- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Change an existing method from another project

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:30 AM, laurent laffont wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Miguel Moquillon <miguel.moquillon(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Le 13/06/2011 17:57, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : > > > On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Miguel Moquillon wrote: > > Ok, > > I will extend SUnit to integrate my extensions. > (It is unfortunate because there is just only one or two methods to change.) > > so be ready that your code will not work when the next version of Sunit show up. > I really think that this is better to fork one version where we can do what we want. > Thus I have two possible solutions: > - provide a direct contribution to the SUnit project with my code, > - or fork SUnit to a new project (PharoUnit?) so that anybody can enhance the unit test framework for Pharo. > > In fact, I don't know if the Pragma implementation in Pharo is specific to the Squeak/Pharo smalltalk dialect. In that case, I think it would be better to fork SUnit as my changes will be based upon pragmas. > > > Indeed http://squeaksource.com/SUnit is global Read / Write, creator/admin = Marcus Denker, so I suppose you can submit a package/branch in this repo safely. > But keep in mind that the SUnit from Pharo is not regularly saved there... maybe it should? But than, without automatisation this is too much work. -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

June 14, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Change an existing method from another project

by laurent laffont

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Miguel Moquillon < miguel.moquillon(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Le 13/06/2011 17:57, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : > > >> On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Miguel Moquillon wrote: >> >> Ok, >>> >>> I will extend SUnit to integrate my extensions. >>> (It is unfortunate because there is just only one or two methods to >>> change.) >>> >> >> so be ready that your code will not work when the next version of Sunit >> show up. >> I really think that this is better to fork one version where we can do >> what we want. >> > Thus I have two possible solutions: > - provide a direct contribution to the SUnit project with my code, > - or fork SUnit to a new project (PharoUnit?) so that anybody can enhance > the unit test framework for Pharo. > > In fact, I don't know if the Pragma implementation in Pharo is specific to > the Squeak/Pharo smalltalk dialect. In that case, I think it would be better > to fork SUnit as my changes will be based upon pragmas. > > Indeed http://squeaksource.com/SUnit is global Read / Write, creator/admin = Marcus Denker, so I suppose you can submit a package/branch in this repo safely. Laurent > Mig > >

June 14, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Change an existing method from another project

by Miguel Moquillon

Le 13/06/2011 17:57, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : > > On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Miguel Moquillon wrote: > >> Ok, >> >> I will extend SUnit to integrate my extensions. >> (It is unfortunate because there is just only one or two methods to change.) > > so be ready that your code will not work when the next version of Sunit show up. > I really think that this is better to fork one version where we can do what we want. Thus I have two possible solutions: - provide a direct contribution to the SUnit project with my code, - or fork SUnit to a new project (PharoUnit?) so that anybody can enhance the unit test framework for Pharo. In fact, I don't know if the Pragma implementation in Pharo is specific to the Squeak/Pharo smalltalk dialect. In that case, I think it would be better to fork SUnit as my changes will be based upon pragmas. Mig

June 14, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Change an existing method from another project

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Miguel Moquillon wrote: > Ok, > > I will extend SUnit to integrate my extensions. > (It is unfortunate because there is just only one or two methods to change.) so be ready that your code will not work when the next version of Sunit show up. I really think that this is better to fork one version where we can do what we want. Stef > > Le 11/06/2011 19:17, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : >> Miguel >> >> please do the following: >> - Fork and copy and past SUnit and extend it >> - In the past I modified SUnit and after people complained that it was not the right version and my extensions got >> lost when we reloaded the latest version of SUnit. >> So let us invent some new way to write tests :). >> >> Stef >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm going to provide a new way to write unit tests without having prefixed test methods with the word 'test'. As I don't want to write another unit test framework, I need to change some methods of SUnit (as well of Autotest). >>> Is there any way to do that from an external project without creating a specific fork of theses projects? >>> >>> Mig >>> >> >> > >

