- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 2736 in pharo: Add checker for overlapping package
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 25, 2010

Nov. 25, 2010

Updates: Cc: stephane.ducasse Comment #3 on issue 2736 by marcus.denker: Add checker for overlapping package http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2736 Issue 3009 has been merged into this issue.

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3009 in pharo: Add the overlapping package checker in ScriptLoader
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 25, 2010

Nov. 25, 2010

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2736 Comment #3 on issue 3009 by marcus.denker: Add the overlapping package checker in ScriptLoader http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3009 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3245 in pharo: Cannot browse implementors
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 25, 2010

Nov. 25, 2010

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #1 on issue 3245 by marcus.denker: Cannot browse implementors http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3245 that is because it's testExtMethodModified? (-ied)

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3248 in pharo: Bad error message for non existing changes file.
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 25, 2010

Nov. 25, 2010

Updates: Status: Started Labels: -Milestone-1.2 Comment #6 on issue 3248 by marcus.denker: Bad error message for non existing changes file. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3248 Can not find a fix. --> Status Started Not a showstopper --> remove Milestone 1.2

1 1

[Pharo-project] TODO list for 1.2...
by Marcus Denker Nov. 25, 2010

Nov. 25, 2010

http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?cursor=3248&q=milestone%3D1.2 ... a bug tracker especially lives from doing small steps. - Is the code attached in a form that it can be loaded directly? If not --> create that. .cs or Slice. -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3189 in pharo: Changes not working since update 12220
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 25, 2010

Nov. 25, 2010

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #2 on issue 3189 by marcus.denker: Changes not working since update 12220 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3189 can not reproduce

1 0

[Pharo-project] [ANN] Exif
by Alexander LazareviÄ Nov. 25, 2010

Nov. 25, 2010

Hi! I just uploaded a first hack of an Exif package to squeaksource. http://www.squeaksource.com/Exif.html MIT License. Any contributions are welcome (see current limitations). Haven't tested it on Pharo yet. But there shouldn't be anything special about it. Have fun, Alex >From the project description: This provides code to extract/modify the Exif (Exchangeable image file format) information from/inside media files. - Current limitations: - Works only for TIFF-, JPEG-files - Can't write Exif information - Can't read/write GPS information - Can't read/write Interoperability information - Can't read/write any vendor specific MakerNote - Can't read/write UserComments - Most methods for cooked information (like dateTime) are missing - Examples: "Dump all Exif information from a JPEG-file to the Transcript" Transcript show: (Exif readFromJPEGNamed: 'p2.jpg') printAll; cr. "Get *raw* Exif content for DateTime (a String)" (Exif readFromJPEGNamed: 'p2.jpg') atTagName: #DateTime. "#('2010:11:10 16:56:33')" "Get *cooked* Exif content for DateTime (a DateAndTime object)" (Exif readFromJPEGNamed: 'p2.jpg') dateTime. "2010-11-10T16:56:33+01:00" - Specs: Exif and TIFF <http://www.exif.org/specifications.html> - Disclaimer: This software is provided as is. It is in a very early stage and there are no guaranties that the software will work as expected or advertised. Be sure to use only image files with this software that you have backed up before. I refuse any responsibility for any data lost while using this software.

2 2

Nov. 25, 2010

Hi cyrille On Nov 25, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > Hello > > I am currently writing some tests about all that and some questions comed in mind :) > > => If I create a category named: 'Category' from the classic browser, it does not create a package in the monticello browser. > Is that behavior something clearly wanted or is it just resulting from something I don't know ? for now there is no direct mapping from category to package. We have to declare a package with the category name and it will match the subcategories. > => I define a class in this category, still nothing in the monticello browser > > => I defined in any class a category named: '*cAtEGorY', still nothing. because it is empty? > => If I define a method in this category, monticello browser display the package and merge the extension and the existing category. But the name of the monticello package generated is: 'CAtEGorY. Should'nt it have the name of the smalltalk category instead ? Even if no package are defined. this is strange I would have thought that we would not get anything if the package is not defined. > > Then about extensions, what are the rule applied to consider a class category as an extension. > I guess there is > => no distinctions about the case of the name (*cAteGory should be consider as an extension of Category) indeed > => if the name of the class category match with the beginning of an existing package ('*CategorySubCategory should be consider as an extension of Category ?? ) > Is there something more ? pay attention that you can have multiple package starting with the same name. Stef

1 0

[Pharo-project] Question about MethodContext, tempNames and GC
by Mariano Martinez Peck Nov. 25, 2010

Nov. 25, 2010

Hi. These days, I needed to implement a loop detector for one of my projects, and I started to play a lit with thisContext. I've used it before but not as deep as now. It is AWESOME!!!! Now...I noticed (and I think this was the most awesome thing) that I can not only access to senders and their receivers and methods, but also to the arguments!!! And then I thought... mmmmmm how can I access the arguments of a sender of a sender of .... because I thought they should be garbage collected, but if I can access. Ok, there is when I discover that this information is stored in a DebuggerMethodMap and I guess this guy uses a kind of WeakArray to store them. Now, for my loop detector, I use thisContext to access senders AND I need to access the arguments of a method of a sender. For that I use the method ContextPart >> tempsAndValues The question is....isn't this method quite "fragile"? I mean, doesn't this work ONLY if a GC was not run between thisContext and that context ? I am right ? I need to know this to see if I can trust on this or not. And if I am right, maybe we can modify and add this info in a comment? Thanks Mariano

2 1

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3256 in pharo: matchesRegex on colon
by pharo＠googlecode.com Nov. 25, 2010

Nov. 25, 2010

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #2 on issue 3256 by marcus.denker: matchesRegex on colon http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3256 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 0