June 2018 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1040: 22120-Integrate-Iceberg-v110
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 11, 2018

June 11, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1040 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1523 was integrated: "22120-Integrate-Iceberg-v110" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1523 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22120 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1039: 22111 font chooser package should be fonts chooser
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 11, 2018

June 11, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1039 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1517 was integrated: "22111 font chooser package should be fonts chooser" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1517 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22111 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1038: 22107-DockingBarMorph-should-have-its-own-entry-in-the-theme-to-define-the-border-width
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 11, 2018

June 11, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1038 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1514 was integrated: "22107-DockingBarMorph-should-have-its-own-entry-in-the-theme-to-define-the-border-width" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1514 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22107 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

About infinite debuggers in tests (https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22085/Infinite-debugger)
by Steven Costiou June 11, 2018

June 11, 2018

Hi, Is that normal that in the following method we do "EX PASS" (at the end)? runCaseForDebug: aTestCase [ aTestCase announce: TestCaseStarted withResult: self. aTestCase runCaseManaged. aTestCase announce: TestCaseEnded withResult: self. "To not affect performance of big test suites following logic is not inside addPass: method" errors remove: aTestCase ifAbsent: [ ]. failures remove: aTestCase ifAbsent: [ ]. self addPass: aTestCase ] on: self class failure , self class skip , self class warning , self class error do: [ :ex | ex sunitAnnounce: aTestCase toResult: self. EX PASS ] I think it is the source of the infinite crazy debugger bug (maybe i'm wrong) https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22085/Infinite-debugger Doing "ex debug" solves the problem but i do not know the impact (pharo 5 - 6 - 7, but not previous versions). For what i understand, it happens because : - when you got an error in a test, it goes through the ex pass - but when you got a doesNotUnderstand, it first goes into: doesNotUnderstand: aMessage <debuggerCompleteToSender> | exception resumeValue | (exception := MessageNotUnderstood new) message: aMessage; receiver: self. RESUMEVALUE := EXCEPTION SIGNAL. ^exception reachedDefaultHandler ifTrue: [AMESSAGE SENTTO: SELF] ifFalse: [resumeValue] In normal cases (class of the receiver is not a test case), when you step in the debugger the EXCEPTION SIGNAL blocks the execution right away. In subclasses of TESTCASE, it does EX PASS each time you signal the exception and so it continues in the doesNotUnderstand. Then it enters the AMESSAGE SENTTO: SELF in the doesNotUnderstand, which is still not understood and goes again into the "ex pass", then you can wait a long time... I'm not really sure though why it does not open another debugger and why it gets stuck. Maybe that is the real bug: it should open another debugger and not loop and pop one million debugging windows after a user interruption. Another side effect is that the watchdog of the TestExecutionEnvironment also gets stuck and stops counting for the timeout, because a debugging session was open and never closed (because its looping). See TestExecutionEnvironment>>watchDogLoopFor:. Replacing EX PASS by EX DEBUG seems to work and reproduce the standard behavior of the debugger for classes that are not subclasses of TestCase. But i do not know if the "pass" was explicitly intended and if there will be side effects... Steven.

2 1

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1037: 22108 Cleanup Text-Scanning
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 11, 2018

June 11, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1037 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1515 was integrated: "22108 Cleanup Text-Scanning" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1515 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22108 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

Esteban's ChangeLog week of 4 June 2018
by estebanlm＠gmail.com June 11, 2018

June 11, 2018

Hello! This is my weekly ChangeLog, from 4 June 2018 to 10 June 2018. You can see it in a better format by going here: http://log.smallworks.eu/web/search?from=4/6/2018&to=10/6/2018 ChangeLog ========= 8 June 2018: ------------ * Well... I spent last two days making work this PR: [https://github.com/Metacello/metacello/pull/490](https://github.com/Metacel… The title of this is "allow filetree alternate formats". What that means? By this PR, the +filetree://+ selector becomes a "generic" selector, capable of decide which kind of file format we are using. This formats are for now cypress (what you usually know as "filetree") and tonel, but we could add others in the future. I'm waiting for integration to also submit a PR to update P7. 5 June 2018: ------------ * In Pharo, we are replacing usages of #asIcon with #iconNamed: so I prepared iceberg to this. You can check the PR here: [https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg/pull/834](https://github.com/pharo-vcs… * Ok, last week I announced [Tonel](https://github.com/pharo-vcs/tonel) was now capable of write Stateful Traits. Yes, that was true... but it was working just for writing, not for reading. Reading needed a bit more work, which you can now found in this commit: [https://github.com/pharo-vcs/tonel/commit/166fd130e93d814e69c9d938429c89083… * To make Tonel read properly stateful traits, there was a missing method on Monticello (yep, there). So I added [case: 22065](https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22065) and there is a PR to solve it: [https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1485](https://github.com/pharo-…. * Found a bug on OSWindow-SDL2 and fixed it. You can check it at [case: 22063](https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22063) and PR [https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1483](https://github.com/pharo-… cheers! Esteban

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1036: 22060-Improve-KMMetaModifier-logic-to-match-events
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1036 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1503 was integrated: "22060-Improve-KMMetaModifier-logic-to-match-events" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1503 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22060 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1035: 22110 Categorize and comment Job Manifest
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1035 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1516 was integrated: "22110 Categorize and comment Job Manifest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1516 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22110 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1034: 22097-InlineMethodRefactoring-internal-
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1034 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1512 was integrated: "22097-InlineMethodRefactoring-internal-" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1512 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22097 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #1033: 21949 not possible to save settings
by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #1033 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1439 was integrated: "21949 not possible to save settings" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1439 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21949 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

1 0