- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] StandardWindow and SystemWindow

by laurent laffont

StandardWindow is part of Polymorph (so you have all Polymorph helpers defined in TEasilyThemed). You may want to use SystemWindow if you want to distribute a smaller image (Polymorph unloaded) or don't use/like Polymorph. BTW the tutorial is inconsistent, I will change it to use StandardWindow everywhere. Laurent. On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:13 AM, DougEdmunds <dougedmunds(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm looking at the tutorial on GUIs at: > > > http://book.pharo-project.org/book/GUI/PolymorphTutorial/Layout/?_s=J-fOIjG… > > The examples sometimes use StandardWindow and other times SystemWindow. > > When and why should I use SystemWindow? > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/StandardWindow-and-SystemWindow-tp3318409p3318409.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

Feb. 22, 2011

StandardWindow and SystemWindow

by DougEdmunds

I'm looking at the tutorial on GUIs at: http://book.pharo-project.org/book/GUI/PolymorphTutorial/Layout/?_s=J-fOIjG… The examples sometimes use StandardWindow and other times SystemWindow. When and why should I use SystemWindow? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/StandardWindow-and-SystemWindow-tp3318409p3318409.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Feb. 22, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-project] Call for Pharo Support **important**

by GermÃ¡n Arduino

Count me in also. GermÃ¡n. 2011/2/19 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > > On Feb 19, 2011, at 5:35 AM, Krishsmalltalk wrote: > >> Count me in. > > Excellent! > >> What is the formality in sign n dispatch of the letter > > just sign it and scanned/fax it to me. > > >> >> Sudhakar krishnamachari >> >> Extn 91-40403012 >> Cell 9902104814 >> >> >> >> On Feb 18, 2011, at 1:43 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> >>> Hi davorin >>> It says that you would consider paying a membership if this one is ok for you but that the membership >>> would have to be clear. So this is just a letter of support. Your are not tying yourself. >>> We will decide together the model because we should like that everybody can contribute. >>> >>> Now for us this is an important tool because we can seize the community to see if we could collect >>> money to pay an engineer like igor full-time, half time.... >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> >>>> I am not expert in legalize, does signing of this letter imply some >>>> financial commitment on part of the signer, or it is just "Pharo is >>>> great and we would like to use it" kind of letter? >>>> >>>> Many thanks! >>>> >>>> Davorin Rusevljan >>>> http://www.cloud208.com/ >>> >>> >> > > >

Feb. 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-project] [ANN] pharo focused sprint - bern, feb 26

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We would like to organize a Pharo Sprint on Saturday, February 26 at SCG, > University of Berne, Switzerland (room 107): > http://scg.unibe.ch/contact/maps > > Unlike other sprints, this would not be about fixing things from the > tracker, but about building something new and reviewing the situation around > one central topic. For this one, the main topic will be Morphic and the IDE. > Why? Because it is time to rethink our day-to-day tools and bring them > closer to this century (ok, maybe decade :)). It is Ok if you are not a > specialist. It is more important to want to participate and learn. The rest > will come in time. > > ***** Please let us know by mail if you plan to attend and what you would > wish to work on (see below). > > Proposed tasks (other tasks are possible in the same area): > - Enhancements of Morphic widgets: > --- TabGroupMorph with lazy pages, closable tabs, overflow handling and > toolbars (a start exists in Glamour) > --- High level support for collapsable panes (based on the input of Gary) > --- SearchMorph with multiple groups of items (like in Spotlight) > --- MorphTreeMorph integrated with GeneralScrollPane to allow for space > filling > --- BreadcrumbMorph > --- Hyperlinks in TextMorphs > - Test and enhance the current IDE > - Evaluate TextMorphs: NewTextMorph, PluggableTextMorph, > SMxPluggableTextMorph etc > - Prototype a new ToolSet solution > - Enhancements of Glamour and of the Glamorous Toolkit > --- Debugger > --- Coder > --- Multipage Workspace > --- CodeBubbles > - Develop WeakAnnouncement (start from the implementation of Lukas) > - Evaluate the various keybinding implementations > - Evaluate ToolBuilder > - Evaluate the path to adopt SimpleMorphic > > A second working topic is getting Monticello faster, but this will only be > tackled if there are enough people for the first one. > > Cheers, > Adrian and Doru > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get." > > > > >

