- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

by stepharo

Part of the Phd of Romain Robbes was about comparing completion algorithms. And NOC/NEC are part of the results but it needs a real pass. Stef > > Hi Nicolai, > imagine that code-completion is a game and the computer wins, if the > user mostly uses the first few proposals. perhaps one could program > several different heuristics, that decide, what the user wants. > depending on the user choices, the weights for these heuristics get > updated accordingly and then the choices get sorted with those > weights. this way the code-completion could adapt to the way each user > works? > werner > >

Oct. 6, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

by Henrik Johansen

> On 06 Oct 2015, at 1:33 , Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > > > > 2015-10-06 11:57 GMT+02:00 Werner Kassens <wkassens(a)libello.com <mailto:wkassens@libello.com>>: > On 10/06/2015 09:09 AM, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > Since Object has almost 500 methods whatever I will start typing > Object/TClass/TBehavior/... will have a list of answers... > > I think this is difficult, even though this classes are big and you > don't use most of the methods, > > > Hi Nicolai, > imagine that code-completion is a game and the computer wins, if the user mostly uses the first few proposals. perhaps one could program several different heuristics, that decide, what the user wants. depending on the user choices, the weights for these heuristics get updated accordingly and then the choices get sorted with those weights. this way the code-completion could adapt to the way each user works? > > > Yes this would be nice, but it is not an easy task. > > werner > > I thought we already had something like that... http://www.squeaksource.com/OCompletion/ Cheers, Henry

Oct. 6, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

by Nicolai Hess

2015-10-06 11:57 GMT+02:00 Werner Kassens <wkassens(a)libello.com>: > On 10/06/2015 09:09 AM, Nicolai Hess wrote: > >> > Since Object has almost 500 methods whatever I will start typing >> Object/TClass/TBehavior/... will have a list of answers... >> >> I think this is difficult, even though this classes are big and you >> don't use most of the methods, >> >> > Hi Nicolai, > imagine that code-completion is a game and the computer wins, if the user > mostly uses the first few proposals. perhaps one could program several > different heuristics, that decide, what the user wants. depending on the > user choices, the weights for these heuristics get updated accordingly and > then the choices get sorted with those weights. this way the > code-completion could adapt to the way each user works? > Yes this would be nice, but it is not an easy task. > werner > >

