September 2018 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Iceberg > review pull request & repo name clash
by Ben Coman Sept. 7, 2018

Sept. 7, 2018

Two concerns from one flow of events... I was trying out "review a pull request" feature for the first time. This looks very promising, but I got stuck. In Pharo 6.1... Downloaded http://files.pharo.org/platform/Pharo6.1-win.zip Updated Icerberg per https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg#update-iceberg Iceberg > Settings > Use custom keys = Enabled > Add > Clone remote repository Remote URL = git@github.com:exercism/pharo.git ==> "pharo" repo appears, status "Not loaded" > "pharo" repo > Packages ==> BaselineOfExercism, Exercism, etc > "pharo" repo > Github > View pull request > origin > enter github account password ==> shows PR#98 "Move setup to class initialization..." > right-click 98 > Review pull request ==> an empty window titled "Browsing pull request: #98...." appeared (see attached) Trying the same in Pharo 7 gave a different problem... >From Launcher started Pharo-7.0.0-alpha.build.1231.sha.cf8aa48.arch.32bit... Iceberg > Settings > Use custom keys = Enabled > "pharo" repo > Forget Repository > Ticked "Also remove repository from file system" > Add > Clone remote repository Remote URL = git@github.com:exercism/pharo.git ==> "pharo" appears, status = "Fetch required. Unknown cf8aa48" > "pharo" repo > Fetch ==> no change in status, but I do see the the expected files in repo on disk > "pharo" repo > Packages ==> only shows LICENSE and README.md. Why did this "just work" in 6.1 ? It seems the source directory is wrong. From this point is it possible to update the source directory to "dev/src/" ? Maybe its due to the name clash "pharo-project/pharo" versus "exercism/pharo" and something was retained after the "Forget Repository". Such a name clash is unfortunate, but is a corner case that should be handled. This could be a useful test case. Before I log an issue, could someone check I'm not doing something wrong. cheers -ben P.S. A work around might have been giving a custom local name for the exercism/pharo repo, much like you can specify the folder created by command line 'git clone'. Is such a feature planned for Iceberg?

2 1

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1236: 22424 Correctly deprecate Ring-Deprecated-Tests-Containers and Ring-Dâ¦
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 7, 2018

Sept. 7, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1236 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1775 was integrated: "22424 Correctly deprecate Ring-Deprecated-Tests-Containers and Ring-Dâ¦" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1775 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22424 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1235: 22426 Cleanup LzwGifEncoder and GIFReadWriter
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 7, 2018

Sept. 7, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1235 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1777 was integrated: "22426 Cleanup LzwGifEncoder and GIFReadWriter" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1777 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22426 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1234: 22420 Cleanup DateAndTimeLeapTest
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 7, 2018

Sept. 7, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1234 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1771 was integrated: "22420 Cleanup DateAndTimeLeapTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1771 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22420 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1233: 22429-Enable-completion-for-the-selector-of-a-method
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 7, 2018

Sept. 7, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1233 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1779 was integrated: "22429-Enable-completion-for-the-selector-of-a-method" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1779 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22429 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Bloc consideration - TextActions
by Ben Coman Sept. 7, 2018

