- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by Camillo Bruni

On 2012-10-01, at 15:06, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> Should Pharo run with the squeak-vm? An ARM build for the squeak-vm exists... >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Marc >>> >> >> Yes, Pharo should run on any recent squeak-vm. If it crashes, it's a VM bug. > > I'm not sure. :) > We fixed a lot of code in the filePlugin and friends. most of it is backwards compatible, meaning that unless you explicitly rely on the new filePlugin features it won't fail. And in the worst case you should get a warning, but certainly not a crash ;)

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> Should Pharo run with the squeak-vm? An ARM build for the squeak-vm exists... >> >> Thank you, >> Marc >> > > Yes, Pharo should run on any recent squeak-vm. If it crashes, it's a VM bug. I'm not sure. :) We fixed a lot of code in the filePlugin and friends. Stef

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by David T. Lewis

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:53:44PM +0200, Marc Hanisch wrote: > Should Pharo run with the squeak-vm? An ARM build for the squeak-vm exists... > > Thank you, > Marc > Yes, Pharo should run on any recent squeak-vm. If it crashes, it's a VM bug. Dave > 2012/10/1 St??phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > > So far there is no JIT for ARM. > > > > Stef > >

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by Marc Hanisch

Should Pharo run with the squeak-vm? An ARM build for the squeak-vm exists... Thank you, Marc 2012/10/1 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > So far there is no JIT for ARM. > > Stef >

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by Denis Kudriashov

What about StackVM? 2012/10/1 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > So far there is no JIT for ARM. > > Stef > > On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Marc Hanisch wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm running Ubuntu ARM (armhf) on my Toshiba AC100. With the help of > apt-get > > I've installed the squeak-vm and the squeak-image, which both run fine. > > > > Now I've downloaded the Pharo-image, but could not find the cog-vm for > ARM. > > Running the Pharo-image with the squeak-vm just gives me a segmentation > > fault: > > > > -1550458048 [] in ByteSymbol>? > > /usr/bin/squeak: line 277: 4603 Segmentation fault (core dumped) > $VM > > > > I don't know if it is in general possible to run the image with the > > squeak-vm. Does an ARM-build for the cog-vm exists? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Marc > > > > >

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

So far there is no JIT for ARM. Stef On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Marc Hanisch wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running Ubuntu ARM (armhf) on my Toshiba AC100. With the help of apt-get > I've installed the squeak-vm and the squeak-image, which both run fine. > > Now I've downloaded the Pharo-image, but could not find the cog-vm for ARM. > Running the Pharo-image with the squeak-vm just gives me a segmentation > fault: > > -1550458048 [] in ByteSymbol>? > /usr/bin/squeak: line 277: 4603 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $VM > > I don't know if it is in general possible to run the image with the > squeak-vm. Does an ARM-build for the cog-vm exists? > > Thanks in advance, > Marc >

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] SHA256 hashing with secret key..

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

to me it shows that the package crypto should be improved. So publish a new version with the helper methods once you get the right way of making it work. We are all newbies in a domain or another one and I want a system for newbies (with documentation, nice comment, API, testsâ¦.). Stef On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:35 AM, sergio_101 wrote: >> hmacSHA256: aString key: aKey >> ^ (SHA256 new hmac) >> key: aKey asByteArray; >> digestMessage: aString asByteArray > > perfect! this is getting me closer.. i still have my test failing, but > now, i think it's another area that has problems.. > > looking at this, i SHOULD have been able to write it in just a few > seconds.. i have all the pieces.. > > but looking into it, i just dont understand what is going on line 2.. > > now that i look at it, and run up the chain in the browser, it's > pretty obvious what is going my .. > > my concern is that i had to figure it out AFTER someone gave me the solution.. > > am i gonna get better at this, once i monkey with the browser alot > more, or am i just being slow on he draw? > > thanks! > > > -- > ---- > peace, > sergio > photographer, journalist, visionary > > http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com > http://www.CodingForHire.com > http://www.coffee-black.com > http://www.painlessfrugality.com > http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 > http://www.facebook.com/sergio101 >

Oct. 1, 2012

Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by Marc Hanisch

Hello, I'm running Ubuntu ARM (armhf) on my Toshiba AC100. With the help of apt-get I've installed the squeak-vm and the squeak-image, which both run fine. Now I've downloaded the Pharo-image, but could not find the cog-vm for ARM. Running the Pharo-image with the squeak-vm just gives me a segmentation fault: -1550458048 [] in ByteSymbol>? /usr/bin/squeak: line 277: 4603 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $VM I don't know if it is in general possible to run the image with the squeak-vm. Does an ARM-build for the cog-vm exists? Thanks in advance, Marc

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] CogVM version

by Francois Stephany

Thanks ! On 30/09/12 21:00, Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 1 October 2012 04:50, Francois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> I've downloaded the Cog-mac.zip from: >> http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/unstable-2-0 >> >> How can I find out the version/revision number? It would be cool to have the >> number in the file name. >> > Smalltalk vm version. > > We also soon add the jenkins build number to version info. > >

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] SHA256 hashing with secret key..

by sergio_101

> hmacSHA256: aString key: aKey > ^ (SHA256 new hmac) > key: aKey asByteArray; > digestMessage: aString asByteArray perfect! this is getting me closer.. i still have my test failing, but now, i think it's another area that has problems.. looking at this, i SHOULD have been able to write it in just a few seconds.. i have all the pieces.. but looking into it, i just dont understand what is going on line 2.. now that i look at it, and run up the chain in the browser, it's pretty obvious what is going my .. my concern is that i had to figure it out AFTER someone gave me the solution.. am i gonna get better at this, once i monkey with the browser alot more, or am i just being slow on he draw? thanks! -- ---- peace, sergio photographer, journalist, visionary http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com http://www.CodingForHire.com http://www.coffee-black.com http://www.painlessfrugality.com http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 http://www.facebook.com/sergio101

Oct. 1, 2012