Oct. 6, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

by Nicolai Hess

2015-10-06 10:31 GMT+02:00 Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com>: > > On 06 Oct 2015, at 09:09, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > > > Am 04.10.2015 23:53 schrieb "Peter UhnÃ¡k" <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>: > > > > This is both rant and list of questions/notes/observations... > > > > ...but first of all: > > do Smalltalkers not like code completion? Because the one in Pharo is > really poor and not only that nobody is doing anything about it, but also > nobody is complaining; this leads me to believe that you either > > > > a) don't have the manpower (this is true pretty much always, so no > complaints here) > > b) don't care about this that much (since you lived without it for 45 > years) > > > > at least from the lack of complaining to me it seems that b) is more > likely scenario... > > > > But since I do use it, I get annoyed by it quite a bit, especially since > I regularly work in IDEs where this thousand times better. > > > Can you Name one, for a dynamic OO - language? > (Maybe we can borrow some ideas). > > > Ruby? > > I think that RubyMine has to do something with code completion. > Wow, that looks great, do you work with it? > > Uko > > > > > > Now I would like to get things moving a bit (or bury it and forget it), > so I have couple of questions and would appreciate if someone could provide > some feedback. > > > > 1. Methods of core/top classes should be deprioritized > > > > Since Object has almost 500 methods whatever I will start typing > Object/TClass/TBehavior/... will have a list of answers... > > I think this is difficult, even though this classes are big and you don't > use most of the methods, > > are you sure we dont use some of the methods *often*. Morphic, > ComposeableModel or many collection classes, for example. > > > > > so let's start typing... > > > > > > > > > > > > Very often I have to type almost full word to see what I want. > > This is doesn't happen often to me. It is far from perfect but most of the > time I only type a small part and find the correct completion. > > > > Shouldn't the completion follow the inheritance chain? So first it shows > me matches from the class itself (especially since it actually knows the > type) and only after then it's parents and so on? > > Currently, it only collects all selectors into a set and sorts by > matching and length. > > We could add the class info and sort by inheritance distance. > > This needs some change how sorting is implemented, for now,it is typeless > and may need some double dispatching. > > > > > > 3. Or maybe even show the (closest) class that implements it. > > So the last two items would have somewhere (beginning or the end) > written '(Object)' and the first two '(yourself)' (or the class's name). > > This needs some additional work too, now the menu text is the actual > completion content. But it > > shouldn't be that difficult and some code looks like it was intended to > work that way. > > > > > > > 2. The window has fixed size, so if I have longer method (as in picture > above) I don't see it all. > > > > 3. Is middle-of-the word really that often used? See > moseIntere<sti>ngEntity above. It feels to me that it just creates a lot of > false positives (I have this problem also with inspector btw, so I often > have to prefix it with >># or if I see it already lot of <arrow down>, > which is annoying) > > I often search for "Dictionary" or "Morph" and expect results even if the > typed word is not at the beginning, quite often. > > > > > > > > > > 4. We write tests, however how often have you manually created an > instance of a test class by hand? I think they should be either filtered or > deprioritized as they create visual clutter. This is probably also true for > many other classes such as ConfigurationOf/Manifest/... Nobody instantiates > them by hand. > > Be careful will statements like "nobody ...." > > I do a lot of reviews for pharo issues, and this involves working in > workspace and instantiating classes (Yes, Tests, Refactoring, LintRules) > most people don't use them this way but by the tools (SUnit, CriticBrowser) > > But I do. > > > > > > > 5. How often do you send #abs to a dictionary? > > seldom, never? but how could a completion framework detect that? > > > > > > > > 6. If I have already written part of the selector it's impossible to > "continue" and add an extra parameter. This is because it doesn't know if I > am code completing for dict, or #key. > > Maybe different shortcuts? <tab> to code complete on #key, and > <shift+tab> to code complete on the previous one... > > good idea! > > (did you know, that there is a shortcut to jump from one message send > argument to another (not related to completion, but very helpful). Sadly > this is gone or I couldn't find > > it in rubrics shortcut handling). > > > or maybe cycle through them because this can be nested (the currently > code completed item would have to be highlighted somehow). > > > > > > 7. So if I don't want to see the above I have to type it manually; which > is fine for #at:put: but not for longer words.. (just to find out ten > seconds later that I have a stupid typo there). > > > > 8. The code completion doesn't show parameter names. This is very > helpful because it often reveals what it actually accepts. Now I have to > actually look into the code of the method. > > Yes, I tried to change that for issue "10219 > <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10219/Completion-enter-on-accept-awkwardn…> > Completion: enter on accept awkwardness", but again, the completion only > knows about the methodDict keys, the selector, > > not the mehod code. But I would like to change that and test if it is much > slow. > > > > > > Now we can hardly compete with typed languages, but I think there's a > lot lot room for improvement. > > > > For comparison from other languages/IDE's. > > > > PhpStorm/PHP > > > > (notice how it shows the whole method if it's longer than the window and > doesn't it just clip)â > > > > NetBeans/C++ > > > > > > > > In the picture above it âstill provides hinting when typing the > parameter. > > > > TypeScript playground > > > > > > â(similar to NetBeans) > > > > Also they have in their online playground better and nicer code > completion than we have in actual env ( > http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground ) > > > > So if you have any thoughts/feedback/whatnot on this matter, I would > greatly appreciate it. > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > >

Oct. 6, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

by Werner Kassens

On 10/06/2015 09:09 AM, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > Since Object has almost 500 methods whatever I will start typing > Object/TClass/TBehavior/... will have a list of answers... > > I think this is difficult, even though this classes are big and you > don't use most of the methods, > Hi Nicolai, imagine that code-completion is a game and the computer wins, if the user mostly uses the first few proposals. perhaps one could program several different heuristics, that decide, what the user wants. depending on the user choices, the weights for these heuristics get updated accordingly and then the choices get sorted with those weights. this way the code-completion could adapt to the way each user works? werner