Feb. 21, 2011

plot

by Werner Kassens

hi, what can i use to plot a collection of numbers? werner

Feb. 21, 2011

[ANN] Moose 4.3

by Tudor Girba

We are happy to announce the Moose Suite version 4.3: *http://moosetechnology.org/download* What is new: - New look and feel - New and flexible API to browse FAMIX models - Extensible Moose Finder - Enhanced Glamour engine to deal with complex actions - Enhanced FAMIX support for Java systems - Enhanced Glamour rendering for Morphic - Enhanced meta browser - Enhanced documentation of Mondrian - Enhanced XMLSupport - Enhanced Smalltalk importer A list of issues addressed in this release can be found at: *http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/list?can=1&q=status=Fixed%20milestone=4.3* Have fun, The Moose Team

Feb. 20, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-project] Call for Pharo Support **important**

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Feb 19, 2011, at 5:35 AM, Krishsmalltalk wrote: > Count me in. Excellent! > What is the formality in sign n dispatch of the letter just sign it and scanned/fax it to me. > > Sudhakar krishnamachari > > Extn 91-40403012 > Cell 9902104814 > > > > On Feb 18, 2011, at 1:43 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> Hi davorin >> It says that you would consider paying a membership if this one is ok for you but that the membership >> would have to be clear. So this is just a letter of support. Your are not tying yourself. >> We will decide together the model because we should like that everybody can contribute. >> >> Now for us this is an important tool because we can seize the community to see if we could collect >> money to pay an engineer like igor full-time, half time.... >> >> Stef >> >> >>> I am not expert in legalize, does signing of this letter imply some >>> financial commitment on part of the signer, or it is just "Pharo is >>> great and we would like to use it" kind of letter? >>> >>> Many thanks! >>> >>> Davorin Rusevljan >>> http://www.cloud208.com/ >> >> >

Feb. 19, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-project] Call for Pharo Support **important**

by Krishsmalltalk

Count me in. What is the formality in sign n dispatch of the letter Sudhakar krishnamachari Extn 91-40403012 Cell 9902104814 On Feb 18, 2011, at 1:43 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Hi davorin > It says that you would consider paying a membership if this one is ok for you but that the membership > would have to be clear. So this is just a letter of support. Your are not tying yourself. > We will decide together the model because we should like that everybody can contribute. > > Now for us this is an important tool because we can seize the community to see if we could collect > money to pay an engineer like igor full-time, half time.... > > Stef > > >> I am not expert in legalize, does signing of this letter imply some >> financial commitment on part of the signer, or it is just "Pharo is >> great and we would like to use it" kind of letter? >> >> Many thanks! >> >> Davorin Rusevljan >> http://www.cloud208.com/ > >

Feb. 19, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Removing Package from SqueakSource Project

by Runar Jordahl

Thanks a lot! Runar > No, you should first log in into your project, go to Versions, click on a version to get the detailed view, then you should have in the left Actions menu: Delete Version, and Delete Package (all versions of the package)

Feb. 18, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Removing Package from SqueakSource Project

by Simon Denier

On 18 fÃ©vr. 2011, at 20:22, Runar Jordahl wrote: > I have a (private) SqueakSource project where I want to remove a > package. I changed my package names, and leaving the old package will > probably only confuse users. > > I am unable to find a way to remove packages in the SqueakSource > project. There is the possibility to delete the project, and recreate > it under the same name, then publish the correct packages. Is this my > only option? No, you should first log in into your project, go to Versions, click on a version to get the detailed view, then you should have in the left Actions menu: Delete Version, and Delete Package (all versions of the package) > > (I use Metacello so I know I can create configurations to ease the > understanding of the project's contents. But I still want to remove > packages...) > > Kind regards > Runar > -- Simon Denier

Feb. 18, 2011