- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Aliaksei Syrel

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html It is almost impossible to do it like this in Pharo now because of low drawing performance and bad support of animations. Sad but true. Cheers, Alex

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] UI framework&design options

by Stephan Eggermont

That Maya Node Editor looks like a PasteUpMorph with Connectors to me. You'd might want to wrap them (Morphic) in a in a standard window with menu bar and toolbar from either Spec or Glamour for now. And then follow Bloc developments to move there. Stephan

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Mayuresh Kathe

On 2015-01-25 19:30, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > while i admire what the pharo team has done with it's user interface, > i believe it can be improved. > has google's "material design" been considered off-late? > do take a look at; http://www.google.com/design/ actually, a more precise 'url' would be as below; http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html

Jan. 25, 2015

pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Mayuresh Kathe

while i admire what the pharo team has done with it's user interface, i believe it can be improved. has google's "material design" been considered off-late? do take a look at; http://www.google.com/design/ ~mayuresh

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] when was pharo announced to the world?

by Mayuresh Kathe

hi sven, yes, i did look at it from a birthday perspective. and yes, it would be nice if stephane or marcus do suggest a date. :) ~mayuresh On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 01:30:37PM +0100, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Hi Mayuresh, > > You mean like a birthday ? Good idea ! > > I'll leave it to St??phane or Marcus to propose a date, Wikipedia says Pharo 1.0 was released on April 15th. But Pharo was of course already active for quite some time before that. > > Sven > > > On 25 Jan 2015, at 12:36, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > > > > hi, a trivial question; when was pharo announced to the world? > > > > we all could use that day as the one to collectively chip in some amount > > towards the project's operational expenses. > > > > a nice burst of funds, once a year might be a good thing compared to a > > funding drive (as some of the other open source projects carry out). > > > > ~mayuresh > > > > > >

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] NBSQLite3 on OS X - Pharo 3j

by Pierce Ng

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 25 Jan 2015, at 07:13, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > > On OSX, "OSProcessAccessor forThisOSProcess primGetCurrentWorkingDirectory" > > gives "/", while on Linux the same gives "/home/pierce/work/pharo30". (Above > > requires the OSProcess package which is available from the Config Browser.) > > Why not just use > FileSystem disk workingDirectory > ? It gives the expected answer on OSX, which is the directory where the image lives, and does not "explain" the OP's problem. :-) Pierce

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] UI framework&design options

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 25 Jan 2015, at 13:26, Piotr Klibert <piotr.klibert(a)10clouds.com> wrote: > >> >> is there a high-level overview of Roassal >> architecture somewhere? >> > > I just found http://agilevisualization.com/#book Yes, that one. The thing with Roassal and friends is also the examples, there are tons of them. But class comments would be good too ;-) > - last time I read > about Roassal was in a draft for Deep into Pharo a couple of years ago > and I'm glad to see that documentation situation improved so much. > Added to my reading list. > > > Best regards, > Piotr Klibert >

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] when was pharo announced to the world?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Hi Mayuresh, You mean like a birthday ? Good idea ! I'll leave it to StÃ©phane or Marcus to propose a date, Wikipedia says Pharo 1.0 was released on April 15th. But Pharo was of course already active for quite some time before that. Sven > On 25 Jan 2015, at 12:36, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > > hi, a trivial question; when was pharo announced to the world? > > we all could use that day as the one to collectively chip in some amount > towards the project's operational expenses. > > a nice burst of funds, once a year might be a good thing compared to a > funding drive (as some of the other open source projects carry out). > > ~mayuresh > >

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] UI framework&design options

by Piotr Klibert

> > is there a high-level overview of Roassal > architecture somewhere? > I just found http://agilevisualization.com/#book - last time I read about Roassal was in a draft for Deep into Pharo a couple of years ago and I'm glad to see that documentation situation improved so much. Added to my reading list. Best regards, Piotr Klibert

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] UI framework&design options

by Piotr Klibert

Hi, > > It however does not support adding > widgets without decoration straight to the desktop. > What about #openWorldWithSpec? As I understand this your top-level widget becomes your desktop and you can do whatever you want with it. > > As for pretty graphs, I recommend Roassal2 by the ObjectProfile guys. It > however cannot embed widgets in the graph as this is not its focus. > I didn't try it yet, but I'd be very surprised if it wasn't easily hackable, even if not directly supported. In the worst case you'd need to create RTView (or something similar, I read the docs long ago) subclasses to wrap pluggable widgets. BTW, when I browse Roassal2-Core I see almost all the classes are undocumented. This makes it a bit hard to infer high-level design of the code (it's common for me to work with Nautilus and pen&paper notebook for this...) - is there a high-level overview of Roassal architecture somewhere? Best regards, Piotr Klibert

Jan. 25, 2015