Oct. 6, 2015

About Magritte Seaside

by stepharo

Hi guys How can I get Magritte seaside (and a working version not one breaking on XML I do not what)? I loaded the published stable version of Magritte into Pharo and there is no seaside version. I checked the configuration and it is so complex.... I have the impression that we need to distinguish Magritte from Magritte seaside. So I will do a separate configuration of magritte seaside. Stef

Oct. 6, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

by Yuriy Tymchuk

> On 06 Oct 2015, at 09:09, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > > > Am 04.10.2015 23:53 schrieb "Peter UhnÃ¡k" <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com <mailto:i.uhnak@gmail.com>>: > > > > This is both rant and list of questions/notes/observations... > > > > ...but first of all: > > do Smalltalkers not like code completion? Because the one in Pharo is really poor and not only that nobody is doing anything about it, but also nobody is complaining; this leads me to believe that you either > > > > a) don't have the manpower (this is true pretty much always, so no complaints here) > > b) don't care about this that much (since you lived without it for 45 years) > > > > at least from the lack of complaining to me it seems that b) is more likely scenario... > > > > But since I do use it, I get annoyed by it quite a bit, especially since I regularly work in IDEs where this thousand times better. > > > Can you Name one, for a dynamic OO - language? > (Maybe we can borrow some ideas). > > Ruby? I think that RubyMine has to do something with code completion. Uko > > > > > Now I would like to get things moving a bit (or bury it and forget it), so I have couple of questions and would appreciate if someone could provide some feedback. > > > > 1. Methods of core/top classes should be deprioritized > > > > Since Object has almost 500 methods whatever I will start typing Object/TClass/TBehavior/... will have a list of answers... > > I think this is difficult, even though this classes are big and you don't use most of the methods, > > are you sure we dont use some of the methods *often*. Morphic, ComposeableModel or many collection classes, for example. > > > > > so let's start typing... > > > > > > > > > > > > Very often I have to type almost full word to see what I want. > > This is doesn't happen often to me. It is far from perfect but most of the time I only type a small part and find the correct completion. > > > > Shouldn't the completion follow the inheritance chain? So first it shows me matches from the class itself (especially since it actually knows the type) and only after then it's parents and so on? > > Currently, it only collects all selectors into a set and sorts by matching and length. > > We could add the class info and sort by inheritance distance. > > This needs some change how sorting is implemented, for now,it is typeless and may need some double dispatching. > > > > > > 3. Or maybe even show the (closest) class that implements it. > > So the last two items would have somewhere (beginning or the end) written '(Object)' and the first two '(yourself)' (or the class's name). > > This needs some additional work too, now the menu text is the actual completion content. But it > > shouldn't be that difficult and some code looks like it was intended to work that way. > > > > > > > 2. The window has fixed size, so if I have longer method (as in picture above) I don't see it all. > > > > 3. Is middle-of-the word really that often used? See moseIntere<sti>ngEntity above. It feels to me that it just creates a lot of false positives (I have this problem also with inspector btw, so I often have to prefix it with >># or if I see it already lot of <arrow down>, which is annoying) > > I often search for "Dictionary" or "Morph" and expect results even if the typed word is not at the beginning, quite often. > > > > > > > > > > > 4. We write tests, however how often have you manually created an instance of a test class by hand? I think they should be either filtered or deprioritized as they create visual clutter. This is probably also true for many other classes such as ConfigurationOf/Manifest/... Nobody instantiates them by hand. > > Be careful will statements like "nobody ...." > > I do a lot of reviews for pharo issues, and this involves working in workspace and instantiating classes (Yes, Tests, Refactoring, LintRules) most people don't use them this way but by the tools (SUnit, CriticBrowser) > > But I do. > > > > > > > > 5. How often do you send #abs to a dictionary? > > seldom, never? but how could a completion framework detect that? > > > > > > > > > 6. If I have already written part of the selector it's impossible to "continue" and add an extra parameter. This is because it doesn't know if I am code completing for dict, or #key. > > Maybe different shortcuts? <tab> to code complete on #key, and <shift+tab> to code complete on the previous one... > > good idea! > > (did you know, that there is a shortcut to jump from one message send argument to another (not related to completion, but very helpful). Sadly this is gone or I couldn't find > > it in rubrics shortcut handling). > > > or maybe cycle through them because this can be nested (the currently code completed item would have to be highlighted somehow). > > > > > > 7. So if I don't want to see the above I have to type it manually; which is fine for #at:put: but not for longer words.. (just to find out ten seconds later that I have a stupid typo there). > > > > 8. The code completion doesn't show parameter names. This is very helpful because it often reveals what it actually accepts. Now I have to actually look into the code of the method. > > Yes, I tried to change that for issue "10219 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10219/Completion-enter-on-accept-awkwardn…> Completion: enter on accept awkwardness", but again, the completion only knows about the methodDict keys, the selector, > > not the mehod code. But I would like to change that and test if it is much slow. > > > > > > Now we can hardly compete with typed languages, but I think there's a lot lot room for improvement. > > > > For comparison from other languages/IDE's. > > > > PhpStorm/PHP > > > > (notice how it shows the whole method if it's longer than the window and doesn't it just clip)â > > > > NetBeans/C++ > > > > > > > > In the picture above it âstill provides hinting when typing the parameter. > > > > TypeScript playground > > > > > > â(similar to NetBeans) > > > > Also they have in their online playground better and nicer code completion than we have in actual env (http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground <http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground> ) > > > > So if you have any thoughts/feedback/whatnot on this matter, I would greatly appreciate it. > > > > > > > > > > Peter > >

