June 2020 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo 9.0] Build #419: Nilled weak reference was found in a dictionary
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 25, 2020

June 25, 2020

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #419 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6678 was integrated: "Nilled weak reference was found in a dictionary" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6678 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/6677 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 9.0] Build #418: 6532-Incomplete-state-of-method-AST
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 25, 2020

June 25, 2020

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #418 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6669 was integrated: "6532-Incomplete-state-of-method-AST" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6669 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/6532 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 9.0] Build #417: Introduce Collections-Stack-Tests
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 25, 2020

June 25, 2020

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #417 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6676 was integrated: "Introduce Collections-Stack-Tests" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6676 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/6675 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Completion Setting Split-Up
by Sean P. DeNigris June 25, 2020

June 25, 2020

Why has NECPreferences `#spaceAfterCompletion` been moved to NECEntry in Pharo 9? Usability seems a bit worse because the user now has to know about two objects to configure it. Also, it was originally held in a class-side instVar, which made it seem like different NECEntry subclasses might have different behavior and might justify the move, but it is now a class var, shared by all, and so the behavior seems the same... ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

2 1

looking for project using Voyage in order to test a redis Driver implementation
by ClÃ©ment Dutriez June 25, 2020

June 25, 2020

Hello, I'm interning for telna (today -> August 2020) , I'm working on implementation of a voyage redis driver. I have finished the first iteration, all voyage-kernel tests are green, so functionally it's work. but in production, I think it will fail. So I'm looking for projects using voyage to test my implementation. if you have advice, qualities criteria, in order to improve my implementation please let me know. RoadMap: 1- [ ] add documentations - [ ] implementation documentation - [ ] documentation in the project (class description ...) 2- [ ] test on other projects I will send another mail with documentation in a few days. Thank you ! -- Dutriez ClÃ©ment

1 0

[Pharo 9.0] Build #416: Object centric installer reflective view on objects
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 25, 2020

June 25, 2020

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #416 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6673 was integrated: "Object centric installer reflective view on objects" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6673 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/Object Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 9.0] Build #415: use-OCBytecodeToASTCache-instead-of-fullBlockInstructionForPC
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 25, 2020

June 25, 2020

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #415 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #6632 was integrated: "use-OCBytecodeToASTCache-instead-of-fullBlockInstructionForPC" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6632 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/use Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Trait Change in Pharo 9?
by Sean P. DeNigris June 24, 2020

June 24, 2020

In Pharo 9, the following fails to load: Metacello new baseline: 'Magritte'; repository: 'github://seandenigris/Magritte'; load: 'Magritte-Bootstrap'. Specifically, this method fails to compile: TMagritteBootstrap >> doesNotUnderstand: aMessage ^ self magritteDescription detect: [ :d | d accessor handlesSelector: aMessage selector ] ifFound: [ :handler | handler handleMessage: aMessage for: self ] ifNone: [ super doesNotUnderstand: aMessage ]. But instead signals that `send: #doesNotUnderstand: toSuperOf: TMagritteBootstrap` is ânot supportedâ. There is a comment which is over my head: âTrait methods are copied to the users and only the last literal is updated. For directed super send the literal of the super send should be updated too.â I feel like this was working previously and would like to understand why itâs not now and how to fix it. ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

1 0

[Pharo 9.0] Build #414: ReservedVariable-usingMethods-isReferenced
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 24, 2020

June 24, 2020

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #414 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #6671 was integrated: "ReservedVariable-usingMethods-isReferenced" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6671 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/ReservedVariable Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 9.0] Build #413: 6663-hasSpecificLayout-should-delegate-with-dispatch-to-layout
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 24, 2020

June 24, 2020

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #413 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #6670 was integrated: "6663-hasSpecificLayout-should-delegate-with-dispatch-to-layout" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/6670 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/6663 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0