- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] when was pharo announced to the world?

by Marcus Denker

> On 25 Jan 2015, at 13:48, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > > hi sven, > > yes, i did look at it from a birthday perspective. > and yes, it would be nice if stephane or marcus do suggest a date. :) > we started sometime in 2008. I know that discussions started very early (Jan, Feb?), e.g to find a name. But it was announced laterâ¦ I guess I would need to dig in the old mails to find the exact date. Marcus

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Binary tree

by phil＠highoctane.be

I stored a package a while ago. http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/Trees Phil Le 25 janv. 2015 15:53, "Natalia Tymchuk" <natalia.tymchuk(a)unikernel.net> a Ã©crit : > Hello, > > Is there any implementation of the binary tree in Pharo? > > Best reagards, > Natalia > > > >

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by kilon alios

frankly I dont see why people keep linking this design document. Google has no clue about good design as most software companies, they definitely droped the ball in that area with Android. But that is my opinion. Pharo can be definetly be improved in several areas but it has been already a huge improvement over Squeak. So I am not afraid of Pharo design wise its on a good road and I try to also give it a helping hand :) Then on the other hand design is a matter of taste. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > while i admire what the pharo team has done with it's user interface, i > believe it can be improved. > has google's "material design" been considered off-late? > do take a look at; http://www.google.com/design/ > > ~mayuresh > > >

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] improving print-it in playground

by Tudor Girba

Thanks. Here are some examples: http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/guiding-custom-changes-with-gtinspect… http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/looking-for-hardcoded-traversal-metho… http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/debugging-the-debugger-with-the-inspe… Doru On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ben, >> >> In this case, why don't you inspect the list to the right and see a >> preview within the inspector? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> > > Maybe just habit. Sometimes its harder to change these little things, or > even to recognise that you've got them. I'll keep my eyes open for a > chance to do it the new way and see how it compares. > cheers -ben > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] improving print-it in playground

by Ben Coman

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > In this case, why don't you inspect the list to the right and see a > preview within the inspector? > > Cheers, > Doru > Maybe just habit. Sometimes its harder to change these little things, or even to recognise that you've got them. I'll keep my eyes open for a chance to do it the new way and see how it compares. cheers -ben

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] NBSQLite3 on OS X - Pharo 3j

by David T. Lewis

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > On 25 Jan 2015, at 07:13, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > > > > On OSX, "OSProcessAccessor forThisOSProcess primGetCurrentWorkingDirectory" > > gives "/", while on Linux the same gives "/home/pierce/work/pharo30". (Above > > requires the OSProcess package which is available from the Config Browser.) That sounds right. It calls getcwd() from the VM process. primGetCurrentWorkingDirectory "Call getcwd() to get the current working directory." The current working directory of the VM process will ("man 3 getcwd" for an exact description) will vary depending on how you launch the VM. Dave > > Why not just use > > FileSystem disk workingDirectory > > ?

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Esteban Lorenzano

But next year we will have an Athens based UI, so the performance will improve dramatically :) Real problem is to invest time (and talent) to improve current design... It costs much more than you could believe. Esteban > On 25/1/2015, at 15:42, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 03:35:40PM +0100, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: >>> >>> http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html >> >> >> It is almost impossible to do it like this in Pharo now because of low >> drawing performance and bad support of animations. Sad but true. > > thanks for the note. > > per you, how long would this low drawing performance and bad support for > animations issue hold true? > > ~mayuresh > >

Jan. 25, 2015

Binary tree

by Natalia Tymchuk

Hello, Is there any implementation of the binary tree in Pharo? Best reagards, Natalia

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Mayuresh Kathe

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 03:35:40PM +0100, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > > > http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html > > > It is almost impossible to do it like this in Pharo now because of low > drawing performance and bad support of animations. Sad but true. thanks for the note. per you, how long would this low drawing performance and bad support for animations issue hold true? ~mayuresh

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] UI framework&design options

by Peter Uhnak

Hi, what is in Deep into Pharo is describing Roassal1, but now we have Roassal2. Also the book is still work in progress... I believe Alex mentioned releasing it in mid 2015. Right now also the pharo and moose mailing list is good source of information, since roassal was discussed a lot in the past few months. Peter -----Original Message----- From: "Piotr Klibert" <piotr.klibert(a)10clouds.com> Sent: â1/â25/â2015 1:26 PM To: "Any question about pharo is welcome" <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] UI framework&design options > > is there a high-level overview of Roassal > architecture somewhere? > I just found http://agilevisualization.com/#book - last time I read about Roassal was in a draft for Deep into Pharo a couple of years ago and I'm glad to see that documentation situation improved so much. Added to my reading list. Best regards, Piotr Klibert

Jan. 25, 2015