2010

1 0