Oct. 6, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

by Stephan Eggermont

On 04-10-15 23:53, Peter UhnÃ¡k wrote: > 3. Is middle-of-the word really that often used? See > moseIntere<sti>ngEntity above. It feels to me that it just creates a lot of > false positives (I have this problem also with inspector btw, so I often > have to prefix it with >># or if I see it already lot of <arrow down>, > which is annoying) One of the things we can do is detect prefixes. If all classes in a package start with the same two letters... Stephan

Oct. 6, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

by Nicolai Hess

Am 04.10.2015 23:53 schrieb "Peter UhnÃ¡k" <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>: > > This is both rant and list of questions/notes/observations... > > ...but first of all: > do Smalltalkers not like code completion? Because the one in Pharo is really poor and not only that nobody is doing anything about it, but also nobody is complaining; this leads me to believe that you either > > a) don't have the manpower (this is true pretty much always, so no complaints here) > b) don't care about this that much (since you lived without it for 45 years) > > at least from the lack of complaining to me it seems that b) is more likely scenario... > > But since I do use it, I get annoyed by it quite a bit, especially since I regularly work in IDEs where this thousand times better. Can you Name one, for a dynamic OO - language? (Maybe we can borrow some ideas). > > Now I would like to get things moving a bit (or bury it and forget it), so I have couple of questions and would appreciate if someone could provide some feedback. > > 1. Methods of core/top classes should be deprioritized > > Since Object has almost 500 methods whatever I will start typing Object/TClass/TBehavior/... will have a list of answers... I think this is difficult, even though this classes are big and you don't use most of the methods, are you sure we dont use some of the methods *often*. Morphic, ComposeableModel or many collection classes, for example. > > so let's start typing... > > > > > > Very often I have to type almost full word to see what I want. This is doesn't happen often to me. It is far from perfect but most of the time I only type a small part and find the correct completion. > Shouldn't the completion follow the inheritance chain? So first it shows me matches from the class itself (especially since it actually knows the type) and only after then it's parents and so on? Currently, it only collects all selectors into a set and sorts by matching and length. We could add the class info and sort by inheritance distance. This needs some change how sorting is implemented, for now,it is typeless and may need some double dispatching. > > 3. Or maybe even show the (closest) class that implements it. > So the last two items would have somewhere (beginning or the end) written '(Object)' and the first two '(yourself)' (or the class's name). This needs some additional work too, now the menu text is the actual completion content. But it shouldn't be that difficult and some code looks like it was intended to work that way. > > > 2. The window has fixed size, so if I have longer method (as in picture above) I don't see it all. > > 3. Is middle-of-the word really that often used? See moseIntere<sti>ngEntity above. It feels to me that it just creates a lot of false positives (I have this problem also with inspector btw, so I often have to prefix it with >># or if I see it already lot of <arrow down>, which is annoying) I often search for "Dictionary" or "Morph" and expect results even if the typed word is not at the beginning, quite often. > > > > 4. We write tests, however how often have you manually created an instance of a test class by hand? I think they should be either filtered or deprioritized as they create visual clutter. This is probably also true for many other classes such as