- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Where is the license agreement document?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I could not find it on http://pharo.gforge.inria.fr/ :( > Thanks. From there this link http://pharo.gforge.inria.fr/licenseDocuments/ > throws a 404. Stef

July 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Unix Domain Sockets

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

super! Stef On Jul 28, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:12:27AM +0200, St?phane Ducasse wrote: >> This is nice to see some progress on Socket. >> - What is the license of the code? >> - Do you want to give it to the community? > > Hi Stef. Yes, I'm happy for these changes to be folded into Pharo. I'll > file an entry into the issue tracker. The license of the code is MIT, to > match Pharo's. > > Cheers. > > -- > Pierce Ng > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/ > >

July 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Unix Domain Sockets

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

thanks for the report apparently it got lost somewhere. On Jul 28, 2013, at 5:03 PM, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > Hi Igor, > > Thanks. From there this link http://pharo.gforge.inria.fr/licenseDocuments/ > throws a 404.

July 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Unix Domain Sockets

by Pierce Ng

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 01:12:41PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Since UDP sockets are currently also in the same class, I don't see a > need for a separate class in the current design. Hi Sven. Agreed, as I wrote in the other mail about gaining experience with IPv6 as well. > Yes, the code is too cryptic/technical, a helper method or two would > solve this. Done as per my newest blog post. Will add that when I create the issue. > > Also, I'll be looking into the minor changes needed to support > > SocketStream as well. > > Can you elaborate on that ? SocketStream has instance creation methods such as openConnectionToHost:port:. To use Unix domain sockets, I imagine something like openConnectionToIPCSocketPath:. > To add this, I would like some minimal tests as well (to be skipped on > windows). I took a peek at SocketTest; the setUp method sets up a server socket, and tests are run against this socket. This kinda like requires what is being tested to be working in the first place? Cheers. -- Pierce Ng http://samadhiweb.com/blog/

July 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Unix Domain Sockets

by Pierce Ng

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:12:27AM +0200, St?phane Ducasse wrote: > This is nice to see some progress on Socket. > - What is the license of the code? > - Do you want to give it to the community? Hi Stef. Yes, I'm happy for these changes to be folded into Pharo. I'll file an entry into the issue tracker. The license of the code is MIT, to match Pharo's. Cheers. -- Pierce Ng http://samadhiweb.com/blog/

July 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Unix Domain Sockets

by Pierce Ng

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 04:59:32AM +0200, Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 28 July 2013 03:46, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > > Maybe this is the wrong list to ask, but how do I contribute this to Pharo? > http://www.pharo-project.org/community/how-to-contribute Hi Igor, Thanks. From there this link http://pharo.gforge.inria.fr/licenseDocuments/ throws a 404. > About unix sockets: i see the changes is not really big and easy to integrate. > My only question regarding this, how do you think, maybe it make sense to have > a separate class for it, so users can tell: > > UnixSocket new > > instead of > > Socket newIPC I went for minimal change. As Socket already has newTCP and newUDP instance creation methods, I use newICP. Since the VM apparently also supports IPv6, I'd suggest to defer on creating separate classes until there is more experience using Unix domain *and* IPv6 TCP/UDP sockets, alongside current code that is using TCP/UDP over IPv4. > i also think that if socket creation failed, the code should throw an > error rather than return nil. Ditto, I followed current behaviour. Not quite Smalltalk-like, I agree. Cheers. -- Pierce Ng http://samadhiweb.com/blog/

July 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Unix Domain Sockets

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Hi Pierce, On 28 Jul 2013, at 03:46, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I want to share that I wrote a blog post on using Unix domain sockets in > Pharo. > > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/2013.07.27.unixdomainsockets.html Cool. We need to integrate this: there is VM support for it and it works with minimal additions. Since UDP sockets are currently also in the same class, I don't see a need for a separate class in the current design. > The NetNameResolver bits can be made more Smalltalk-ish. Yes, the code is too cryptic/technical, a helper method or two would solve this. > Also, I'll be looking into the minor changes needed to support SocketStream as well. Can you elaborate on that ? > Maybe this is the wrong list to ask, but how do I contribute this to Pharo? To add this, I would like some minimal tests as well (to be skipped on windows). Sven > Cheers. > > -- > Pierce Ng > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/ -- Sven Van Caekenberghe Proudly supporting Pharo http://pharo.org http://association.pharo.org http://consortium.pharo.org

July 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Fun with symbols

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

tx! On Jul 28, 2013, at 9:49 AM, jannik.laval <jannik.laval(a)gmail.com> wrote: > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11257 > > Jannik > > On Jul 27, 2013, at 10:45 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> Jannik can you >> - write a test >> - add a bug entry >> >> This would be to align this point. And also verify it in VW, Squeak and other. >> >> Stef >> >> On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:43 PM, jannik.laval <jannik.laval(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Something I did not know and I would like to share: >>> what is the result of "#a < #9" ? DNU ! >>> >>> When I expected to compare two symbols, in fact "#9 class" returns SmallInteger. >>> So if I want to compare two symbols, I have to do "#a < #'9' ". >>> >>> Kind of small fun things ! >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Jannik >> >> >

July 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Unix Domain Sockets

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hello This is nice to see some progress on Socket. - What is the license of the code? - Do you want to give it to the community? - I like the suggestion of igor to have a new class. Stef > Hello, > > I want to share that I wrote a blog post on using Unix domain sockets in > Pharo. > > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/2013.07.27.unixdomainsockets.html > > The NetNameResolver bits can be made more Smalltalk-ish. Also, I'll be > looking into the minor changes needed to support SocketStream as well. > > Maybe this is the wrong list to ask, but how do I contribute this to Pharo? > > > Cheers. > > -- > Pierce Ng > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/ > >

July 28, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Fun with symbols

by jannik.laval

https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11257 Jannik On Jul 27, 2013, at 10:45 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Jannik can you > - write a test > - add a bug entry > > This would be to align this point. And also verify it in VW, Squeak and other. > > Stef > > On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:43 PM, jannik.laval <jannik.laval(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> Something I did not know and I would like to share: >> what is the result of "#a < #9" ? DNU ! >> >> When I expected to compare two symbols, in fact "#9 class" returns SmallInteger. >> So if I want to compare two symbols, I have to do "#a < #'9' ". >> >> Kind of small fun things ! >> Cheers, >> >> Jannik > >

July 28, 2013