- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Nautilus code critic panel non functional

by Dimitris Chloupis

Used to work ok, now with the latest pharo 5 image its just seem to scan forever with no results relevant bug report https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17401/

Jan. 16, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic is super slow

by Ben Coman

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Ben :) > > First thanks for investing 1 hour of your precious time to look through my > code. I really appreciate it . If there is one thing I love about pharo is > the super amazing community. > > Yes definetly my fault as always :D > > I did not know about this profiling, I used it for the creating of my Morphs > but it did not occur to me to google like you did and go with profiling all > processes. > > A huge thank you to latsaben and the rest of you guys. I downgraded down to > Pharo 4 and again I agree 5 is the unstable version anyway but I loved using > the new tools and could not wait till April for the Pharo 5 release :) > > The problem is battling without documentation is very hard and I have spent > at least 10 hours trying to understand how taskbar works and I still fail. > > Your code solves my problem , apart from 1. Loading those pngs is sloowwwww, > one would expect that accesing the files themselves to get the binary data > is what is slow for pharo but no, thats is fast enough. What is slow , > because I profiled this is converting the binary data to form is consuming > a ton of time. The result is that to load a GUI with only 1 mb of pngs takes > 1 second. What is the practical effect of this that is most concerning? 1. The time taken loading it the first time after installing from Catalog Browser ? 2. The time taken to start it *each* time from World > Chronos Manager, if you open/close it a lot? 3. Distributing Chronos Manager as a packaged application? each time you want to open it Not sure if the following will suit your needs, but in the definition of ChrGUIMorph try moving 'secondsTimerFormCollection' from instanceVariableNames: to classVariableNames: then test by opening/closing the app a few times. After taking a while opening the first time, subsequent openings seem to be faster. > > Also with your solution I lose the ability to update my taskbar icon, by the > way the non optimised code I was using is a direct copy from SystemWindow > class, which means that class should be optimised too. So consider that solution just a problem-isolation step on the way ;). I had another look because I was intrigued that even though you used LRUCache for the /icons/ variable, the ifAbsent: block in #logotinyIcon was being executed anyway. I thought that must be cache size too small and items bumped out, so as a test I replace LRUCache with Dictionary, but the the ifAbsent: block was *still* getting executed (note, this is at steady-state, not startup). So I thought /icons/ must be getting reset. Investigating by putting the following at the top of #initializeIcons... Transcript crShow: thisContext printString , ' <-- ', thisContext sender printString, ' <-- ', thisContext sender sender printString. So now this executes every time I open the World menu. And after ChronosManager is opened, the Transcript scroll rapidly. So everywhere you do something like this... icon: ChrStopwatchSettingsPNG new logotinyIcon where logotinyIcon returns an object, the object created by #new is thrown away. Worse, #new invokes #initialize and hence #initializeIcons wipes out your cache every cycle. Try making /icons/ a class variable and moving methods like logotinyIcon to the class side, so instead you do... icon: ChrStopwatchSettingsPNG logotinyIcon Also move #initializeIcons to class side and add a class side #initialize method to call it. Note that will only be executed when the class is first loaded, so you will probably need to execute it manually in your image. One thing I'm interested in the choice of LRUCache over Dictionary for the cache? Did you find Dictionary was taking too much space? I didn't try implementing the above yet, but I guessing you'll get the performance fix while maintaining the flexibility you want. cheers -ben > Another problem is the scaling of images, really bad with morphic though > Athens must be better. > > Auto completion problems are well knows, sometimes autocompletion does not > show all methods, sometimes autocompletion shows every character you type so > for example ChronosManager open will show > ChronosManager o > ChronosManager op > ChronosManager ope > ChronosManager open > > Sometimes it shows methods that do not even belong to the class forcing me > to use Spotter to find the correct method. Its a a mess. > > I am not abandoning pharo, I love it even with its flaws. But I try to > outsource as much as I can my workflow from pharo to external libraries and > apps that are way more mature and efficient for what I am trying to do. > > I always inteded to make Blender work with Pharo, I accomplished that now I > want to make Unreal engine to work with pharo, so I can make a triangle of > love, Blender for asset creation, Unreal for real time rendering of 2d and > 3d graphics , Pharo as the brain of the logic and advanced scripting of the > other 2. This is was my dream and goal all along. So I will be moving my GUI > to Unreal that will allow me much more advanced and performance orientated > features that mix 2d with 3d but I will keeping my main logic in pharo. > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:35 AM Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Dimitris Chloupis >> <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > taskbarTask (self valueOfProperty: #noTaskbarTask ifAbsent: [ false ]) >> > ifTrue: [ ^ nil ]. ^ nil "TaskbarTask morph: self state: self >> > taskbarState >> > icon: self taskbarIcon label: self taskbarLabel" >> > >> > The uncommented part was the one that was slowing me down, its a copy >> > from >> > SystemWindow, on a new image of Pharo consumption drops to 15% but still >> > have issues with Nautilus etc. >> > >> > latsabben at Slack also recommended caching which helped also >> > >> > taskbarTask "myTask := nil." myTask ifNil: [ myTask := TaskbarTask >> > morph: >> > self state: self taskbarState icon: self taskbarIcon label: self >> > taskbarLabel ]. myTask label: self taskbarLabel. ^myTask >> > >> > Anyway I decided to port my project to C++ and Unreal Engine because I >> > have >> > many issues with Pharo speed wise >> >> See my other post, in about an hour I moved your App from 55% cpu >> usage on my machine to 7%, only 1% above our 6% idle. We *do* need >> to address that minimum idle, but its at the VM level since in-Image >> profiling shows 90% time in ProcessorScheduler class>>idleProcess. So >> to me the Image seems not too bad performance wise >> >> > and stability wise with Pharo 5. >> >> Well, you are talking about bleeding edge alpha software. >> >> > Plus many IDE features I miss like proper auto completion etc. >> >> You've probably mentioned this somewhere previously, but in another >> thread could you leave us with a summary of what is missing from auto >> completion. >> >> > To be fair I tried to make custom gui with python and it was even slower >> > in >> > the past. >> > >> > So its clear I need a high performance language + API, because I will be >> > building a very heavy GUI (many more animations) and I would like also >> > some >> > fast 3d functionality too. >> >> good luck with it. >> cheers -ben >> >> >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:07 AM Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 15 Jan 2016, at 23:30, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> > taskbar was the problem, damn pharo gui is a huge pain in the hat. >> >> >> >> How so ? >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:32 PM Dimitris Chloupis >> >> > <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > ITs not the step, I removed the step as I said in my first post. >> >> > Still >> >> > 30% cpu consumption >> >> > >> >> > The images are PNGs and RGBA , 8bit >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:54 PM Hilaire <hilaire(a)drgeo.eu> wrote: >> >> > It depends on what you are doing in a step, but 1s step should not >> >> > hurt. >> >> > May be the problem is somewhere else. >> >> > With DrGeo, I noted Athens is faster to BitBlt with bitmap operations >> >> > (in my case, only scaling and displaying a From in a DrGeo canvas). >> >> > Also, do your bitmaps come with 32 bits depth? >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Dr. Geo >> >> > http://drgeo.eu >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >

Jan. 16, 2016

Pharo Sound does not work on Pharo 4

by Dimitris Chloupis

even though it works fine for me in Pharo 5 (with the exception I have to restart the sound player because the primitive fails at times) in Pharo 4 I have no sound and no errors. Just Silence of the Lamps. opened bug report https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17402/Pharo-Sound-does-not-work-on-Pharo-4

Jan. 16, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic is super slow

by Dimitris Chloupis

my bad Marcus done https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16020/Syntax-Highlighting-Rubric-First-sh… and https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17401/Nautilus-code-critic-seem-not-worki… On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 2:03 PM Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > On 16 Jan 2016, at 12:38, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > > > > >>> syntax highlighting does not work, critics its keep looping forever > with "Updating critics..." message. I have to minimise and restore the > nautlius window to get back syntax highlighting for one method then the > next method i have to do the same. > >> > >> syntax highlighting is because there is a new somekind experimental AST > based highlighter. > > > > What would be nice is that when we push something in the release there > is a real support behind. > > It took us three months of work with frank to get rubric used. Then the > last glitches are just because > > we do not want syntax hi in certain parts. > > > Slow syntax highlighting is not due to the new one but due to changes > related to rubric. > > It gets a bit hard to follow these discussionsâ¦. could people not instead > use their time and > energy to add issue tracker entries and (especially) comment on existing > ones? > > Marcus > > >