June 13, 2011

Job offer in Luxembourg

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi guys There is a job offer in Luxembourg. Please contact hayley directly. I hope that this will help you. Position: C++ Developer with Smalltalk Term: 3 Months extendable Location: Luxembourg Rate: Negotiable C++ Smalltalk Developer my client a leading banking institution is looking for a C++ Smalltalk Developer with good knowledge of SQL. You will be asked to help develop the technical design, coding, unit testing for a number of projects within the bank. This will be a long term contract. Stef

June 13, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Change an existing method from another project

by laurent laffont

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Miguel Moquillon < miguel.moquillon(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, > > I will extend SUnit to integrate my extensions. > (It is unfortunate because there is just only one or two methods to > change.) > Or just open an issue and publish a slice. Laurent. > > Le 11/06/2011 19:17, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : > > Miguel >> >> please do the following: >> - Fork and copy and past SUnit and extend it >> - In the past I modified SUnit and after people complained that it >> was not the right version and my extensions got >> lost when we reloaded the latest version of SUnit. >> So let us invent some new way to write tests :). >> >> Stef >> >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I'm going to provide a new way to write unit tests without having >>> prefixed test methods with the word 'test'. As I don't want to write another >>> unit test framework, I need to change some methods of SUnit (as well of >>> Autotest). >>> Is there any way to do that from an external project without creating a >>> specific fork of theses projects? >>> >>> Mig >>> >>> >> >> > >

June 13, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Change an existing method from another project

by Miguel Moquillon

Ok, I will extend SUnit to integrate my extensions. (It is unfortunate because there is just only one or two methods to change.) Le 11/06/2011 19:17, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : > Miguel > > please do the following: > - Fork and copy and past SUnit and extend it > - In the past I modified SUnit and after people complained that it was not the right version and my extensions got > lost when we reloaded the latest version of SUnit. > So let us invent some new way to write tests :). > > Stef > > >> Hi, >> >> I'm going to provide a new way to write unit tests without having prefixed test methods with the word 'test'. As I don't want to write another unit test framework, I need to change some methods of SUnit (as well of Autotest). >> Is there any way to do that from an external project without creating a specific fork of theses projects? >> >> Mig >> > >

June 13, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Change an existing method from another project

by Miguel Moquillon

Yes. You're right ;-) it will be based on pragmas Mig Le 11 juin 2011 Ã 20:23, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont(a)gmail.com> a Ã©crit : On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Miguel Moquillon < miguel.moquillon(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to provide a new way to write unit tests without having prefixed > test methods with the word 'test'. As I don't want to write another unit > test framework, I need to change some methods of SUnit (as well of > Autotest). > Cool Miguel ! Will you use a pragma like <test> <before> <after> ? I want it :) For Autotest don't hesitate to commit directly in Autotest repository. Laurent > Is there any way to do that from an external project without creating a > specific fork of theses projects? > Mig > >

June 13, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Tiling Window Manager - status update

by laurent laffont

> > >> Creating a nice Metacello Configuration for TWM will be appreciated :) >> > > ConfigurationOfTilingWindowManager is in squeaksource/TilingWindowManager > ;) > Thank you !! On this side next steps are: - support for KeyMapping 1.8 - split TWM in TWM-Core / TWM-Tests / .... Laurent. > > Cheers, > Guille > > >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Laurent Laffont - @lolgzs <http://twitter.com/#%21/lolgzs> >> >> Pharo Smalltalk Screencasts: http://www.pharocasts.com/ >> Blog: http://magaloma.blogspot.com/ >> Developer group: http://cara74.seasidehosting.st >> >> >

June 13, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Fedora 15_64

by Alan Rodas

I take this opportunity to also explain how to add 32 bit libraries for 64 bit ubuntu (in debian if I remember correctly should be the same) for future reference. Open a console Type the following: sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install ia32-libs You should be prompted to enter your password, type it and hit enter. After the install finishes you should be able to run Pharo. Maybe a note or warning should be put in the download section of the website to address this problem to newcomers.Something like "running linux on a amd64 architecture, read some_section_on_how_to_install_libraries" Cheers -- Alan Rodas Bonjour

June 12, 2011