- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] ExtendedNumberParser now has its own repository

by Werner Kassens

On 03/15/2015 09:41 PM, stepharo wrote: > Hi > > I did not want to lose the work of Nicolas Cellier around alternate > number parsers so I went > back in Pharo 30 and packaged them as a separate package (may be it was > already done but I could not find it). Hi Stephane, you can find ExtendedNumberParser in: http://www.squeaksource.com/ArbitraryPrecisionFl it is used by the class ArbitraryPrecisionFloat and since ArbitraryPrecisionFloat is actively held up to date by Nicolas, i'd guess the same is true for ExtendedNumberParser in this repository. werner

March 16, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Error while loading GitFileTree in Pharo 4.0

by Jigyasa Grover

Thanks! The error now says = File missing : ..\repository\MonticelloFileTree-Git.package\monticello.meta\version What is the way out ?

March 16, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Error while loading GitFileTree in Pharo 4.0

by Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras

it seems so. i was facing the same problem (sthub is dow :( ). On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Jigyasa Grover <grover.jigyasa1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > After following this -- > > Gofer it > url: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/MetaRepoForPharo40/main'; > configurationOf: 'GitFileTree'; > loadDevelopment > > I am getting unable to access smalltalkhub.com > I am also unable to connect to this website through browser. > Is it unavailable ? > > Thanks > Jigyasa Grover > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Jigyasa Grover <grover.jigyasa1(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Does there exist any alternative ? >> >> Thanks >> Jigyasa Grover >> >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Martin BÃ¤hr >> <mbaehr(a)email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: >>> >>> Excerpts from Jigyasa Grover's message of 2015-03-15 06:56:49 +0100: >>> > Whenever I click on Install stable version of GitFileTree >>> > (ThierryGoubier >>> > .33) in Configuration Browser in Pharo 4.0 , I get the error = The >>> > symbolic >>> > version #stable is not defined in Configuration GitFileTree for the >>> > current >>> > platform. Possible symbolic version values include : #(#bleedingEdge >>> > #development) >>> >>> i have seen the same error today. >>> seems there is a problem loading the current version. >>> >>> greetings, martin. >>> >>> -- >>> eKita - the online platform for your entire academic >>> life >>> -- >>> chief engineer >>> eKita.co >>> pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net >>> societyserver.org >>> secretary >>> beijinglug.org >>> mentor >>> fossasia.org >>> foresight developer foresightlinux.org >>> realss.com >>> unix sysadmin >>> Martin BÃ¤hr working in china >>> http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ >> >> > -- Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America.

March 16, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Error while loading GitFileTree in Pharo 4.0

by Jigyasa Grover

After following this -- Gofer it url: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/MetaRepoForPharo40/main'; configurationOf: 'GitFileTree'; loadDevelopment I am getting unable to access smalltalkhub.com I am also unable to connect to this website through browser. Is it unavailable ? Thanks Jigyasa Grover On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Jigyasa Grover <grover.jigyasa1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Does there exist any alternative ? > > Thanks > Jigyasa Grover > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Martin BÃ¤hr < > mbaehr(a)email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > >> Excerpts from Jigyasa Grover's message of 2015-03-15 06:56:49 +0100: >> > Whenever I click on Install stable version of GitFileTree >> (ThierryGoubier >> > .33) in Configuration Browser in Pharo 4.0 , I get the error = The >> symbolic >> > version #stable is not defined in Configuration GitFileTree for the >> current >> > platform. Possible symbolic version values include : #(#bleedingEdge >> > #development) >> >> i have seen the same error today. >> seems there is a problem loading the current version. >> >> greetings, martin. >> >> -- >> eKita - the online platform for your entire academic >> life >> -- >> chief engineer >> eKita.co >> pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net >> societyserver.org >> secretary >> beijinglug.org >> mentor >> fossasia.org >> foresight developer foresightlinux.org >> realss.com >> unix sysadmin >> Martin BÃ¤hr working in china >> http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ >> > >

March 16, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Git refreshing

by Thierry Goubier

I also believe that baselines + git branches and tags would simplify a lot complex projects configurations (Moose?). Thierry Le 15/03/2015 22:24, phil(a)highoctane.be a Ã©crit : > I moved my workflow to use git with Pharo. > > Took a while but can't go back. > > e.g. of collaboration > https://github.com/flow-stack/Mapless/pull/13/files > > Phil > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:14 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >>> At the same time, there is just me and Max (and Esteban as well, I think) >>> working on getting that git support working, so don't bash us too much. It's >>> hard enough to get it done (look at Max questions about libcgit) that we >>> don't need too much additional pressure. >> >> >> Thanks for that. >> Git is too complex for me, I feel dumb so this is good to know that you guys >> are spending time on that. >> >> > >

March 15, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] speed of streams?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

