- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] is there a better way to browse the mail archives than

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

This http://forum.world.st/Pharo-f1294836.html ? On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Torsten Bergmann <astares(a)gmx.de> wrote: > >is there a better way to browse the mail archives > > > http://lists.pharo.org => select the list and click on "Archives" > >

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Spec] CheckBoxModel>>enabled: does not work?

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

Indeed, it is broken https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17754/CheckBoxModel-RadioButtonModel-igno… I don't know how this is done in morphic, but you could probably hack it via buttonModel whenBuiltDo: [ :w | w widget someMorphicMessageSend ] (or something like that) On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Julien Delplanque <julien(a)tamere.eu> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to disable a CheckBoxModel using #enabled: method does not > works. > > Any idea? > > Regards, > > Julien > >

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Moose-dev] Re: Call for action for Roassal

by Alexandre Bergel

Hi Peter! Any news about the GraphViz layout? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > On Feb 24, 2016, at 6:35 AM, Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Anne Etien <anne.etien(a)univ-lille1.fr <mailto:anne.etien@univ-lille1.fr>> wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > In a wonderful world, I would like: > - a real graph layout (like in graphviz) that can take into account around hundred nodes and several hundred of edges and place the nodes in order to see something. Currently, I have to use the circle layout and it looks strange. > > Unfortunately making real graph layouts is really hard issueâ¦ I've wrote my bachelor thesis about this and didn't get very far; it's bit of a nightmare if you don't have good foundations. :'( > > In any case, I wrote a simpler layout delegator in Roassal that delegates the layouting to graphviz and it works reasonably well, so I could probably add it to Roassal (you however need graphviz installed and it would add another dependency to Roassal, which I'm not so keen on). > > Maybe also OGDF (http://ogdf.net/doku.php <http://ogdf.net/doku.php>) could be used if you are ok with GPLâ¦ they have their own graph format so there could be some interaction. > > Peter

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] left-pad.io

by Esteban A. Maringolo

2016-03-25 8:55 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: >> On 24 Mar 2016, at 22:25, phil(a)highoctane.be wrote: >> Internet, the great CO2 production device. >> http://www.internetlivestats.com/watch/co2-emissions/ > It feels to me that those calculations are always too simple, and wrong as well. Multiplying maximum server power usage times maximum dirty electricity generation CO2 emission gives overstated results. There is a huge drive for lower power consumption (because electricity in a data center is VERY expensive), to move datacenters to cooler areas, to power them with clean, renewable electricity. Ask bitcoin miners about getting efficient computing. :) > BTW, it seems that I did not fully understand the story about the left-pad.io library, here is one writeup: > > Rage-quit: Coder unpublished 17 lines of JavaScript and âbroke the Internetâ > Dispute over module name in npm registry became giant headache for developers > http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/03/rage-quit-coder-unpub… > > Quite interesting & food for thought. It's interesting, and that's a difference with Debian's apt-get; while npm is both the tool and, mostly, an unique the registry, apt-get decouples that so you can have your custom deb sources. Pharo way of dealing with dependencies is good, but we lack the packaging system and convenient CLI. Dale's tODE is a good example of something done in that direction. Regards, Esteban A. Maringolo

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] is there a better way to browse the mail archives than

by Dominique B.

Hi all,Dear Stepharo, I recenty discovered MarkMAil.http://markmail.org/search/list:fr.inria.gforge.lists.pharo-projec… Â Â Â Â Dominique Bordereaux Le Dimanche 27 mars 2016 12h48, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> a Ã©crit : Hi I would like the reread the thread on || and pragmas and I have difficulty using the interface of http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html is there a better way to browse the mail archives it? Stef

