- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Package Dependencies Analysis : new features

by stepharo

Baptiste monday we will do a analysis day together :) Stef On 23/7/14 14:49, Baptiste Quide wrote: > Hello Pharos Users, > > Since the first release of Package Dependencies Analysis, here is a > summary of improvements : > > - tool is available in World Menu (Tools > Package Dependencies > Browser) : choose your packages and browse dependencies. > - add/remove packages into the analysis. > - you can refresh the current analysis manually (for instance if you > change a piece of code to remove/add dependency) > - filter the packages displaying by name > - button "find cycles" allows to find all cycles in the system where > the selected packages in the tree are (it could take a while the > first time you click) > - contextual menu (right click) to browse scoped dependencies or find > cycles among the selected packages in the tree > > Then, in the window displaying cycles among packages : > > - only dependencies among packages in the cycle are displaying (no > outgoing dependencies) > - packages appear by order (if you see aCycle : A, B, C, the cycle is > A -> B -> C -> A) > > See more details : http://www.baptistequide.fr/packagedependencies.php > > Regards, > > Baptiste

July 24, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] What should I do when I get a fogbugz "Fix review needed"?

by Sean P. DeNigris

Tim Mackinnon wrote > then Iâve done âmergeâ (Iâm still not clear on whether I should do merge > or load? You were correct. "Always" merge slices. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/What-should-I-do-when-I-get-a-fogbugz-Fix-review-need… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

July 24, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Package Dependencies Analysis : new features

by HernÃ¡n Morales Durand

Thanks Baptiste for taking care of this. Cheers, HernÃ¡n 2014-07-23 9:49 GMT-03:00 Baptiste Quide <baptiste.quide(a)inria.fr>: > Hello Pharos Users, > > Since the first release of Package Dependencies Analysis, here is a > summary of improvements : > > - tool is available in World Menu (Tools > Package Dependencies Browser) : > choose your packages and browse dependencies. > - add/remove packages into the analysis. > - you can refresh the current analysis manually (for instance if you > change a piece of code to remove/add dependency) > - filter the packages displaying by name > - button "find cycles" allows to find all cycles in the system where the > selected packages in the tree are (it could take a while the first time > you click) > - contextual menu (right click) to browse scoped dependencies or find > cycles among the selected packages in the tree > > Then, in the window displaying cycles among packages : > > - only dependencies among packages in the cycle are displaying (no > outgoing dependencies) > - packages appear by order (if you see aCycle : A, B, C, the cycle is A -> > B -> C -> A) > > See more details : http://www.baptistequide.fr/packagedependencies.php > > Regards, > > Baptiste >

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] What should I do when I get a fogbugz "Fix review needed"?

by Damien Cassou

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Tim Mackinnon <tamackinnon(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Can someone just clarify that for me? you should also mark it as "fix reviewed" -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchill

July 23, 2014

Package Dependencies Analysis : new features

by Baptiste Quide

Hello Pharos Users, Since the first release of Package Dependencies Analysis, here is a summary of improvements : - tool is available in World Menu (Tools > Package Dependencies Browser) : choose your packages and browse dependencies. - add/remove packages into the analysis. - you can refresh the current analysis manually (for instance if you change a piece of code to remove/add dependency) - filter the packages displaying by name - button "find cycles" allows to find all cycles in the system where the selected packages in the tree are (it could take a while the first time you click) - contextual menu (right click) to browse scoped dependencies or find cycles among the selected packages in the tree Then, in the window displaying cycles among packages : - only dependencies among packages in the cycle are displaying (no outgoing dependencies) - packages appear by order (if you see aCycle : A, B, C, the cycle is A -> B -> C -> A) See more details : http://www.baptistequide.fr/packagedependencies.php Regards, Baptiste

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo launcher network error for Pharo 4.0 (beta)?

by Ben Coman

Tim Mackinnon wrote: > Yes its weird - I can view http://files.pharo.org/image/40/ fine in a web > browser. It seems to affect 4.0 and 2.0. > > 3.0 and RModJenkins etc all expand correctly. > > The status bar was saying 4 network errors (although checking now, it says > 7). > > It could be connectivity in this office, so I can check it from home - but > it seems weird that some work and others don't. > > Tim > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-launcher-network-error-for-Pharo-4-0-beta-tp476… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Only a very random thought, maybe proxy issues?

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Refactoring project: improvements

by Mark Rizun

Hi Gabriel, I agree with you that my "extract to temp" may be not really a refactoring anymore. And maybe you're right about adding extra option, I should think about it. Thanks Mark 2014-07-23 13:33 GMT+02:00 Gabriel Cotelli <g.cotelli(a)gmail.com>: > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for taking care of improving the refactoring tools. > > Just a side note, if you modify the Extract to temporary refactoring to > change all the references (as your blog post suggest) then exists cases > when this is no longer a refactoring. If the extracted code has side > effects is not the same to send this messages one or several times and a > refactoring is supposed to be safe. > > I think you should let the old behavior as a refactoring, and add this new > one (very useful indeed) making clear that is not a refactoring. > > Regards, > Gabriel > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Mark Rizun <mrizun(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is a summary of what is done on improving refactorings. >> /Refactoring(enhancement)/ >> - Extract to temporary(renaming duplicates) >> - Rename method(permutation of args) >> - Rename inst var(renames accessors) >> For more details read my blog: >> http://myfuncoding.blogspot.fr/2014/07/improved-refactorings.html >> Feedback & re-tweets are welcome:) >> >> Best, >> Mark >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Refactoring-project-improvements-tp4769273.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Refactoring project: improvements

by Gabriel Cotelli

Hi Mark, Thanks for taking care of improving the refactoring tools. Just a side note, if you modify the Extract to temporary refactoring to change all the references (as your blog post suggest) then exists cases when this is no longer a refactoring. If the extracted code has side effects is not the same to send this messages one or several times and a refactoring is supposed to be safe. I think you should let the old behavior as a refactoring, and add this new one (very useful indeed) making clear that is not a refactoring. Regards, Gabriel On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Mark Rizun <mrizun(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is a summary of what is done on improving refactorings. > /Refactoring(enhancement)/ > - Extract to temporary(renaming duplicates) > - Rename method(permutation of args) > - Rename inst var(renames accessors) > For more details read my blog: > http://myfuncoding.blogspot.fr/2014/07/improved-refactorings.html > Feedback & re-tweets are welcome:) > > Best, > Mark > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Refactoring-project-improvements-tp4769273.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Filesystem bug or limitation?

by Ben Coman

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] ODBC package on STHub

by stepharo

Thanks Torsten. Every little steps are cool and welcomed! On 23/7/14 12:42, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > The ODBC package is now migrated from SqueakSource to SmalltalkHub > and available under > > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/ODBC > > I also cleaned up a little bit and made some stuff working > on Pharo 3.0 again. You can now als easily load it from the config > browser. > > Repo is open for contributions. Have fun. > > Thanks > T. > > >

July 23, 2014