- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Sending transactional emails from Pharo

by Esteban A. Maringolo

Looks very nice. How do you send the mails? Do you have a helper class you're willing to share? :) Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2014-05-29 11:40 GMT-03:00 Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: > > Am 29.05.2014 um 15:10 schrieb Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com>: > > What is the simplest way we have in Pharo to send emails? > > We're going to send a bunch of "no-reply@mydomain" style mails > confirming transactions and similars. ~3000 mails. > > Anybody already doing this? > > Yes. Iâm using Mandrill > > http://mandrill.com/ > > It is the service for autmated mail from mail chimp. > > Norbert >

May 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Accessing DLLs in Smalltalk/V

by stepharo

For nativeBoost have a look at the tutorial to use NB to bind X11 https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/lastSucces… I'm sorry but if igor does not write documentation, it takes far too much energy from me to understand and write something. It would be so much better if people with the knowledge would write. Stef On 29/5/14 16:15, Bob Williams wrote: > > I found an old Smalltalk/V imagine from 2000 and tracked down how I > was able add calls to Windows DLLs and to add my own. It was in the > class DynamicLinkLibrary and its subclasses, e. g., a call to the > GDIDLL to draw a Bezier spline (which I believe I added) was: > > bezierTo: hDC lpPoints: anLPPOINT count: anInt > > <api: PolyBezierTo ulong struct ulong boolean> > > ^self invalidArgument > > I added by own DLL to do matrix transformations that was written in > ASSEMBLER to optimized the floating point processor pipelining (a > start operation every cycle while it took 3 cycles to complete) and it > performed about 15% better. > > I have not found anything similar in Pharo, but it must if external > libraries are used. NativeBoost seems to come close, but I cannot find > any documentation. Can someone point me to some documentation, code, > anything? It is greatly appreciated. > > bw >

May 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Sending transactional emails from Pharo

by Norbert Hartl

Am 29.05.2014 um 15:10 schrieb Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com>: > What is the simplest way we have in Pharo to send emails? > > We're going to send a bunch of "no-reply@mydomain" style mails > confirming transactions and similars. ~3000 mails. > > Anybody already doing this? > Yes. Iâm using Mandrill http://mandrill.com/ It is the service for autmated mail from mail chimp. Norbert

May 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Accessing DLLs in Smalltalk/V

by kilon alios

The PharoForTheEnterprise book has a chapter on Nativeboost. You can find the book here in pdf format https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/lastSucces… also you can click on the folder to download only the Nativeboost chapter, but I advice to download the whole book since it has tons of useful info. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Bob Williams <rwilliams19(a)cox.net> wrote: > I found an old Smalltalk/V imagine from 2000 and tracked down how I was > able add calls to Windows DLLs and to add my own. It was in the class > DynamicLinkLibrary and its subclasses, e. g., a call to the GDIDLL to draw > a Bezier spline (which I believe I added) was: > > bezierTo: hDC lpPoints: anLPPOINT count: anInt > > <api: PolyBezierTo ulong struct ulong boolean> > > ^self invalidArgument > > > > I added by own DLL to do matrix transformations that was written in > ASSEMBLER to optimized the floating point processor pipelining (a start > operation every cycle while it took 3 cycles to complete) and it performed > about 15% better. > > I have not found anything similar in Pharo, but it must if external > libraries are used. NativeBoost seems to come close, but I cannot find any > documentation. Can someone point me to some documentation, code, anything? > It is greatly appreciated. > > bw >

May 29, 2014

Accessing DLLs in Smalltalk/V

by Bob Williams

I found an old Smalltalk/V imagine from 2000 and tracked down how I was able add calls to Windows DLLs and to add my own. It was in the class DynamicLinkLibrary and its subclasses, e. g., a call to the GDIDLL to draw a Bezier spline (which I believe I added) was: bezierTo: hDC lpPoints: anLPPOINT count: anInt <api: PolyBezierTo ulong struct ulong boolean> ^self invalidArgument I added by own DLL to do matrix transformations that was written in ASSEMBLER to optimized the floating point processor pipelining (a start operation every cycle while it took 3 cycles to complete) and it performed about 15% better. I have not found anything similar in Pharo, but it must if external libraries are used. NativeBoost seems to come close, but I cannot find any documentation. Can someone point me to some documentation, code, anything? It is greatly appreciated. bw

