- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] DateAndTime>>asTime

by JosÃ© ComesaÃ±a

Hello everybody. I would like to add a new improvement to this thread. I have noticed that Date class has a bug, or at least something to improve in readFrom:pattern: method. The initial comment states that "A year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000.". But this seems to be incorrect: if you evaluate Date readFrom: '07/06/13' readStream pattern: 'd/m/y' you get: 7 June 0013 instead of 7 June 2013. I am working with version #20605 Thank you all for your great work. Regards. 2013/6/6 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> > can you save an image with the inspector opened on both x and y, x asTime > and y asTime > and provide a link to it? like that I can inspect it in all detail... > > On 2013-06-06, at 17:51, dmacq <dmacq(a)instantiations.com> wrote: > > > I tried it again this morning and still had the problem. > > > > This is interesting. > > > > | x y | > > x := DateAndTime year: 1991 day: 196 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > y := DateAndTime year: 1991 month: 7 day: 15 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: > 7. > > x = y <------------------ True > > > > But > > | x y | > > x := DateAndTime year: 1991 day: 196 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > y := DateAndTime year: 1991 month: 7 day: 15 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: > 7. > > x asTime = y asTime <------------- False > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/DateAndTime-asTime-tp4691870p4691988.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > >

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] account search

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 07 Jun 2013, at 11:42, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > who is remove(a)me.com on fogbugz? I don't know, but I am pretty sure you can safely remove that account :-)

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Markus Fritsche

On 07.06.2013 11:27, Camillo Bruni wrote: > you can register on the penelope page. > avoid the dot in your gmail address (BTW: gmail ignores the dots anyway. you can put as many dots as you want and still receive mails). Ah, thanks - I think I used that form before with the dot. When should I consider myself being a monkey? Kind regards, Markus

June 7, 2013

account search

by Camillo Bruni

who is remove(a)me.com on fogbugz?

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2013-06-07, at 11:20, Markus Fritsche <fritsche.markus(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello Marcus & List, >> >> On 07.06.2013 10:44, Marcus Denker wrote: >>> Normally I thought that fogbugz should send you updates on bugs you reported? We need to check that. >> I got one mail with an URL that I could check for updates... >>> In this case, we have fixed in in 3.0 and 2.0 (the bug as a "Parent Case" for 2.0, >>> this was decided in the discussion and done). >>> We often fix things first in 3.0 to test and then fix it in 2.0 so we are sure the fix >>> works. >> Thank you for explaining. I admit it was late yesterday ;-) >>> So there are two problems: >>> >>> 1) the "RemoteString past end of file" on recent linux. >>> >>> 2) Something strange happens sometimes that reading the source fails. >>> >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7559/Plugins-Primitives-no-longer-work-af… >>> (it has a parent case for 2.0) >> Can you link to Penelope about the second issue? I'd like to help hunt these two since ubuntu-13.04 is my primary system on a few machines, big to small. > > you can register on the penelope page. > avoid the dot in your gmail address (BTW: gmail ignores the dots anyway. you can put as many dots as you want and still receive mails). We should add a bug tracker entry for that, too. Marcus

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Camillo Bruni

On 2013-06-07, at 11:20, Markus Fritsche <fritsche.markus(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Marcus & List, > > On 07.06.2013 10:44, Marcus Denker wrote: >> Normally I thought that fogbugz should send you updates on bugs you reported? We need to check that. > I got one mail with an URL that I could check for updates... >> In this case, we have fixed in in 3.0 and 2.0 (the bug as a "Parent Case" for 2.0, >> this was decided in the discussion and done). >> We often fix things first in 3.0 to test and then fix it in 2.0 so we are sure the fix >> works. > Thank you for explaining. I admit it was late yesterday ;-) >> So there are two problems: >> >> 1) the "RemoteString past end of file" on recent linux. >> >> 2) Something strange happens sometimes that reading the source fails. >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7559/Plugins-Primitives-no-longer-work-af… >> (it has a parent case for 2.0) > Can you link to Penelope about the second issue? I'd like to help hunt these two since ubuntu-13.04 is my primary system on a few machines, big to small. you can register on the penelope page. avoid the dot in your gmail address (BTW: gmail ignores the dots anyway. you can put as many dots as you want and still receive mails).

