- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [Pharo3] New Sources file starting 30841/30842

by Tyler Sperry

Ben, Just a quick reality check: Tonight I downloaded Pharo 3.0 from pharo-project.org and unzipped the files on a Windows 7 Starter netbook. Everything went fine: PharoV30.sources appeared instead of the old V20 version. Not that I expected otherwise, but I was curious and it never hurts to add another set of eyes. Perhaps this thread is moot now that 30845 is (momentarily) the latest build? Tyler -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo3-New-Sources-file-starting-30841-30842-tp475697… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 30, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Right-click and tutorial

by Ben Coman

April 30, 2014

Right-click and tutorial

by David Harris

I reported a problem with the mouse right-click under Windows 7Â last January and the 30845 update still exhibits the same behavior. Selected Pharo Tutorials from the World menu. Expanded Pharo Syntax Tutorial. Clicked Welcome. Highlighted 'PharoTutorial next.' Right-click of mouse does nothing. Fortunately, Alt-D does perform the do-it action. Once the new tutorial window opens, then right-click works as advertised. It is just that first panel where it is non-functional. Unfortunately, that panel tells the user "right-click and choose 'do it (d)'"Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

April 30, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] "stepping" a non-morphic object

by Ben Coman

April 30, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] "stepping" a non-morphic object

by Sean P. DeNigris

Igor Stasenko wrote > except that you then will be also responsible for managing forked process Yes, I left that out for simplicity, but I recall painfully how complex it can be to make sure everything gets GC-ed (http://forum.world.st/Terminating-a-Process-when-an-object-dies-td4683036.h…) ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/stepping-a-non-morphic-object-tp4756998p4757152.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 30, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] "stepping" a non-morphic object

by Igor Stasenko

On 29 April 2014 18:41, Sean P. DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > Chris Wright wrote > > What is the best way to get the step message sent to non-morphs - or is > > there a better way in Pharo > > I'm not sure I understand exactly, but if you want to do it via Morphic > stepping, you could implement e.g. ModelTickingMorph which is invisible and > has no extent, and steps your model in it's #step. > > or you could use a process: > [ [ myModelObject step. 1 second asDelay wait ] repeat ] fork. > > except that you then will be also responsible for managing forked process by implementing it.. else it will loop forever, your object will never be GCed, consume CPU & waste memory :) oh.. and each time you test it once more, it will readily spawn another process with same characteristics :) > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/stepping-a-non-morphic-object-tp4756998p4757081.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

April 30, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] NativeBoost

by Igor Stasenko

On 29 April 2014 22:51, Markus Fritsche <mfritsche(a)reauktion.de> wrote: > Hello Igor, > > > Also, i doubt it, but try change the alignment > > NativeBoostWin32>>stackAlignment > > to use 16 > > That did the trick - it was ^ 1 - changed it to ^ 16 and now the DoIt > opens an inspector on a TM1P object. > > This is weird.. Can you try one thing: change: NBFFICallout>>foreignCall: aBlock callInfo := self newCallInfo. callInfo alignment: 16. asm performingCall: callInfo in: aBlock. while use: NativeBoostWin32>>stackAlignment ^ 1 and then swap values. And tell which case works and which is not (they both may not work though). Don't forget to restart image before trying to reset all generated code. (you can also use #optNoAlignment option while calling external function e.g. self nbcall: blah options: #(+optNoAlignment). I wanna know, who corrupts stack: external function or VM itself. Should this be reported on fogbugz? > > Thank you > Markus > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

April 30, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [Pharo3] New Sources file starting 30841/30842

by Ben Coman

April 30, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [Pharo3] New Sources file starting 30841/30842

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

The thing is, my time is limited as well, and I just took 15 minutes to double-check that things work and to write an email to you. IMHO you should try the official way using the fresh download (like in the movie) and tell us whether that works or not and report back. For some reason, you seem to not want to do that, and then you say we don't want to help, strange... On 30 Apr 2014, at 00:36, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: > " Please understand that we cannot solve local problems." > > Duh. Like I have never stripped or built a Smalltalk image over my decades as a corp contracting Smalltalker ( so not Pharo, 'natch ) > > Marcus : the problem occurred ; I don't see it explained. > > So Marcus, if you are OK, I won't look further. I have a lot on my plate otherwise today already ...

April 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [Pharo3] New Sources file starting 30841/30842

by Robert Shiplett

" Please understand that we cannot solve local problems." Duh. Like I have never stripped or built a Smalltalk image over my decades as a corp contracting Smalltalker ( so not Pharo, 'natch ) Marcus : the problem occurred ; I don't see it explained. So Marcus, if you are OK, I won't look further. I have a lot on my plate otherwise today already ...

April 29, 2014