- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Difference between Pharo 2.0 from webpage and from zeroconf
by Juraj Kubelka Nov. 15, 2013

Nov. 15, 2013

Hi! Do you know what is the difference between Pharo 2.0 downloaded from http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download and from http://get.pharo.org/20 I supposed I will obtain the same images. But the Zeroconf one is apparently different. Is there an zeroconf which offers the 2.0 image which is available on pharo-project.org? Thanks. Cheers, Jura

1 1

Latest Xcode to Compile VM
by Sean P. DeNigris Nov. 15, 2013

Nov. 15, 2013

What's the latest Xcode version successfully used to compile the Pharo VM? I don't want to upgrade past the maintainers... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Latest-Xcode-to-Compile-VM-tp4719249.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 5

Commit permissions to Pharo30Inbox
by Juraj Kubelka Nov. 15, 2013

Nov. 15, 2013

Hi, can someone give me a commit permissions to Pharo30Inbox? My account is http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~JurajKubelka Thank you, Jura

3 5

how-to-contribute points to null
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Nov. 15, 2013

Nov. 15, 2013

http://www.pharo-project.org/community/how-to-contribute point to https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?W39 which does not exist Stef

2 2

[Bug] In ClassDescription>>#linesOfCode
by Roberto Minelli Nov. 15, 2013

Nov. 15, 2013

Hi, I looked at the implementation of #linesOfCode of ClassDescription. It is actually wrong, a correct version should be: linesOfCode "An approximate measure of lines of code. Includes comments, but excludes blank lines." | lines | lines := self localMethods inject: 0 into: [:sum :each | sum + each linesOfCode]. ^ self isMeta not ifTrue: [lines] ifFalse: [lines + self class linesOfCode] Cheers, Roby

2 3

A thought about backporting
by Noury Bouraqadi Nov. 15, 2013

Nov. 15, 2013

Hi, Here is a thought I want to share with you. Please don't misunderstand me. I'm really valuing the effort that people put into pharo, but I think sharing this will hopefully result in improving our system. I believe that back-porting is a false good idea. Consider simply this question: what is the 2.0 release? The latest version or the one release this summer? There are valuable bugfixes and enhancements that were integrated in the latest 2.0. But, I believe that this may cause some frustration among users since the API/features might evolve a bit (it happened to me, and it seems that I'm not the only one). Rather than changing 2.0, I suggest to introduce 2.1 if the community really believes that 2.0 isn't good enough. Same for future versions. Once we are confident enough with a RC, we should freeze it. Only critical bugfixes should be backported in yet another minor version. Noury Ecole des Mines de Douai http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury --

8 9

[pharo-project/pharo-core] 1afd20: 30576
by GitHub Nov. 15, 2013

Nov. 15, 2013

Branch: refs/heads/3.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 1afd20cec16208a17b633da307127a0f62d1748a https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/1afd20cec16208a17b633da3… Author: Jenkins Build Server <board(a)pharo-project.org> Date: 2013-11-15 (Fri, 15 Nov 2013) Changed paths: M Kernel.package/Number.class/class/instance creation/readFrom_ifFail_.st A ScriptLoader30.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - scripts/script232.st A ScriptLoader30.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/pharo - updates/update30576.st M ScriptLoader30.package/ScriptLoader.class/instance/public/commentForCurrentUpdate.st M Tests.package/ReleaseTest.class/instance/testing/testObsoleteBehaviors.st M Tests.package/ReleaseTest.class/instance/testing/testUnknownProcesses.st Log Message: ----------- 30576 12172 relax #testUnknownProcesses a little https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12172 12171 Fix last reference to ExtendedNumberParser https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12171 12165 #testObsoleteBehaviors failing after running native boost tests https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12165 http://files.pharo.org/image/30/30576.zip

1 0

[pharo-project/pharo-core]
by GitHub Nov. 15, 2013

Nov. 15, 2013

Branch: refs/tags/30576 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

1 0

Jenkins build became unstable: Pharo-2.0-Tests Â» run 1,vm,linux #278
by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr Nov. 15, 2013

Nov. 15, 2013

See <https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/Run=run%201,VM=vm,label=linux…>

1 1

Nov. 15, 2013

Hi guys we have now 183 contributors or past contributors that signed the license. Please do not forget to sign yours: http://files.pharo.org/media/PharoSoftwareDistributionAgreement.pdf Stef

1 0