May 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Sending transactional emails from Pharo

by Esteban A. Maringolo

Thank you guys, I'll give Postmark a try. I already defined the DKIM/SPF records in the DNS Zone. It's the first time I see such thing in a DNS table, I hope this works well... Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2014-05-29 11:06 GMT-03:00 Johan Fabry <jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl>: > > I used postmark as well some time ago, and it worked like a charm. In the mean time I switched to using the builtin smtp client, because itâs a very low amount of mails and I could use the departmentâs smtp server :-) > > On May 29, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> >> On 29 May 2014, at 15:10, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> What is the simplest way we have in Pharo to send emails? >>> >> >> For ESUG we are using Postmark: >> >> https://postmarkapp.com >> >> There is a library for Pharo that makes it very easy to use. >> >> http://tulipemoutarde.be/2011/12/29/send-email-from-pharo-with-postmark.html >> >> It works very very well. >> >>> We're going to send a bunch of "no-reply@mydomain" style mails >>> confirming transactions and similars. ~3000 mails. >>> >>> Anybody already doing this? >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Esteban A. Maringolo >>> >>> ps: This will be running in a DigitalOcean droplet, so I could install >>> an email server, but I don't think it is the simplest solution :) >>> >> No, it would be horrorâ¦ all the IPs of these machines are registered >> as potential spam sources. >> So you would need to use then the outbound SMTP server of DigitalOcean, >> if they have one. >> >> Sending email is harder than you think these daysâ¦ >> >> Marcus >> > > > > ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- > > Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry > PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile > >

May 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Sending transactional emails from Pharo

by Johan Fabry

I used postmark as well some time ago, and it worked like a charm. In the mean time I switched to using the builtin smtp client, because itâs a very low amount of mails and I could use the departmentâs smtp server :-) On May 29, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On 29 May 2014, at 15:10, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> What is the simplest way we have in Pharo to send emails? >> > > For ESUG we are using Postmark: > > https://postmarkapp.com > > There is a library for Pharo that makes it very easy to use. > > http://tulipemoutarde.be/2011/12/29/send-email-from-pharo-with-postmark.html > > It works very very well. > >> We're going to send a bunch of "no-reply@mydomain" style mails >> confirming transactions and similars. ~3000 mails. >> >> Anybody already doing this? >> >> Regards. >> >> Esteban A. Maringolo >> >> ps: This will be running in a DigitalOcean droplet, so I could install >> an email server, but I don't think it is the simplest solution :) >> > No, it would be horrorâ¦ all the IPs of these machines are registered > as potential spam sources. > So you would need to use then the outbound SMTP server of DigitalOcean, > if they have one. > > Sending email is harder than you think these daysâ¦ > > Marcus > ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile

May 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Sending transactional emails from Pharo

by Marcus Denker

On 29 May 2014, at 15:10, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > What is the simplest way we have in Pharo to send emails? > For ESUG we are using Postmark: https://postmarkapp.com There is a library for Pharo that makes it very easy to use. http://tulipemoutarde.be/2011/12/29/send-email-from-pharo-with-postmark.html It works very very well. > We're going to send a bunch of "no-reply@mydomain" style mails > confirming transactions and similars. ~3000 mails. > > Anybody already doing this? > > Regards. > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > ps: This will be running in a DigitalOcean droplet, so I could install > an email server, but I don't think it is the simplest solution :) > No, it would be horrorâ¦ all the IPs of these machines are registered as potential spam sources. So you would need to use then the outbound SMTP server of DigitalOcean, if they have one. Sending email is harder than you think these daysâ¦ Marcus

May 29, 2014

Sending transactional emails from Pharo

by Esteban A. Maringolo

What is the simplest way we have in Pharo to send emails? We're going to send a bunch of "no-reply@mydomain" style mails confirming transactions and similars. ~3000 mails. Anybody already doing this? Regards. Esteban A. Maringolo ps: This will be running in a DigitalOcean droplet, so I could install an email server, but I don't think it is the simplest solution :)

May 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] NeoJSON mapping of nil properties

by Esteban A. Maringolo

2014-05-28 16:03 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: > > Hi Esteban, > > Your wish is my command ;-) > > In #bleedingEdge you can now do: > > String streamContents: [ :stream | > (NeoJSONWriter on: stream) > writeNil: true; > mapAllInstVarsFor: Point; > nextPut: Point new. > > which will give you: > > {"x":null,"y":null} > > instead of: > > {} > > which remains the default. Thank you Sven! Esteban A. Maringolo

May 29, 2014