May 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13194
by StÃ©phane Ducasse May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

13194 ----- - Issue 4015: Fix in SmalltalkEditor. Stef

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] Re: Highlight problem with glamour
by Marcus Denker May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

On May 12, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > > I did not mean that someone should look into the posted code. I was in a hurry and I simply asked a direct question if anyone has any idea of why 4096 would be a limit for highlighting text in TextMorph. The question had nothing to do with Glamour, but I am sorry if the form of the mail made you waste your time. > > In any case, I will look into this in more details. > maybe this is relevant? We should release 1.2.2.... http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4157 -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

2 2

Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] Re: Highlight problem with glamour
by Marcus Denker May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

On May 12, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > On 12 May 2011, at 16:44, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> >> On May 12, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >>> >>> I did not mean that someone should look into the posted code. I was in a hurry and I simply asked a direct question if anyone has any idea of why 4096 would be a limit for highlighting text in TextMorph. The question had nothing to do with Glamour, but I am sorry if the form of the mail made you waste your time. >>> >>> In any case, I will look into this in more details. >>> >> >> >> maybe this is relevant? We should release 1.2.2.... >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4157 > > Hmm. Sounds similar, but I am too ignorant. > > I could reproduce the problem outside of Glamour. The issue is indeed not with TextMorph, but with PluggableTextMorph: > > string := ''. > 1 to: 1000 do: [:i | string := string, 'abcde']. > text := ((string asText addAttribute: TextColor red), ('xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' asText)). > (PluggableTextMorph on: text text: #yourself accept: #value) openInWindow > works fine in 1.2.2a -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

Re: [Pharo-project] [Moose-dev] Re: Highlight problem with glamour
by Marcus Denker May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

On May 12, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Thanks, Fabrizio. > > I noticed a similar problem with highlighting Java code, but I thought it was related to the grammar. > > I CC-ed the Pharo mailing list. > > Anyone knows why it would be a problem to highlight text with more than 4096 characters in a TextMorph? > Which version of Pharo are you using? > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 12 May 2011, at 16:03, Fabrizio Perin wrote: > >> It basically breaks after 4096 characters. >> >> >> On 12 May 2011, at 16:02, Fabrizio Perin wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> i was playing with textlint and i noticed that the highlight is broken. Seems that the problem is related to the length of the text. If you try to execute the script below you notice that the highlight doesn't work. If you lower 1000 to 100 it works. It seems that the break point is 194. After that it dies. >>> >>> | browser | >>> browser := GLMTabulator new. >>> browser >>> column: #details. >>> >>> "if you need initial display" >>> browser transmit to: #details; andShow: [:a | >>> a text display: [:x | >>> | string | >>> string := ''.1 to: 1000 do: [:i | string := string, 'jjjjj j j j j j jjj j']. >>> (string asText addAttribute: TextColor red), ('jjjjj j j j j j jjj j' asText) ] ]. >>> >>> browser openOn: 5 >>> >>> Any idea? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Fabrizio >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal." > > > > > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

2 1

[Pharo-project] [BUG][FIX] CompiledMethodTrailer
by Igor Stasenko May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

Okay, seems like i found the bug. (CompiledMethodTrailer new sourcePointer: 0) testEncoding fails. And it happens only when you pass 0 as source pointer!! Such an obscure case! @squeakers, for the context, check the discussion "Problem with CompiledMethodTrailer" in pharo-dev list. On 10 May 2011 12:47, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> > I must be wrong, because the dev image when it is build, it calls all >> > cleanUp methods for classes, so CompiledMethod class >> cleanUp shuld >> > have >> > been called, but if I take the Pharo1.3 result, I can see the source >> > code >> > (not decompiled) >> > >> >> But you can't see the source of those methods in browser, because >> browser works only with installed methods >> while cleanup touching only non-installed ones. > > > grrrr sorry, I forgot about the #isInstalled ... I went directly to see > #destroySourcePointer > heheheh > >> >> >> >> >> When i do this, my image hangs. >> > >> > I have just tried and it crash!!!Â Actually, I evaluated CompiledMethod >> > cleanUp. And just after cmd+b in CompiledMethod (to browse it) -> crash >> > How it is possilbe it didn't crash while building the dev image?Â Â or >> > the >> > first time I browse a class? >> > maybe this incorrect CM are created by the build process just after the >> > cleanUp ? >> > >> I don't know yet. >> Maybe there is some test, which breaking them when it runs? Or tests >> are not run on those images? > > I was thinking exactly the same. But no, this image has not run the tests. > There are other images specially to download from hudson that are those > after running tests :( > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

2 3

[Pharo-project] OCompletion
by Benjamin May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

Hi everyone, I have just a stupid question but how can I load OCompletion ? I've tried to load packages but I just got a tons of DNU ... Is there a magic formula somewhere over the web ? Thanks in advance, Ben

3 2

Re: [Pharo-project] legal counsel for pharo?
by Marcus Denker May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

On May 12, 2011, at 3:58 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Randall > > what is the position of squeak regarding the inclusion of qwak code in squeak? My position is to *not* let any GPLed code in Pharo. Because this means that everything is GPL, and that people therefore will have problems using it to make money in many cases. (and no, the GPL does not help to get contributions back: I *do not want* contributions of code where the author is forced to release code...) Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

2 1

Re: [Pharo-project] Cog doesn't load anymore in PharoCore1.3 because of the removal of AbstractLauncher
by Marcus Denker May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

On May 12, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > sooo.. opinions? > We can add the class the the compatiblity package... > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > If Cog really needs it we should create a separate repostiroy like PharoCogSupport and put the class there and add it as a dependency of Cog in ConfigurationOfCog. > Another hacky way is to add a #preLoadDoit: in ConfigurationOfCog that does a #compile: of AbstractLauncher > > Cheers > > Mariano > > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > AbstractLauncher was removed in: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4002 > > Cog has a subclass from AbstractLauncher called CommandLineLauncher, hence, it cannot be loaded anymore > > CommandLineLauncher has no class comment and no sender. So I have no idea what it does, nor if it can be removed from cog, nor how to solve this problem in Pharo. > > Cheers > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0

[Pharo-project] legal counsel for pharo?
by merlyn＠stonehenge.com May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

A question recently came up on the squeak-dev mailing list about the legality of including GPL code in Squeak core, as to where the line might be. This is especially interesting because of the OpenQwaq release recently. I was able to answer the question for Squeak core definitively by saying "if you have questions, Squeak is part of the SFC, so we have legal representation through the SFLC". This permits potential contributors to get free legal advice about whether their code would be permitted into Squeak core without violating the Apache/MIT license. Which got me wondering, for Pharo, what's the equivalent? Have you guys retained a lawyer or other arrangements for which you can sort out license issues? Who is the "SFLC" equivalent for Pharo? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn(a)stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion

2 4

Re: [Pharo-project] Mailinglist archive not working
by Marcus Denker May 12, 2011

May 12, 2011

On May 12, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > Looks like the mail archive is not working: > > See http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2011-May/date.html > last mail is from May 10 13:44:40 > > Anyone able to tell the inria admins... > > Yes... not only the archive, at least me, I did not get any mail for 2 days... But this has now been fixed. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

1 0