- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Slow compilation on one of my Windows PCs

by Jan BlizniÄenko

I'm gonna try to reply to all of you and try your ideas Stephan Eggermont wrote > On 30-06-15 14:37, Jan BlizniÄenko wrote: >> Unfortunately no - all benchmarks I made with antivirus disabled. > > Including the Microsoft stuff itself? (Security Essentials/Windows > Defender) Does your desktop have a drive > 2TB? Yes, all such things I have disabled / removed. Mariano Martinez Peck wrote > Can you think of any other window process that could be detecting changes > all the time in .changes and therefore have an impact in the performance? > Do you have such pharo image in dropbox or similar service? I don't think so. I tried even running Windows in diagnostic startup (safe mode / running with only core processes and services) and it had no effect. Mariano Martinez Peck wrote > I would check the processes running and CPU of Windows while loading the > code... I was looking at it some time ago and it didn't seem like processor is too much busy, but as I think about it, it is suspiciously almost not busy at all ... ~1 % of processor usage. On laptop it fluctuates between 5 and 10 %. I'm talking about usage when benchmarking the "store" code. philippeback wrote > Silly question: do you have a couple of Nautilus windows open? > > Loading stuff generates annoucements and Nautilus updates are killing > performance. No, only open thing is Playground from which I run the benchmarking codes. Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >> On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:36, Peter UhnÃ¡k < > i.uhnak@ > > wrote: >> >> I think we've safely established that the bottleneck is disk operations. > > Let's take it one level down then, > > [ 'foo.txt' asFileReference in: [ :file | > file writeStreamDo: [ :out | > 3 timesRepeat: [ out << String loremIpsum ] ]. > file ensureDelete ] ] bench > > => "'512.595 per second'" > > We could experiment with variants, calling #flush, writing by character, > adding buffering, etc, but this is a start. At least this takes the source > code stuff out of the equations. "654.738 per second" on desktop "1,271 per second" on laptop Thank you all for ideas. Jan -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Slow-compilation-on-one-of-my-Windows-PCs-tp4834668p4… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

July 1, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Mofify websockets status to deliver SVG?

by Stephan Eggermont

On 30/06/15 22:56, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Stephan Eggermont wrote >> Screenshot from 2015-06-30 22:46:08.png (110K) >> <http://forum.world.st/attachment/4834997/0/Screenshot%20from%202015-06-30%2022%3A46%3A08.png> > > I'm not following. What is the screenshot? A working app in the browser? an > exported read-only view? Exported read-only view, synchronized every second with the Morphic cardwall. Stephan

June 30, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Mofify websockets status to deliver SVG?

by Sean P. DeNigris

Stephan Eggermont wrote > Exported read-only view, synchronized every second with the Morphic > cardwall Not bad! I judge that 7/10 on the coolness scale between my two options :) ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Mofify-websockets-status-to-deliver-SVG-tp4834991p483… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 30, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Mofify websockets status to deliver SVG?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Nice ! > On 30 Jun 2015, at 22:46, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > > On 30-06-15 22:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> Use ZnLogEvent, for example, by using #logToTranscript. > > Thanks, I managed to get it to work. > > Stephan > > > <Screenshot from 2015-06-30 22:46:08.png>

June 30, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Mofify websockets status to deliver SVG?

by Sean P. DeNigris

Stephan Eggermont wrote > Screenshot from 2015-06-30 22:46:08.png (110K) > <http://forum.world.st/attachment/4834997/0/Screenshot%20from%202015-06-30%2022%3A46%3A08.png> I'm not following. What is the screenshot? A working app in the browser? an exported read-only view? ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Mofify-websockets-status-to-deliver-SVG-tp4834991p483… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 30, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Mofify websockets status to deliver SVG?

by Stephan Eggermont

On 30-06-15 22:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Use ZnLogEvent, for example, by using #logToTranscript. Thanks, I managed to get it to work. Stephan

June 30, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Modern Events Touch and Gestures in Pharo.

by J.F. Rick

Awesome! There's a reasonable chance that I can contribute to this (or at least utilize it), depending on what contracts I get. If I do get that in the near future, who do I contact about contributing? Cheers, Jeff On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:18 PM stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > Thanks Thales for the sponsoring. > > https://youtu.be/eNrbH8A5nyY > > Stef and the rmod team > >

June 30, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Mofify websockets status to deliver SVG?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Use ZnLogEvent, for example, by using #logToTranscript. > On 30 Jun 2015, at 22:09, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > > Now the cardwall can export SVG, I thought it would be nice > to modify & reuse the websockets status code to serve the SVG. > How do I debug that? > > Stephan > >

June 30, 2015

Mofify websockets status to deliver SVG?

by Stephan Eggermont

Now the cardwall can export SVG, I thought it would be nice to modify & reuse the websockets status code to serve the SVG. How do I debug that? Stephan

June 30, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Slow compilation on one of my Windows PCs

by Craig Johnson

On 2015/06/30 07:42 PM, Peter UhnÃ¡k wrote: > Debian (host) "'4,855 per second'" > > Ubuntu (vbox) "'4,709 per second'" > > Win XP (vbox) "'504.099 per second'" My my Win 7 (host) ( i7 CPU @ 2.10GHz) => 862.000 per second Still a far cry from what the Linux boxes do. I'm watching with interest. Craig

June 30, 2015