Jan. 16, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic is super slow

by Dimitris Chloupis

If there is anything I can do to help you out dont hesitate to ask. I tried to improve auto completion but I have to confess after 30 hours of work I could not figure out how things really worked. So I gave up and went back to coding my own stuff. On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:39 PM stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > >> syntax highlighting does not work, critics its keep looping forever > >> with "Updating critics..." message. I have to minimise and restore > >> the nautlius window to get back syntax highlighting for one method > >> then the next method i have to do the same. > > > > syntax highlighting is because there is a new somekind experimental > > AST based highlighter. > > What would be nice is that when we push something in the release there > is a real support behind. > It took us three months of work with frank to get rubric used. Then the > last glitches are just because > we do not want syntax hi in certain parts. > > Stef > > We want to finish it, but weâll seeâ¦ > > > > Esteban > > > > >

Jan. 16, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic is super slow

by Marcus Denker

> On 16 Jan 2016, at 12:38, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > >>> syntax highlighting does not work, critics its keep looping forever with "Updating critics..." message. I have to minimise and restore the nautlius window to get back syntax highlighting for one method then the next method i have to do the same. >> >> syntax highlighting is because there is a new somekind experimental AST based highlighter. > > What would be nice is that when we push something in the release there is a real support behind. > It took us three months of work with frank to get rubric used. Then the last glitches are just because > we do not want syntax hi in certain parts. > Slow syntax highlighting is not due to the new one but due to changes related to rubric. It gets a bit hard to follow these discussionsâ¦. could people not instead use their time and energy to add issue tracker entries and (especially) comment on existing ones? Marcus

Jan. 16, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic is super slow

by stepharo

>> syntax highlighting does not work, critics its keep looping forever >> with "Updating critics..." message. I have to minimise and restore >> the nautlius window to get back syntax highlighting for one method >> then the next method i have to do the same. > > syntax highlighting is because there is a new somekind experimental > AST based highlighter. What would be nice is that when we push something in the release there is a real support behind. It took us three months of work with frank to get rubric used. Then the last glitches are just because we do not want syntax hi in certain parts. Stef > We want to finish it, but weâll seeâ¦ > > Esteban >

Jan. 16, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic is super slow

by Dimitris Chloupis

Take your time, no rush, Pharo 4 is fine for me. It even has Spotter that I use a lot. More than enough for my needs. I was using Pharo 5 to report back issues and problems but I just cant work with it anymore. So I will sit here and wait here, using a stable version that I know works very well for me without complaining about anything that brakes using a version I should not be using for production code anyway. On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:04 PM Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > yes, there is a problem in the cleanup of freetype fonts. > thatâs not a vm bug, but it started to happen very often after migrating. > > Is in my high priority TODO list, right after a couple of FFI tweaks :S > > Esteban > > On 16 Jan 2016, at 11:54, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > ok if I open a nautilus window and then I save the image , it does not > create this error > > o_O > > crazy stuff > > :D > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:51 PM Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > <Screen Shot 2016-01-16 at 12.47.59.png> >> >> yes even with stable VM is a mess, new problem >> >> I got pharo with this >> >> wget -O- get.pharo.org/alpha+vm | bash >> >> downloads fines, loads my libraries fine with my startup script as soon >> as i try to save the image the above happens >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:43 PM Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Esteban I also get doSemantics: errors , I have been getting way way >>> back before Spur while trying to use shortcuts. It was messing also with >>> the rendering of the method list in Nautilus when there were too many >>> methods, it turned to a red box of death. So I am not convinced my problem >>> are just VM related but you can correct me if I am wrong. >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:41 PM Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 16 Jan 2016, at 11:27, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> yes thanks Esteban I am back to Pharo 4 and I am fine :) >>>> >>>> >>>> you do not need to go back to Pharo 4â¦ just downloading stable VM is >>>> enough :) >>>> (and I need people helping me to find the bugs on Pharo 5, spur, FFI, >>>> etc. *before* release :P) >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> Esteban >>>> >>>> >>>> will stick with it, till the release of Pharo 5. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 16 Jan 2016, at 01:01, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <Screen Shot 2016-01-16 at 00.38.10.png> >>>>> >>>>> and by the way menus on latest pharo 5 are broken >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> not the menus >>>>> there is a problem with WideString and string primitives in latest >>>>> spur vm. >>>>> in the mean time you can download stable instead latest and you will >>>>> be ok. >>>>> >>>>> Esteban >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:29 AM Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 2016-01-16 0:11 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2016-01-16 0:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > On 15 Jan 2016, at 23:30, Dimitris Chloupis < >>>>>>>> kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > taskbar was the problem, damn pharo gui is a huge pain in the hat. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How so ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to now that too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Btw, this is interesting too: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> WorldState debugShowDamage:true. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And look all the flashing in a nautilus and or playground window. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hm, I think this was my fault. The fix for >>>>>> 17201 >>>>>> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17201/Marking-Diffs-broken-in-Pharo5> >>>>>> Marking Diffs broken in Pharo5 >>>>>> wasn't good. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:32 PM Dimitris Chloupis < >>>>>>>> kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> > ITs not the step, I removed the step as I said in my first post. >>>>>>>> Still 30% cpu consumption >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > The images are PNGs and RGBA , 8bit >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:54 PM Hilaire <hilaire(a)drgeo.eu> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > It depends on what you are doing in a step, but 1s step should >>>>>>>> not hurt. >>>>>>>> > May be the problem is somewhere else. >>>>>>>> > With DrGeo, I noted Athens is faster to BitBlt with bitmap >>>>>>>> operations >>>>>>>> > (in my case, only scaling and displaying a From in a DrGeo >>>>>>>> canvas). >>>>>>>> > Also, do your bitmaps come with 32 bits depth? >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>>> > Dr. Geo >>>>>>>> > http://drgeo.eu >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> â >>>>> >>>>>