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] How to rewrite self should: into self assert:

by stepharo

Le 28/3/16 10:41, Yuriy Tymchuk a Ã©crit : > I have not seen that you gave this to me :). Just make sure that itâs > in Pharo, and QA should pick it up. > > Cheers. > Uko > >> On 28 Mar 2016, at 10:31, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr >> <mailto:stepharo@free.fr>> wrote: >> >> I gave this rule and assert: = -> assert: equals: to yuriy for >> inclusion in QA >> >> >> Le 27/3/16 21:04, Denis Kudriashov a Ã©crit : >>> >>> 2016-03-27 20:45 GMT+02:00 Mark Rizun <mrizun(a)gmail.com >>> <mailto:mrizun@gmail.com>>: >>> >>> Hi, Denis. >>> >>> We discussed this with Stef, created the rule for such >>> transformation and successfully applied it to many methods :) >>> The rule basically is: >>> self should: [ ``@object ] --> self assert: ``@object >>> >>> >>> Nice. Thank's >> >

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo days 2016, driving from the Netherlands

by Stephan Eggermont

On 28-03-16 13:39, Jan van de Sandt wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > I would have been interested. But I ordered my train ticket last night. Ah well, I should have been a bit faster. Stephan

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo days 2016, driving from the Netherlands

by Jan van de Sandt

Hi Stephan, I would have been interested. But I ordered my train ticket last night. Jan. On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > I've been looking at options to get to Namur from the Netherlands. > My current plans are to drive by car from Den Bosch on thursday > morning, and drive back friday evening, as it would be twice as > fast as going by public transport. Anyone else from the netherlands > going in that direction? Or want to share a ride? > > Stephan Eggermont > > >

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] is there a better way to browse the mail archives than

by stepharo

thanks ben yes I thought the same :) Le 28/3/16 10:41, Ben Coman a Ã©crit : > A non-alphabetic "||" will always be awkward to search on using any > online service. > As Torsten indicated, the best bet is to download and unzip the > archives and search locally. So for a challenge I thought I'd try... > > >From http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/ > downloaded files back to 2014-Aug > $ gzip -d * > $ grep -n -C 10 \|\| * | grep -i pragma > > 2015-February.txt-19513-Really interesting discussion. I like pragmas > but this is interesting to > 2015-February.txt-19516-> non-obvious. Whereas pragmas, because they > are in-your-face in the > 2015-February.txt-19652-> The good old finder has a pragmas search > mode which allows for a bit > 2015-February.txt-19653-> of discoverability (pragma users), but it > doesn't link to the code > 2015-February.txt-19654-> exploiting the pragmas. > 2015-February.txt-22227-up my mind and fully appreciate pragmas. > 2015-February.txt-23562-(*) i.e. similar to C pragmas > > Plugging "I like pragmas but this is interesting to" (with quotes) > into the search at [1] found [2] > > [1] http://forum.world.st/ > [2] http://forum.world.st/-td4803298i40.html#a4804240 > > HTH > cheers -ben > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 6:47 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> Hi >> >> I would like the reread the thread on || and pragmas and I have difficulty >> using the interface of >> http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >> is there a better way to browse the mail archives it? >> >> Stef >> >

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] is there a better way to browse the mail archives than

by Ben Coman

A non-alphabetic "||" will always be awkward to search on using any online service. As Torsten indicated, the best bet is to download and unzip the archives and search locally. So for a challenge I thought I'd try... >From http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/ downloaded files back to 2014-Aug $ gzip -d * $ grep -n -C 10 \|\| * | grep -i pragma 2015-February.txt-19513-Really interesting discussion. I like pragmas but this is interesting to 2015-February.txt-19516-> non-obvious. Whereas pragmas, because they are in-your-face in the 2015-February.txt-19652-> The good old finder has a pragmas search mode which allows for a bit 2015-February.txt-19653-> of discoverability (pragma users), but it doesn't link to the code 2015-February.txt-19654-> exploiting the pragmas. 2015-February.txt-22227-up my mind and fully appreciate pragmas. 2015-February.txt-23562-(*) i.e. similar to C pragmas Plugging "I like pragmas but this is interesting to" (with quotes) into the search at [1] found [2] [1] http://forum.world.st/ [2] http://forum.world.st/-td4803298i40.html#a4804240 HTH cheers -ben On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 6:47 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Hi > > I would like the reread the thread on || and pragmas and I have difficulty > using the interface of > http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html > is there a better way to browse the mail archives it? > > Stef >

March 28, 2016