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Markus Fritsche <fritsche.markus(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7559/Plugins-Primitives-no-longer-work-af… >> (it has a parent case for 2.0) > Can you link to Penelope about the second issue? I'd like to help hunt these two since ubuntu-13.04 is my primary system on a few machines, big to small. Sadly not because of 10157 http://bugs.pharo.org is not in sync with FogBugz https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10157/http-bugs-pharo-org-is-not-in-sync-… >> FugBugz does not allow read access for anonymous users. We *really* don't like this >> but it can't be changed. That is why we added bugs.pharo.org where you can get an >> account immediately *and* view all issues > Penelope only lists active bugs? Normally that is the idea, yes. > As far as I see, it doesn't have a full text search - that would probably make things more simple. Yes, the problem is that man power is limited and even though we really really want all these things, the sad reality is that they are only done when they are done. I have not found any other solution than to do, one tiny trivial step at a time... Marcus

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Markus Fritsche

Hello Marcus & List, On 07.06.2013 10:44, Marcus Denker wrote: > Normally I thought that fogbugz should send you updates on bugs you > reported? We need to check that. I got one mail with an URL that I could check for updates... > In this case, we have fixed in in 3.0 and 2.0 (the bug as a "Parent Case" for 2.0, > this was decided in the discussion and done). > We often fix things first in 3.0 to test and then fix it in 2.0 so we are sure the fix > works. Thank you for explaining. I admit it was late yesterday ;-) > So there are two problems: > > 1) the "RemoteString past end of file" on recent linux. > > 2) Something strange happens sometimes that reading the source fails. > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7559/Plugins-Primitives-no-longer-work-af… > (it has a parent case for 2.0) Can you link to Penelope about the second issue? I'd like to help hunt these two since ubuntu-13.04 is my primary system on a few machines, big to small. > FugBugz does not allow read access for anonymous users. We *really* don't like this > but it can't be changed. That is why we added bugs.pharo.org where you can get an > account immediately *and* view all issues Penelope only lists active bugs? As far as I see, it doesn't have a full text search - that would probably make things more simple. > No, normally the idea is that people should report bug entires. Ok, thanks for clarification. I wasn't sure after poking around a bit. Kind regards, Markus

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 07 Jun 2013, at 11:07, Markus Fritsche <fritsche.markus(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Sven & List, > > On 07.06.2013 10:45, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> Yes, it is an important problem (but the trigger is a change in Ubuntu 13.04). I am not an Ubuntu desktop user, I can only hope that those who are will help. > Well, I have 13.04 on a few laptops (2GB Atom netbook, 8GB i7 dual core and 6GB AMD 4Core) with different file systems (ext4, btrfs) on them, so I have quite a few configurations at hand to test with. Great, we need more Linux Desktop users, the community it too Mac centric ;-) > The RemoteString-Error during updates has been fixed; as I see the files referenced by the download links have been replaced. The only "old" image left I found was the one titled "Pharo 2.0 image" on http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download which raises the error in ScriptLoaderupdate>>#20605 We need to fix that then. Thanks for the feedback. Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe Proudly supporting Pharo http://pharo.org http://association.pharo.org http://consortium.pharo.org

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Markus Fritsche

Hello Sven & List, On 07.06.2013 10:45, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Yes, it is an important problem (but the trigger is a change in Ubuntu 13.04). I am not an Ubuntu desktop user, I can only hope that those who are will help. Well, I have 13.04 on a few laptops (2GB Atom netbook, 8GB i7 dual core and 6GB AMD 4Core) with different file systems (ext4, btrfs) on them, so I have quite a few configurations at hand to test with. The RemoteString-Error during updates has been fixed; as I see the files referenced by the download links have been replaced. The only "old" image left I found was the one titled "Pharo 2.0 image" on http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download which raises the error in ScriptLoaderupdate>>#20605

June 7, 2013