Jan. 16, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic is super slow

by Esteban Lorenzano

> On 16 Jan 2016, at 11:59, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > syntax highlighting does not work, critics its keep looping forever with "Updating critics..." message. I have to minimise and restore the nautlius window to get back syntax highlighting for one method then the next method i have to do the same. syntax highlighting is because there is a new somekind experimental AST based highlighter. We want to finish it, but weâll seeâ¦ Esteban > > Big Nope.... > > Back I go to Pharo 4. Pharo 5 simply does not like me :D > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:54 PM Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: > > ok if I open a nautilus window and then I save the image , it does not create this error > > o_O > > crazy stuff > > :D > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:51 PM Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: > <Screen Shot 2016-01-16 at 12.47.59.png> > > yes even with stable VM is a mess, new problem > > I got pharo with this > > wget -O- get.pharo.org/alpha+vm <http://get.pharo.org/alpha+vm> | bash > > downloads fines, loads my libraries fine with my startup script as soon as i try to save the image the above happens > > > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:43 PM Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: > Esteban I also get doSemantics: errors , I have been getting way way back before Spur while trying to use shortcuts. It was messing also with the rendering of the method list in Nautilus when there were too many methods, it turned to a red box of death. So I am not convinced my problem are just VM related but you can correct me if I am wrong. > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:41 PM Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: >> On 16 Jan 2016, at 11:27, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> yes thanks Esteban I am back to Pharo 4 and I am fine :) > > you do not need to go back to Pharo 4â¦ just downloading stable VM is enough :) > (and I need people helping me to find the bugs on Pharo 5, spur, FFI, etc. *before* release :P) > > cheers, > Esteban > >> >> will stick with it, till the release of Pharo 5. >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> On 16 Jan 2016, at 01:01, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> <Screen Shot 2016-01-16 at 00.38.10.png> >>> >>> and by the way menus on latest pharo 5 are broken >> >> not the menus >> there is a problem with WideString and string primitives in latest spur vm. >> in the mean time you can download stable instead latest and you will be ok. >> >> Esteban >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:29 AM Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com <mailto:nicolaihess@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> 2016-01-16 0:11 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com <mailto:nicolaihess@gmail.com>>: >>> >>> >>> 2016-01-16 0:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu <mailto:sven@stfx.eu>>: >>> >>> > On 15 Jan 2016, at 23:30, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > taskbar was the problem, damn pharo gui is a huge pain in the hat. >>> >>> How so ? >>> >>> I would like to now that too. >>> >>> Btw, this is interesting too: >>> >>> WorldState debugShowDamage:true. >>> >>> And look all the flashing in a nautilus and or playground window. >>> >>> Hm, I think this was my fault. The fix for >>> 17201 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17201/Marking-Diffs-broken-in-Pharo5> Marking Diffs broken in Pharo5 >>> wasn't good. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:32 PM Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > ITs not the step, I removed the step as I said in my first post. Still 30% cpu consumption >>> > >>> > The images are PNGs and RGBA , 8bit >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:54 PM Hilaire <hilaire(a)drgeo.eu <mailto:hilaire@drgeo.eu>> wrote: >>> > It depends on what you are doing in a step, but 1s step should not hurt. >>> > May be the problem is somewhere else. >>> > With DrGeo, I noted Athens is faster to BitBlt with bitmap operations >>> > (in my case, only scaling and displaying a From in a DrGeo canvas). >>> > Also, do your bitmaps come with 32 bits depth? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Dr. Geo >>> > http://drgeo.eu <http://drgeo.eu/> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> â