Sept. 7, 2018

This is may not be worth investigating much in Morphic, but tips are welcome. Mainly this is a use case for consideration with the TextAction equivalent in Bloc. For the #text: of a TextEntryDialogWindow I wanted clickable link similar to the bottom of ```WelcomeHelp open``` which would open a link in a web browser using https://github.com/seandenigris/Pharo-Web-Browser. Experimenting in Playground, this[1] looked promising... ``` linkText := 'https://exercism.io/my/settings' asText addAttribute: (TextAction new actOnClickBlock: [ self inform: 'STUB: Invoke web browser here']); addAttribute: (TextColor new color: Color cyan). requestText := 'Enter your Exercism token (from ' asText, linkText, '):'. requestText inspect. ``` where clicking on the link displays the information message. But this[2] didn't work... ```UIManager default request: requestText``` or to be more explicit, diving in a few calls down and simplifying, neither did this... ```(TextEntryDialogWindow new text: requestText) openInWorld``` I tracked it down to [2] having a locked TextMorph for requestText. (observed using the following instrumentation...) TextMorph isLocked (text asString includesSubstring: 'Enter your Exercism token') ifTrue: [ Transcript show: (super isLocked ifTrue: 'x' ifFalse:'.')]. ^ super isLocked and confirmed with this experiment... ``` tm1 := TextMorph new newContents: requestText. tm2 := tm1 copy lock. tm1 openInWorld. "Test clicking the text - action is invoked" tm1 delete. tm2 openInWorld. "Test clicking the text - action not invoked" tm2 delete. ``` This is due to #isLocked call here...: ``` Morph>>rejectsEvent: anEvent "Return true to reject the given event. Rejecting an event means neither the receiver nor any of it's submorphs will be given any chance to handle it. If the event is a mouse wheel event then only reject if the receiver is not visible." (anEvent isMouse and: [anEvent isMouseWheel]) ifTrue: [^self visible not]. ^self isLocked or: [self visible not] ``` Now the functional paradox here is that: * an unlocked TextMorph is editable, which you don't want for a static UI label; * but a locked TextMorph doesn't pass events through to trigger the TextAction. Thus it you can't have a clickable link in a static UI label. Yet that is almost an essential feature in today's "linked" world and I hope Bloc will provide a facility for actions within static/locked text. cheers -ben P.S. Any tips on getting this to work in Pharo 6.1 would be appreciated.

1 1

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1232: 22410-NECWorkspaceController-is-not-used
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 7, 2018

Sept. 7, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1232 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1778 was integrated: "22410-NECWorkspaceController-is-not-used" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1778 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22410 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Status fo Stream changes in Pharo 7
by Torsten Bergmann Sept. 6, 2018

Sept. 6, 2018

Hi, In Pharo 7 there were changes applied to rework the streams. I understand that we might have reasons to change it - but to me this looks incomplete and not finished. For instance "FileStream" is a deprecated class - but still a lot of code in the image is referencing it instead, Is there a guide or plan for all these methods being reworked to use a (hopefully compatible) alternative. Can anyone involved in this topic give an update on the status? Thanks T.

2 1

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1231: 22423 Correctly deprecate MatrixTest
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 6, 2018

Sept. 6, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1231 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1774 was integrated: "22423 Correctly deprecate MatrixTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1774 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22423 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1230: 22421 fogbugz is now manuscript
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 6, 2018

Sept. 6, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1230 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1772 was integrated: "22421 fogbugz is now manuscript" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1772 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22421 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1229: 22419 Complete class comments in Kernel-Tests
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 6, 2018

Sept. 6, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1229 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1770 was integrated: "22419 Complete class comments in Kernel-Tests" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1770 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22419 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1228: 22418 Cleanup DateAndTimeDosEpochTest
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 6, 2018

Sept. 6, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1228 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1768 was integrated: "22418 Cleanup DateAndTimeDosEpochTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1768 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22418 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Why being a Pharo Association Member matters?
by StÃ©phane Ducasse Sept. 6, 2018

