July 2013 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[FogBugz] new pre-defined filters
by Marcus Denker July 30, 2013

July 30, 2013

Hi, I have changed the one "all open" filter into three: 1) all sorted by project https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/33/All-by-project 2) all newest first https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/57/All-newest-first 3) all sorted by priority https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/62/All-priority

1 0

[update 3.0] #30314
by Marcus Denker July 29, 2013

July 29, 2013

30314 ----- 11263 isNil ifTrue: to ifNil: part 3 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11263 11264 isNil ifTrue: to ifNil: part 4 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11264/ Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Tools-MarcusDenker.120.d… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Ring-Core-Kernel-MarcusDenker… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Polymorph-Widgets-MarcusDenke… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Gofer-Core-MarcusDenker.196.d… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Collections-Strings-MarcusDen… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.180.diff

2 2

[update 3.0] #30313
by Marcus Denker July 29, 2013

July 29, 2013

1 0

[update 3.0] #30312
by Marcus Denker July 29, 2013

July 29, 2013

30312 ----- 11226 Kill update: from Object https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11226 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/System-Support-MarcusDenker.8… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Morphic-Base-MarcusDenker.56.…

1 0

[update 3.0] #30311
by Marcus Denker July 29, 2013

July 29, 2013

1 0

[update 3.0] #30310
by Marcus Denker July 29, 2013

July 29, 2013

30310 ----- 5469 SHA1 duplicated implementations https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/5469 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Tests-MarcusDenker.600.diff http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/System-Hashing-MarcusDenker.2… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/KeyChain-MarcusDenker.45.diff

1 0

[regression reporter]regression occurred
by no-reply＠ci.inria.fr July 28, 2013

July 28, 2013

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/label=win/… 1 regressions found. KernelTests.Processes.ProcessTest.testHighPriorityOverridesWaitTime

1 0

[update 3.0] #30309
by Marcus Denker July 28, 2013

July 28, 2013

30309 ----- 11258 update 30308 lost class instance variable in ChangeSet https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11258 10097 HandMorph>>showDebugEvents:true --> too small a rectangle with bigger fonts https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10097 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/System-Changes-MarcusDenker.2… http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Morphic-Base-MarcusDenker.54.…

1 0

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Unix Domain Sockets
by Sven Van Caekenberghe July 28, 2013

July 28, 2013

On 28 Jul 2013, at 17:20, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 01:12:41PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> Since UDP sockets are currently also in the same class, I don't see a >> need for a separate class in the current design. > > Hi Sven. Agreed, as I wrote in the other mail about gaining experience with > IPv6 as well. OK >> Yes, the code is too cryptic/technical, a helper method or two would >> solve this. > > Done as per my newest blog post. Will add that when I create the issue. Yes, I've seen it. Good, that is what I meant. >>> Also, I'll be looking into the minor changes needed to support >>> SocketStream as well. >> >> Can you elaborate on that ? > > SocketStream has instance creation methods such as > openConnectionToHost:port:. To use Unix domain sockets, I imagine something > like openConnectionToIPCSocketPath:. Ah, OK, I understand. But there is SocketStream class>>#on: once you have your socket. That should be enough for testing client and server side. Once you validated it works, you could indeed add the #openConnectionToIPCSocketPath: convenience method. >> To add this, I would like some minimal tests as well (to be skipped on >> windows). > > I took a peek at SocketTest; the setUp method sets up a server socket, and > tests are run against this socket. This kinda like requires what is being > tested to be working in the first place? I understand your point, it is possible to have interesting theoretical discussions about unit tests, but a test that exercises the code is much better than none at all. If you don't like the setup of SocketTest, write your own test class, like DomainSocketTest. Tests are really important: they are live, validated documentation. Regarding the last blog post, does that mean that a VM change is now necessary or not ? Thanks for contributing ! Sven > Cheers. > > -- > Pierce Ng > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/

1 0

July 28, 2013

super! Stef On Jul 28, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:12:27AM +0200, St?phane Ducasse wrote: >> This is nice to see some progress on Socket. >> - What is the license of the code? >> - Do you want to give it to the community? > > Hi Stef. Yes, I'm happy for these changes to be folded into Pharo. I'll > file an entry into the issue tracker. The license of the code is MIT, to > match Pharo's. > > Cheers. > > -- > Pierce Ng > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/ > >

1 0