Jan. 16, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Morphic is super slow

by Esteban Lorenzano

yes, there is a problem in the cleanup of freetype fonts. thatâs not a vm bug, but it started to happen very often after migrating. Is in my high priority TODO list, right after a couple of FFI tweaks :S Esteban > On 16 Jan 2016, at 11:54, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > ok if I open a nautilus window and then I save the image , it does not create this error > > o_O > > crazy stuff > > :D > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:51 PM Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: > <Screen Shot 2016-01-16 at 12.47.59.png> > > yes even with stable VM is a mess, new problem > > I got pharo with this > > wget -O- get.pharo.org/alpha+vm <http://get.pharo.org/alpha+vm> | bash > > downloads fines, loads my libraries fine with my startup script as soon as i try to save the image the above happens > > > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:43 PM Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: > Esteban I also get doSemantics: errors , I have been getting way way back before Spur while trying to use shortcuts. It was messing also with the rendering of the method list in Nautilus when there were too many methods, it turned to a red box of death. So I am not convinced my problem are just VM related but you can correct me if I am wrong. > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:41 PM Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: >> On 16 Jan 2016, at 11:27, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> yes thanks Esteban I am back to Pharo 4 and I am fine :) > > you do not need to go back to Pharo 4â¦ just downloading stable VM is enough :) > (and I need people helping me to find the bugs on Pharo 5, spur, FFI, etc. *before* release :P) > > cheers, > Esteban > >> >> will stick with it, till the release of Pharo 5. >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> On 16 Jan 2016, at 01:01, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> <Screen Shot 2016-01-16 at 00.38.10.png> >>> >>> and by the way menus on latest pharo 5 are broken >> >> not the menus >> there is a problem with WideString and string primitives in latest spur vm. >> in the mean time you can download stable instead latest and you will be ok. >> >> Esteban >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:29 AM Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com <mailto:nicolaihess@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> 2016-01-16 0:11 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess(a)gmail.com <mailto:nicolaihess@gmail.com>>: >>> >>> >>> 2016-01-16 0:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu <mailto:sven@stfx.eu>>: >>> >>> > On 15 Jan 2016, at 23:30, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > taskbar was the problem, damn pharo gui is a huge pain in the hat. >>> >>> How so ? >>> >>> I would like to now that too. >>> >>> Btw, this is interesting too: >>> >>> WorldState debugShowDamage:true. >>> >>> And look all the flashing in a nautilus and or playground window. >>> >>> Hm, I think this was my fault. The fix for >>> 17201 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17201/Marking-Diffs-broken-in-Pharo5> Marking Diffs broken in Pharo5 >>> wasn't good. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:32 PM Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com <mailto:kilon.alios@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > ITs not the step, I removed the step as I said in my first post. Still 30% cpu consumption >>> > >>> > The images are PNGs and RGBA , 8bit >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:54 PM Hilaire <hilaire(a)drgeo.eu <mailto:hilaire@drgeo.eu>> wrote: >>> > It depends on what you are doing in a step, but 1s step should not hurt. >>> > May be the problem is somewhere else. >>> > With DrGeo, I noted Athens is faster to BitBlt with bitmap operations >>> > (in my case, only scaling and displaying a From in a DrGeo canvas). >>> > Also, do your bitmaps come with 32 bits depth? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Dr. Geo >>> > http://drgeo.eu <http://drgeo.eu/> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> â

Jan. 16, 2016