Sept. 6, 2018

Hi Pharo supporters First I would like thank you. And I would like to show you that your membership in the Pharo association is really helping Pharo. We are creating a precise report but the main message is the same. You concretely help Pharo. First, we would like to really thank you for your support because as you will see it is important. Your contributions are making an impact. Until now, the association did not make visible how was spent the money from your membership. It's time to fix this. In the first place, the support we got from last year enable the creation of monthly activities helping with the development of Pharo. The association is now the support for the following ones: Sprint organisations: Every month sprints to correct Pharo bugs are organised. You can join remotely or organise one at your location TechTalks: Every month a technical talk is been done to give visibility on Pharo process and Pharo projects and interact with the community to get feedback Next, your association contributions are securing vital Pharo infrastructures. It pays: The domains such as pharo.org. The hosting files.pharo.org: This year we moved out of Inria infrastructure because we could not identify the cause of a huge network latency. It got resolved - it was a fiber which was in bad condition but not cut. This was fixed at the level of Renater national back-bone layer, but we decided to stay outside. We plan to migrate to a better service. The wild apricot software which manages the association. It will enable us to do more with the association. (40$/month) The newsletter via Mailchimp. This newsletter is a real success with more than 2300 recipients . You get see the archive at https://us11.campaign-archive.com/home/?u=6f667565c2569234585a7be77&id=0486… <https://us11.campaign-archive.com/home/?u=6f667565c2569234585a7be77&id=0486…> (30$/month) The mailing-lists are managed with Mailname a professional service. On another note, we would like to remember the advantages of being an association member: Reduction for the PharoDays Offer access to PharoCloud (which is currently under redesign) 20% Discount on the printed book Learning Object-Oriented Programming, Design with TDD in Pharo <http://books.pharo.org/learning-oop/> Possibility to be listed as a Pharo consultant (Require gold membership) -------------------------------------------- StÃ©phane Ducasse http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr http://www.synectique.eu / http://www.pharo.org 03 59 35 87 52 Assistant: Julie Jonas FAX 03 59 57 78 50 TEL 03 59 35 86 16 S. Ducasse - Inria 40, avenue Halley, Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, BÃ¢t.A, Park Plaza Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 France

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1227: 22416 Tag Manifest in Kernel-Tests
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 6, 2018

Sept. 6, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1227 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1767 was integrated: "22416 Tag Manifest in Kernel-Tests" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1767 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22416 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1226: 22412-Typo-closeclosed-in-AbstractBinaryFileStream--nextputAll
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 6, 2018

Sept. 6, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1226 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1765 was integrated: "22412-Typo-closeclosed-in-AbstractBinaryFileStream--nextputAll" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1765 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22412 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1225: 22026-Date-little-improvement-proposal-DateAndTime
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 5, 2018

Sept. 5, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1225 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1747 was integrated: "22026-Date-little-improvement-proposal-DateAndTime" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1747 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22026 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Auto-completion of methods names
by Cyril Ferlicot D. Sept. 5, 2018

Sept. 5, 2018

Hi, Today I tried to launch a Pharo 7 image and I just saw that one of my setting was failing. The setting is from NEC and allow to auto-complete the method name and could be enable like this: NECPreferences overrideModel: true In the recent Pharo 7, #overrideModel: and all the code depending on it was removed. Is there an other way to get this feature or will it just be removed totally from Pharo 7? -- Cyril Ferlicot https://ferlicot.fr

2 2

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1224: 22025-Date-little-improvement-proposal-
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 5, 2018

Sept. 5, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1224 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1755 was integrated: "22025-Date-little-improvement-proposal-" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1755 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22025 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1223: 22409-ProperMethodCategorizationTesttestTearDownMethodInSUnitTestsNeedsToBeInRunningProtocol
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 5, 2018

Sept. 5, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1223 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1764 was integrated: "22409-ProperMethodCategorizationTesttestTearDownMethodInSUnitTestsNeedsToBeInRunningProtocol" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1764 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22409 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1222: 22408-Ecompletion-remove-some-methods-with-no-senders
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 5, 2018

Sept. 5, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1222 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1763 was integrated: "22408-Ecompletion-remove-some-methods-with-no-senders" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1763 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22408 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1221: 22387 Allow dynamic spec builder to specify a different presenter for each model object.
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 4, 2018

Sept. 4, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1221 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1744 was integrated: "22387 Allow dynamic spec builder to specify a different presenter for each model object." Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1744 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22387 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo7] completion: enabled method preview
by Marcus Denker Sept. 4, 2018

Sept. 4, 2018

Hi, In the last build, we enabled by default the method preview in the code completion dialog. (this is left-arrow). In addition, some cleanups should have made opening the menu the first time faster.

