- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Telnet client
by Mariano Martinez Peck Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

Hi Aidan, I have no idea, but I cc'ed pharo-dev mailing list just in case someone can help mariano On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Aidan Gauland <aidalgol(a)no8wireless.co.nz>wrote: > Hi, > > I want to create a MUD <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUD> client (a > client for games played over Telnet) with Pharo, but I'm stuck on how > best to use Pharo as a Telnet client. I've heard of the cURL plugin, > but I'm not sure if that can be (easily) used for anything other than > file transfers. Even if I built and installed it, I'm not confident > I'd be able to tell for certain whether I can use it in the way I > want. I also found this > <http://map.squeak.org/package/14bcecc6-dbb8-4866-bb0c-25278ca882ba>, > but that's about eight years old and its homepage link is dead, so it > doesn't look too promising. I found TelnetProtocolClient in the Pharo > image, but that does not seem to be at all what I need. > > Can someone with experience with telnetting from within Pharo/Squeak > point me in the right direction? > > Thanks, > Aidan > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAk0hlP4ACgkQjyzTRvYJmaV/3QCePcuRL3E1EX1OYjT6nVGSjnyl > VoQAoIF507GVLtaWENeKTOYbhSWGqrmh > =JWyt > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >

1 0

[Pharo-project] Issue 3414 in pharo: CompilerEvaluationTest>>#testEvaluationOfSelfSend fails
by pharo＠googlecode.com Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

Status: Accepted Owner: marcus.denker Labels: Milestone-1.2 New issue 3414 by marcus.denker: CompilerEvaluationTest>>#testEvaluationOfSelfSend fails http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3414 CompilerEvaluationTest>>#testEvaluationOfSelfSend fails

1 9

[Pharo-project] next steps for pharo
by Torsten Bergmann Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

I think we can could/should not really force people to it but at least work on this and add support for cleaning. For instance blocking the Monticello upload in 1.3 if a package does not follow certain criterias would not be a good idea! We want to continue accepting solutions even if they are not 100% (since the definition of 100% sometimes depends on the POV and we may end up with code Bureaucracy and maybe less developers). Pharo should continue to be fun but we want more discipline. IMHO we should: 1. do it step by step by more repacking and documenting (see the already repackaged announcements and regex, Sunit will follow with issue 3445) => we need cleaned exemplary packages so people are able to follow the patterns 2. Define lint checks and make them instantly available via browser tools. Maybe you know the VisualWorks browser where you have the checks in a tab beside the code pane where one could instantly check and see problems in code. Eclipse has that too with Checkstyle/"the Problem view". I would like to see that in standard browser. 3. Define minimum criterias a core/dev package must have to be part of the system (unloadable, cleaned up dependency, class comments, have tests, ...) 4. Give a visual feedback (icon) if the package is not "clean", so people get a bad feeling when they see this on their packages and work towards cleaning. We can also have a package ranking ("the most clean" or "package of the month", ... ;) Just $0.02 Bye T. -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

2 1

[Pharo-project] next steps for pharo.
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

Hi guys I'm brainstorming on what should be our next important actions. My gut feeling is that I would love - to get more class comments and documentation. - get a list of working packages for development expanding the list of packages available from: http://book.pharo-project.org/book/PharoTools - get metacello repositories up and running and start to get certified packages. How can we all make sure that this happens? Stef

2 2

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12292
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

12292 ----- - Issue 3414: CompilerEvaluationTest>>#testEvaluationOfSelfSend fails. Thanks Igor :) - Issue 3503: LongMessageDialogWindow should be resizeable. Thanks Alain Plantec Stef

1 0

[Pharo-project] fixing deprecation process once for all
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

I took 5 min and wrote down that http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/DeprecationProcess comment if you want.

2 2

[Pharo-project] Issue 3503 in pharo: LongMessageDialogWindow should be resizeable
by pharo＠googlecode.com Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

Status: Accepted Owner: aplantec Labels: Milestone-1.3 New issue 3503 by aplantec: LongMessageDialogWindow should be resizeable http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3503 Really more confortable for system/about message or the about message of a SystemWindow as examples.

1 2

[Pharo-project] alternative source for rfb server?
by sergio_101 Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

it looks like http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/ has been around for awhile.. i think this is causing my problems in trying to find an RFB server.. does anyone have any ideas how i might get a working RFB server? thanks! -- ---- peace, sergio photographer, journalist, visionary http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com http://www.CodingForHire.com http://www.coffee-black.com http://www.painlessfrugality.com http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 http://www.facebook.com/sergio101

2 1

Re: [Pharo-project] new Cog VMs
by mkobetic＠gmail.com Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

"Eliot Miranda"<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote: > so find new VMs in > VM.r2341/<http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2341/>. Yup, much better on my end. Thanks! Martin

1 0

Jan. 2, 2011

12291 ----- - Issue 3502: DNU while parsing. Thanks Alain Plantec. - Issue 3224: Migrating MethodReference to MethodReferenceWithSource. Part one. Thanks Benjamin van Ryseghem Stef

1 0