You are measuring image startup time, not the actual code. 'bar.txt' asFileReference writeStreamDo: [ :out | 10000 timesRepeat: [ out << Character alphabet; crlf ] ]. [ 'bar.txt' asFileReference contents ] bench. "37.296 per second" [ 'bar.txt' asFileReference contents ] timeToRun. "0:00:00:00.022" So reading a 260Kb file is pretty fast. Image startup is 0.5 seconds at best (headless, linux) in my experience. > On 15 Mar 2015, at 22:34, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Nicolas asked me the following questions and I was stuck :) > > Stef > > I have been doing some file intensive activities and found my program to be very slow. > Just to be sure I ran them in Java and found it was much faster > > So I did a small test: > --- > i := 0. > '/home/anquetil/Documents/RMod/Tools/workspace/Blocks/jfreechart-0_9_0.mse' asFileReference readStream contents do: [ :c | i:= i+1]. > --- > > 10 times with TimeProfiler : 14.436 sec > 10 times as a script passed to pharo-vm-nox (latest 4.0 image) : 16.07 sec > > similar thing (as far as I can tell) 10 times in java: 1.482 sec. > --- > public static void main(String[] args) { > int length =0; > try { > String filename = "/home/anquetil/Documents/RMod/Tools/workspace/Blocks/jfreechart-0_9_0.mse"; > String content = new String(Files.readAllBytes(Paths.get(filename)), "UTF8"); > for (int i=0; i < content.length(); i++) { > content.charAt(i); > length = length+1; > } > } catch (IOException e) { > e.printStackTrace(); > } > System.out.println(length); > } > --- > > is this known ? normal? > > nicolas > > PS: time for java and pharo script or measured as: > $ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do time run-experiment; done > >

March 15, 2015

speed of streams?

by stepharo

Nicolas asked me the following questions and I was stuck :) Stef I have been doing some file intensive activities and found my program to be very slow. Just to be sure I ran them in Java and found it was much faster So I did a small test: --- i := 0. '/home/anquetil/Documents/RMod/Tools/workspace/Blocks/jfreechart-0_9_0.mse' asFileReference readStream contents do: [ :c | i:= i+1]. --- 10 times with TimeProfiler : 14.436 sec 10 times as a script passed to pharo-vm-nox (latest 4.0 image) : 16.07 sec similar thing (as far as I can tell) 10 times in java: 1.482 sec. --- public static void main(String[] args) { int length =0; try { String filename = "/home/anquetil/Documents/RMod/Tools/workspace/Blocks/jfreechart-0_9_0.mse"; String content = new String(Files.readAllBytes(Paths.get(filename)), "UTF8"); for (int i=0; i < content.length(); i++) { content.charAt(i); length = length+1; } } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } System.out.println(length); } --- is this known ? normal? nicolas PS: time for java and pharo script or measured as: $ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do time run-experiment; done

March 15, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Git refreshing

by phil＠highoctane.be

I moved my workflow to use git with Pharo. Took a while but can't go back. e.g. of collaboration https://github.com/flow-stack/Mapless/pull/13/files Phil On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:14 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > >> At the same time, there is just me and Max (and Esteban as well, I think) >> working on getting that git support working, so don't bash us too much. It's >> hard enough to get it done (look at Max questions about libcgit) that we >> don't need too much additional pressure. > > > Thanks for that. > Git is too complex for me, I feel dumb so this is good to know that you guys > are spending time on that. > >

March 15, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Some MongoTalk cleanups

by phil＠highoctane.be

Excellent news. I'll look at that tomorrow afternoon. Phil On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:57 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > I do not know if it is related and may help but olivier auverlot did > FasterThanLight a pool sharing library. > > MCHttpRepository > location: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/RMoD/FasterThanLight/main' > user: '' > password: '' > > Stef > > Le 14/3/15 14:41, phil(a)highoctane.be a Ã©crit : > > I have been writing more extensive class comments for MongoTalk and > Mapless+MongoMapless. > > Will release next week. > > Need to remix the Voyage pool with tye Mapless pool and it will quite neat. > > Note: we need a full features pool once and for all, like JEE DataSources. > What we have is okay but still half baked vs the DataSource. > > MaplessMongo and Roassal2 are very nice to work with! > > Phil > > Le 14 mars 2015 14:23, "stepharo" <stepharo(a)free.fr> a Ã©crit : >> >> Thanks torsten >> This little steps are really important! >> >> Stef >> >> Le 4/3/15 11:25, Torsten Bergmann a Ã©crit : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> cleaned up MongoTalk a little bit: >>> >>> - added a new baseline 1.7 with separate test packages for "BSON" and >>> "Core", so tests are now separately loadable >>> - more comments and more/better categorizations >>> - printOn: in database and collections to print the name >>> - MongoQueries is now "Mongo-Queries" and "Mongo-Tests-Queries" (hence >>> the name of the first to be in >>> alignment with other packages) >>> - make Config aware/loadable for upcoming Pharo 4 >>> - the Config now is working and saved with Versionner >>> - the Config also includes groups (Core, Tests and default) >>> - it is now available in MetaRepoForPharo40 so it is in the config >>> browser of Pharo4 >>> - all 55 tests are green in latest Pharo 4.0 #40534 >>> >>> Just cleanups, no behavior changes >>> >>> Bye >>> T. >> >> >> >> >

March 15, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Git refreshing

by stepharo

> At the same time, there is just me and Max (and Esteban as well, I > think) working on getting that git support working, so don't bash us > too much. It's hard enough to get it done (look at Max questions about > libcgit) that we don't need too much additional pressure. Thanks for that. Git is too complex for me, I feel dumb so this is good to know that you guys are spending time on that.

March 15, 2015