- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Help with TreeListMorph

by Adrien BARREAU

I'll take a look. Thanks ;) Adrien. From: benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo(a)gmail.com Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:12:06 +0200 To: pharo-users(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Help with TreeListMorph I think you should take a look at expand:to: and siblings in SimpleHierarchicalList ( the TreeListMorph's superclass) I think it's around :) Ben On Apr 11, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Adrien BARREAU wrote:Hi, I'm taking a look at the FileDialogWindow: FileDialogWindow new open. On the left, there is a tree. With the halo, I know it is a TreeListMorph. Here is my question: How can I know what is happening when I click on one of the little arrows which are just on the left of a directory name? With my changes, the subtree is very slow to be displayed and I don't understand what is called. Adrien.

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Help with TreeListMorph

by Benjamin

I think you should take a look at expand:to: and siblings in SimpleHierarchicalList ( the TreeListMorph's superclass) I think it's around :) Ben On Apr 11, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Adrien BARREAU wrote: > Hi, > > I'm taking a look at the FileDialogWindow: > FileDialogWindow new open. > > On the left, there is a tree. With the halo, I know it is a TreeListMorph. > Here is my question: > > How can I know what is happening when I click on one of the little arrows which are just on the left of a directory name? With my changes, the subtree is very slow to be displayed and I don't understand what is called. > > Adrien.

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Code Navigation: Navigation History in System Browser?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

excellent! Nick did you sign the license agreement. Stef On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Nick Chen wrote: > > StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> >>>> >>> Thanks Stef and Ben. I did get it to work with the latest Pharo-1.3 core. >>> It >>> has >>> a clean interface that I look forward to using it when it becomes >>> official. >>> >>> I am not familiar enough with the Pharo Core -> Pharo Dev process so I >>> was >>> not able to get the Mercury Panel (if it works in Nautilus), the >>> refactoring >>> tools and navigation history to work. >> >> it does not. >> Ben will add refactoring support soon (matter of menus), navigation and >> search. >> > > OK. I'll keep an eye on Nautilus. It is always nice to see changes being > made to > the browser to make it more the UI more functional and up-to-date. > > > >>> Actually, the project that I'm currently on also makes uses of some of >>> the >>> underlying components in Pharo-1.2 like Morphs and Editors so I can't >>> really >>> use the bleeding edge in Pharo-1.3. But I would like to use it soon. So >>> some >>> questions for you as core developers: >>> >>> 1) Do you have a API for Pharo-1.2? I know that you can do WorldMenu > >>> Help >>> and browse to Pharo > API Reference but there is nothing official there >>> stating that those are the "official" APIs. >> >> not that I know :) >> >>> 2) When do you expect to have an API freeze for Pharo-1.3? That way I can >>> start porting what we to make sure that it works. >> >> 1.3 is stable, really stable. >> > > I'll post on the mailing list if I have specific questions about the > components > that I'm using. > > > >>> Anyway back to O2. I'm in the process of getting the O2 packages to work. >>> I've >>> gotten them to load for the most part and from my own use they seem to >>> work. >>> I'll try to make the remaining failing/error tests pass and then post my >>> initial changes. I already know that some things don't work like >>> undo/redo but I (or >>> someone else) can fix those later. >> >> I would not invest on O2. This is the past and it bends too much OB so >> have a >> look at nautilus the groups are working much better. >> >> Stef >> >> > > Agreed. I've invested just a few hours already so I decided to just finish > it > up. I've made the proposed fix available at > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3992. Perhaps some other > people > might find it useful. Perhaps not, but that's OK too. :-) > > -- > Nick > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Code-Navigation-Navigation-History-in-System-Browser-… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Code Navigation: Navigation History in System Browser?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Apr 11, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Apr 11, 2011, at 10:49 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> 2) When do you expect to have an API freeze for Pharo-1.3? That way I can >>>>> start porting what we to make sure that it works. >>>> >>>> 1.3 is stable, really stable. >>> >>> >>> Quick question, what are the major changes planned for 1.3 and what is the (dreamed of/ideal/...) release plan? The website does not say anything ... >> >> we were planning for >> - FileSystem but not sure it will be there may be loaded but not integrated >> - Rpackage but I need to take some time to concentrate for real >> - new browser but it depends on RPackage >> - Opal but there are still missing parts. > > So I wonder if we don't do a quick 1.3 release with out Rpackage and Opal. Form my side Opal definitly should not be in the critical path of the > 1.3 release, if we talk about a quick release soon. yes this was my impression too. > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > >

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-project] Metacello chapter

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

If you have english mistake please send them. On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Pat Maddox wrote: > On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:49 AM, Davorin Rusevljan wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:58 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guys >>>> >>>> here is a new version of the metacello chapter. >>>> So we wrote it, rewrote it, rerewrote it. >>>> Now if this is of interest for you you can read it. >>>> >>>> But if you don't it means that I'm losing my time and I should stop >>>> writing and like >>>> that you can cry that there is no doc about Pharo. >> >> Stef thanks! It has cleared quite a few things in my head. > > Same here. The "Development Cycle Walk Through" section is particularly helpful. I haven't typed the code in, but reading through it I feel ready to tackle a Metacello config on my projects. Thank you for documenting this important tool. > > Pat