ConfigurationOf/Manifest/... Nobody instantiates them by hand. Be careful will statements like "nobody ...." I do a lot of reviews for pharo issues, and this involves working in workspace and instantiating classes (Yes, Tests, Refactoring, LintRules) most people don't use them this way but by the tools (SUnit, CriticBrowser) But I do. > > 5. How often do you send #abs to a dictionary? seldom, never? but how could a completion framework detect that? > > > 6. If I have already written part of the selector it's impossible to "continue" and add an extra parameter. This is because it doesn't know if I am code completing for dict, or #key. > Maybe different shortcuts? <tab> to code complete on #key, and <shift+tab> to code complete on the previous one... good idea! (did you know, that there is a shortcut to jump from one message send argument to another (not related to completion, but very helpful). Sadly this is gone or I couldn't find it in rubrics shortcut handling). > or maybe cycle through them because this can be nested (the currently code completed item would have to be highlighted somehow). > > > 7. So if I don't want to see the above I have to type it manually; which is fine for #at:put: but not for longer words.. (just to find out ten seconds later that I have a stupid typo there). > > 8. The code completion doesn't show parameter names. This is very helpful because it often reveals what it actually accepts. Now I have to actually look into the code of the method. Yes, I tried to change that for issue "10219 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10219/Completion-enter-on-accept-awkwardn…> Completion: enter on accept awkwardness", but again, the completion only knows about the methodDict keys, the selector, not the mehod code. But I would like to change that and test if it is much slow. > > Now we can hardly compete with typed languages, but I think there's a lot lot room for improvement. > > For comparison from other languages/IDE's. > > PhpStorm/PHP > > (notice how it shows the whole method if it's longer than the window and doesn't it just clip)â > > NetBeans/C++ > > > > In the picture above it âstill provides hinting when typing the parameter. > > TypeScript playground > > > â(similar to NetBeans) > > Also they have in their online playground better and nicer code completion than we have in actual env ( http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground ) > > So if you have any thoughts/feedback/whatnot on this matter, I would greatly appreciate it. > > Peter >

Oct. 6, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Nautilus>>openOnClass: gives back a debugger

by Marcus Denker

> On 06 Oct 2015, at 08:31, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)web.de> wrote: > > > > 2015-10-06 8:06 GMT+02:00 stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr <mailto:stepharo@free.fr>>: > Hi federico > > in which version because we cleaned a lot of bad code in nautilus in 5.0 alpha > > > Le 6/10/15 01:10, Federico.Balaguer a Ã©crit : > > Hello, > > I found a problem when evaluating something like: > > Nautilus openOnClass: Object > > The result is a new Nautilus on Object but the package tree list is empty > and a debugger pops up with a back trace with this: > NautilusUI(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #useLastPackagePatternStringForClass: > Nautilus class>>openOnClass:inEnvironment: > Nautilus class>>openOnClass: > > is there other way to open Nautilus programatically. > > Thanks!! Federico > > > > And is it important whether Nautilus opens or any other installed browser? > You can programatically open the browser with > > Object browse. Or Smalltalk tools browser fullOnClass: Object The reason is that it is actually PackageTreeNautilus that is usedâ¦ Yes, in need to be cleaned up. We did already a huge step in Pharo5. If someone wants to do a minimal fix for Pharo4, this would be niceâ¦ Marcus

Oct. 6, 2015