June 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14010
by StÃ©phane Ducasse June 24, 2011

June 24, 2011

14010 ----- - Issue 4439: Allow cherry-picking when merging. Second part removing MCConflict. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4439 - Issue 4448: Cleaning MC conflicts Stef and Igor

1 0

[Pharo-project] ImageMap
by Pavel Krivanek June 24, 2011

June 24, 2011

Hi, I generated an image map for the latest PharoKernel image http://windmap.cz/playground/imagemap/1.html Let's hunt waste :-) -- Pavel

2 2

[Pharo-project] Proposal to refactor MethodFinder with pragmas
by Damien Cassou June 24, 2011

June 24, 2011

Currently MethodFinder uses a list of acceptable selectors to execute. This list of selectors is not maintained which results in a lot of selectors to exist only in this list as they have been removed in the system. I propose to use pragmas on classes to generate this list automatically. Here is an example Magnitude class>>finderApprovedMethods <finderApproveInstanceMethod: #max:> <finderApproveInstanceMethod: #min:> <finderApproveInstanceMethod: #min:max:> <finderApproveInstanceMethod: #< > <finderApproveInstanceMethod: #<= > <finderApproveInstanceMethod: #< > <finderApproveInstanceMethod: #<= > <finderApproveInstanceMethod: #between:and: > What do you think? -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry

4 5

[Pharo-project] [update 1.4] #14009
by StÃ©phane Ducasse June 24, 2011

June 24, 2011

14009 ----- - Issue 4439: Allow cherry-picking when merging. Thanks Igor Stasenko. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4439 Added more class comments and cleaning method categories Stef and igor

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13273
by Marcus Denker June 24, 2011

June 24, 2011

On Jun 24, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Marcus, > > I am a bit confused, before this update my core 1.3 image updated to #13272 and asked to go to 1.4. > I said yes. Now I have: > > Pharo1.4a > Latest update: #13272 > > But I can no longer update. It seems to be looking for 14.... updates. > Normally it should load the updates of 1.4, which are just the same as the ones in 1.3 for now... > I have not yet seen anything about starting 1.4 on the mailing list ? The reason is that nothing yet was done... it's tracking the 1.3 updates. I wanted to announce it / do more but have not come around doing that.... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13273
by Marcus Denker June 24, 2011

June 24, 2011

13273 ----- Issue 4434: CrLfFileStream>>#lineEndingConvention: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4434 Issue 4129: #assert:equals: is the opposite as expected http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4129 Issue 4437: safer FreeTypeSettings>>#monitorType http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4437 -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

2 1

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13274
by Marcus Denker June 24, 2011

June 24, 2011

13274 ----- Issue 4445: shrinkToKernel later ChangeSets cleanup http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4445 Issue 4436: HandMorph mouseTrailFrom: problem http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4436 Issue 4443: StrikeFontSet isSynthetic http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4443 -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

2 2

[Pharo-project] [COTDC] 75 - MorphTreeNavigationBar
by laurent laffont June 23, 2011

June 23, 2011

Today: MorphTreeNavigationBar Comment Of The Day Contest - One Day One Comment Rules: #1: Each day a not commented class is elected. Each day the best comment will be integrated with name of the author(s). #2: If you cannot comment it, deprecate it. Results: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest Laurent

1 1

[Pharo-project] [PBE-Spanish] Status update 2011-06-21
by Nicolas Paez June 23, 2011

June 23, 2011

Hello everyone, Here is the weekly update of the Spanish translation of Pharo By Example book. *Summary* * Just 4 charpters remaining to complete the rough translation. * During this week we will focus on completing the translation of the remaining chapters and on fixing the compilation errors we are getting. * We have also started to define the revision process. * By end of June we will publish a new drop with the completed chapters. *Chapters drill down* Chapter 01: 80% Chapter 02: completed, but not published yet and with compilation errors Chapter 03: completed, already published Chapter 04: completed, already published Chapter 05: completed, but not published yet and with compilation errors Chapter 06: 21% Chapter 07: completed, and with compilation errors Chapter 08: completed, and with compilation errors Chapter 09: completed, and with compilation errors Chapter 10: just started Chapter 11: completed, already published Chapter 12: 52% Chapter 13: completed, and with compilation errors Chapter 14: completed Regards, NicoPaez http://nicopaez.wordpress.com

6 9

Re: [Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Fwd: Faster That light
by Mariano Martinez Peck June 23, 2011

June 23, 2011

I have worked the last days on a generic connection pool for Pharo. The > objective is to improve performances for an application that uses a network > data source (databases, LDAP, etc.). > > Hi Olivier. First, let me say that we really appreciate your project and we are happy with it :) Now, to avoid reinventing the wheel, I want to point you some stuff. 1) There is a GlorpDBX connection pool available. This is the package GlorpDBX-ConnectionPool. Documentation: http://www.squeakdbx.org/documentation/SqueakDBX%20connection%20pool%20for%… 2) There is a general purpose pool (for any kind of object) that also work in Glorp or DBXTalk. http://www.squeaksource.com/ObjectPool There is a package ObjectPool-GlorpDBX :) I cc'ed Panu, the developer. So...maybe you can join forces with him? > My work is now stable and the gain of performances is good. For exemple, I > have a benchmark that uses a SqueakDBX/PostgreSQL database and a LDAP > directory. Without the pool, the test take 6,61s, with the pool, only 0,367s > :-) > > I have made many stress tests for testing the fiability. This morning, the > connection pools has processed 270000 requests without problems. > > I think that my project can interest you. > > sure it does!!! > I don't know if the code is ready for production. > > It doesn't matter. It is good to know about it. > > The projet is on squeaksource and I have added your account (and Stef also) > as Guest. > > MCHttpRepository > location: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/FasterThatLight' > user: '' > password: '' > > Thanks for remarks and critics. > > Thanks. I will take a look. For the pools, the expert is Diogenes and Panu :) Best regards, -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com

1 0