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Code Navigation: Navigation History in System Browser?

by Nick Chen

StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >>> >> Thanks Stef and Ben. I did get it to work with the latest Pharo-1.3 core. >> It >> has >> a clean interface that I look forward to using it when it becomes >> official. >> >> I am not familiar enough with the Pharo Core -> Pharo Dev process so I >> was >> not able to get the Mercury Panel (if it works in Nautilus), the >> refactoring >> tools and navigation history to work. > > it does not. > Ben will add refactoring support soon (matter of menus), navigation and > search. > OK. I'll keep an eye on Nautilus. It is always nice to see changes being made to the browser to make it more the UI more functional and up-to-date. >> Actually, the project that I'm currently on also makes uses of some of >> the >> underlying components in Pharo-1.2 like Morphs and Editors so I can't >> really >> use the bleeding edge in Pharo-1.3. But I would like to use it soon. So >> some >> questions for you as core developers: >> >> 1) Do you have a API for Pharo-1.2? I know that you can do WorldMenu > >> Help >> and browse to Pharo > API Reference but there is nothing official there >> stating that those are the "official" APIs. > > not that I know :) > >> 2) When do you expect to have an API freeze for Pharo-1.3? That way I can >> start porting what we to make sure that it works. > > 1.3 is stable, really stable. > I'll post on the mailing list if I have specific questions about the components that I'm using. >> Anyway back to O2. I'm in the process of getting the O2 packages to work. >> I've >> gotten them to load for the most part and from my own use they seem to >> work. >> I'll try to make the remaining failing/error tests pass and then post my >> initial changes. I already know that some things don't work like >> undo/redo but I (or >> someone else) can fix those later. > > I would not invest on O2. This is the past and it bends too much OB so > have a > look at nautilus the groups are working much better. > > Stef > > Agreed. I've invested just a few hours already so I decided to just finish it up. I've made the proposed fix available at http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3992. Perhaps some other people might find it useful. Perhaps not, but that's OK too. :-) -- Nick -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Code-Navigation-Navigation-History-in-System-Browser-… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 12, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Code Navigation: Navigation History in System Browser?

by Johan Fabry

On 11 Apr 2011, at 15:57, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> 2) When do you expect to have an API freeze for Pharo-1.3? That way I can >> start porting what we to make sure that it works. > > 1.3 is stable, really stable. Quick question, what are the major changes planned for 1.3 and what is the (dreamed of/ideal/...) release plan? The website does not say anything ... -- Johan Fabry jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile

April 11, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-project] Metacello chapter

by Pat Maddox

On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:49 AM, Davorin Rusevljan wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:58 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys >>> >>> here is a new version of the metacello chapter. >>> So we wrote it, rewrote it, rerewrote it. >>> Now if this is of interest for you you can read it. >>> >>> But if you don't it means that I'm losing my time and I should stop >>> writing and like >>> that you can cry that there is no doc about Pharo. > > Stef thanks! It has cleared quite a few things in my head. Same here. The "Development Cycle Walk Through" section is particularly helpful. I haven't typed the code in, but reading through it I feel ready to tackle a Metacello config on my projects. Thank you for documenting this important tool. Pat

April 11, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Code Navigation: Navigation History in System Browser?

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 11, 2011, at 10:49 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> >>>> 2) When do you expect to have an API freeze for Pharo-1.3? That way I can >>>> start porting what we to make sure that it works. >>> >>> 1.3 is stable, really stable. >> >> >> Quick question, what are the major changes planned for 1.3 and what is the (dreamed of/ideal/...) release plan? The website does not say anything ... > > we were planning for > - FileSystem but not sure it will be there may be loaded but not integrated > - Rpackage but I need to take some time to concentrate for real > - new browser but it depends on RPackage > - Opal but there are still missing parts. So I wonder if we don't do a quick 1.3 release with out Rpackage and Opal. Form my side Opal definitly should not be in the critical path of the 1.3 release, if we talk about a quick release soon. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 11, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Code Navigation: Navigation History in System Browser?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> >>> 2) When do you expect to have an API freeze for Pharo-1.3? That way I can >>> start porting what we to make sure that it works. >> >> 1.3 is stable, really stable. > > > Quick question, what are the major changes planned for 1.3 and what is the (dreamed of/ideal/...) release plan? The website does not say anything ... we were planning for - FileSystem but not sure it will be there may be loaded but not integrated - Rpackage but I need to take some time to concentrate for real - new browser but it depends on RPackage - Opal but there are still missing parts. - better announcements. Lot of little but important fixes Stef

April 11, 2011