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1220: 22401-make-NECContext-pluggable
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 4, 2018

Sept. 4, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1220 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1761 was integrated: "22401-make-NECContext-pluggable" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1761 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22401 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1219: 22391-NECompletion-clean-up-switchToUntyped
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 4, 2018

Sept. 4, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1219 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1758 was integrated: "22391-NECompletion-clean-up-switchToUntyped" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1758 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22391 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1218: 22398-speed-up-NECSymbolCache-interestingSymbolsDo
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 4, 2018

Sept. 4, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1218 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1757 was integrated: "22398-speed-up-NECSymbolCache-interestingSymbolsDo" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1757 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22398 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1217: 22022--Date-little-improvement-proposal--YearcurrentYear
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 3, 2018

Sept. 3, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1217 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1754 was integrated: "22022--Date-little-improvement-proposal--YearcurrentYear" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1754 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22022 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1216: 22239-DataAndTimeTesttestAsDateAndTime-is-meaningful
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 3, 2018

Sept. 3, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1216 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1737 was integrated: "22239-DataAndTimeTesttestAsDateAndTime-is-meaningful" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1737 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22239 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1215: 22364 renraku rule to check that a subclass of test case has its name ending with test
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 2, 2018

Sept. 2, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1215 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1717 was integrated: "22364 renraku rule to check that a subclass of test case has its name ending with test" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1717 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22364 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1214: 22022--Date-little-improvement-proposal--YearcurrentYear
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 2, 2018

Sept. 2, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1214 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1742 was integrated: "22022--Date-little-improvement-proposal--YearcurrentYear" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1742 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22022 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Promote new Pharo 7 VM (d952580)
by Alistair Grant Sept. 2, 2018

Sept. 2, 2018

Hi Esteban and Everyone, I would like to request we start the process for promoting a new Pharo 7 VM. d952580 (vmLatest as I write this) has two changes that I'm looking forward to: - Fix path encoding / decoding on OSX Hopefully this will finally allow me to submit the File Attributes changes (fogbugz 18279[1] & 21368[2]). - Add primitiveChangeMode(), primitiveChangeOwner() and primitiveSymlinkChangeOwner() This will allow Pharo to set file owner & group IDs and posix permissions on Unix platforms (Linux & OSX). Other changes include: - stdio is flagged correctly on Windows - Windows 64 bit work - fflush added to sqFileTruncate() - Eliot's work on Cog - Everything else I've missed :-) (sorry to those authors) Running the automated test suite on Linux 32 bit, Linux 64 bit and Windows 32 bit produces basically the same set of failures with the current stable VM and the proposed VM. [1] https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18279/isSymlink-seems-to-be-broken-on-Lin… [2] https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21368/Integrate-FileAttributesPlugin Thanks, Alistair

2 2

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1213: 22025-Date-little-improvement-proposal-
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 2, 2018

Sept. 2, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1213 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1746 was integrated: "22025-Date-little-improvement-proposal-" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1746 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22025 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1212: 22382-atWrap-and-atWrapput-should-be-better-commented-and-have-an-executable-comment
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 2, 2018

Sept. 2, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1212 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1739 was integrated: "22382-atWrap-and-atWrapput-should-be-better-commented-and-have-an-executable-comment" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1739 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22382 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1211: 22389-remove-NECOverrideModel
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 1, 2018

Sept. 1, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1211 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1749 was integrated: "22389-remove-NECOverrideModel" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1749 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22389 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1210: 21708-Epicea-should-not-offer-to-recover-changes-if-the-ombu-file-does-not-exists
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 1, 2018

Sept. 1, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1210 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1721 was integrated: "21708-Epicea-should-not-offer-to-recover-changes-if-the-ombu-file-does-not-exists" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1721 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21708 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1209: 22392-messages-in-String-need-more-executable-comments
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr Sept. 1, 2018

Sept. 1, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1209 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1752 was integrated: "22392-messages-in-String-need-more-executable-comments" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1752 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22392 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0