July 2014 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Package Dependencies Analysis : new features

by Baptiste Quide

Hello Pharos Users, Since the first release of Package Dependencies Analysis, here is a summary of improvements : - tool is available in World Menu (Tools > Package Dependencies Browser) : choose your packages and browse dependencies. - add/remove packages into the analysis. - you can refresh the current analysis manually (for instance if you change a piece of code to remove/add dependency) - filter the packages displaying by name - button "find cycles" allows to find all cycles in the system where the selected packages in the tree are (it could take a while the first time you click) - contextual menu (right click) to browse scoped dependencies or find cycles among the selected packages in the tree Then, in the window displaying cycles among packages : - only dependencies among packages in the cycle are displaying (no outgoing dependencies) - packages appear by order (if you see aCycle : A, B, C, the cycle is A -> B -> C -> A) See more details : http://www.baptistequide.fr/packagedependencies.php Regards, Baptiste

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo launcher network error for Pharo 4.0 (beta)?

by Ben Coman

Tim Mackinnon wrote: > Yes its weird - I can view http://files.pharo.org/image/40/ fine in a web > browser. It seems to affect 4.0 and 2.0. > > 3.0 and RModJenkins etc all expand correctly. > > The status bar was saying 4 network errors (although checking now, it says > 7). > > It could be connectivity in this office, so I can check it from home - but > it seems weird that some work and others don't. > > Tim > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-launcher-network-error-for-Pharo-4-0-beta-tp476… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Only a very random thought, maybe proxy issues?

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Refactoring project: improvements

by Mark Rizun

Hi Gabriel, I agree with you that my "extract to temp" may be not really a refactoring anymore. And maybe you're right about adding extra option, I should think about it. Thanks Mark 2014-07-23 13:33 GMT+02:00 Gabriel Cotelli <g.cotelli(a)gmail.com>: > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for taking care of improving the refactoring tools. > > Just a side note, if you modify the Extract to temporary refactoring to > change all the references (as your blog post suggest) then exists cases > when this is no longer a refactoring. If the extracted code has side > effects is not the same to send this messages one or several times and a > refactoring is supposed to be safe. > > I think you should let the old behavior as a refactoring, and add this new > one (very useful indeed) making clear that is not a refactoring. > > Regards, > Gabriel > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Mark Rizun <mrizun(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is a summary of what is done on improving refactorings. >> /Refactoring(enhancement)/ >> - Extract to temporary(renaming duplicates) >> - Rename method(permutation of args) >> - Rename inst var(renames accessors) >> For more details read my blog: >> http://myfuncoding.blogspot.fr/2014/07/improved-refactorings.html >> Feedback & re-tweets are welcome:) >> >> Best, >> Mark >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Refactoring-project-improvements-tp4769273.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Refactoring project: improvements

by Gabriel Cotelli

Hi Mark, Thanks for taking care of improving the refactoring tools. Just a side note, if you modify the Extract to temporary refactoring to change all the references (as your blog post suggest) then exists cases when this is no longer a refactoring. If the extracted code has side effects is not the same to send this messages one or several times and a refactoring is supposed to be safe. I think you should let the old behavior as a refactoring, and add this new one (very useful indeed) making clear that is not a refactoring. Regards, Gabriel On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Mark Rizun <mrizun(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is a summary of what is done on improving refactorings. > /Refactoring(enhancement)/ > - Extract to temporary(renaming duplicates) > - Rename method(permutation of args) > - Rename inst var(renames accessors) > For more details read my blog: > http://myfuncoding.blogspot.fr/2014/07/improved-refactorings.html > Feedback & re-tweets are welcome:) > > Best, > Mark > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Refactoring-project-improvements-tp4769273.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Filesystem bug or limitation?

by Ben Coman

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] ODBC package on STHub

by stepharo

Thanks Torsten. Every little steps are cool and welcomed! On 23/7/14 12:42, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > The ODBC package is now migrated from SqueakSource to SmalltalkHub > and available under > > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/ODBC > > I also cleaned up a little bit and made some stuff working > on Pharo 3.0 again. You can now als easily load it from the config > browser. > > Repo is open for contributions. Have fun. > > Thanks > T. > > >

July 23, 2014

[ANN] ODBC package on STHub

by Torsten Bergmann

The ODBC package is now migrated from SqueakSource to SmalltalkHub and available under http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/ODBC I also cleaned up a little bit and made some stuff working on Pharo 3.0 again. You can now als easily load it from the config browser. Repo is open for contributions. Have fun. Thanks T.

July 23, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] What should I do when I get a fogbugz "Fix review needed"?

by Nicolai Hess

2014-07-22 17:10 GMT+02:00 Tim Mackinnon <tamackinnon(a)gmail.com>: > If I report a bug in fogbugz and it later gets fixed, I get an email with > the slice its fixed in. > > So Iâve loaded the slice into the latest image - then Iâve done âmergeâ > (Iâm still not clear on whether I should do merge or load? I think I > understand that I need merge to just get those fixes?). > > Having retested my bug, and found that it has been fixed - I entered a > comment saying which image version I tested it in, but then Iâm not sure > what I should do with the status? > > Can someone just clarify that for me? > > Tim > Just wait:) someone from the integrator team will include this change. It depends on the current work for other issues that has to be done, free time and the issue priority.

July 22, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo launcher network error for Pharo 4.0 (beta)?

by Tim Mackinnon

Yes its weird - I can view http://files.pharo.org/image/40/ fine in a web browser. It seems to affect 4.0 and 2.0. 3.0 and RModJenkins etc all expand correctly. The status bar was saying 4 network errors (although checking now, it says 7). It could be connectivity in this office, so I can check it from home - but it seems weird that some work and others don't. Tim -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-launcher-network-error-for-Pharo-4-0-beta-tp476… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

July 22, 2014

What should I do when I get a fogbugz "Fix review needed"?

by Tim Mackinnon

If I report a bug in fogbugz and it later gets fixed, I get an email with the slice its fixed in. So Iâve loaded the slice into the latest image - then Iâve done âmergeâ (Iâm still not clear on whether I should do merge or load? I think I understand that I need merge to just get those fixes?). Having retested my bug, and found that it has been fixed - I entered a comment saying which image version I tested it in, but then Iâm not sure what I should do with the status? Can someone just clarify that for me? Tim

July 22, 2014