- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

NBSQLite on Moose 5.1 connection problems

by Offray Vladimir Luna CÃ¡rdenas

Hi, We have been dealing with a pretty strange and awkward problem in our workshops regarding the NBSQlite package and Moose 5.1 interaction. Some times it works, most times it doesn't, specially when I'm in the workshop. My solution was to unzip the sqlite package for the platform, copy sqlite3 as libsqlite3.so in the "bin/" directory of the platform and it worked (last week). Yesterday I tried the same in our workshop and if failed again even in my local installation. I tried copying and renaming (as "sqlite3.so", "libsqlite3.so") and put it where the moose image lives ("shared/") without any success. Is the biggest frustration in our workshops and we need to export as csv and read manually each useful query result in SQLite... and I can made sense of the error trace or why this error is happening. Monticello reports NBSQLite3-TorstenBergmann.26. Any pointer on how to solve it in a reliable way is welcomed. Here is the error log, while executing http://ws.stfx.eu/POQCW0NVKZJN: NBFFICallout(Object)>>error: NBFFICallout>>generateCall:module: [ :gen | gen callType: conv; sender: context; parseOptions: options; generateCall: functionSignature module: moduleNameOrHandle ] in NBFFICalloutAPI>>function:module: in Block: [ :gen | ... [ bytes := aBlock value: (self newForMethod: method) ] in NBFFICallout class(NBNativeCodeGen class)>>generateCode:andRetry: in Block: [ bytes := aBlock value: (self newForMethod: metho...etc... BlockClosure>>on:do: NBRecursionDetect class>>in:during: NBFFICallout class(NBNativeCodeGen class)>>generateCode:andRetry: NBFFICallout class(NBNativeCodeGen class)>>handleFailureIn:nativeCode: NBFFICalloutAPI>>function:module: NBSQLite3FFI(Object)>>nbCall:module: NBSQLite3FFI>>apiOpen:via: NBSQLite3FFI>>open:via: NBSQLite3Connection(NBSQLite3BaseConnection)>>open NBSQLite3Connection class(NBSQLite3BaseConnection class)>>openOn: UndefinedObject>>DoIt OpalCompiler>>evaluate RubSmalltalkEditor>>evaluate:andDo: RubSmalltalkEditor>>highlightEvaluateAndDo: [ textMorph textArea editor highlightEvaluateAndDo: ann action. textMorph shoutStyler style: textMorph text ] in [ textMorph textArea handleEdit: [ textMorph textArea editor highlightEvaluateAndDo: ann action. textMorph shoutStyler style: textMorph text ] ] in GLMMorphicPharoPlaygroundRenderer(GLMMorphicPharoCodeRenderer)>>actOnHighlightAndEvaluate: in Block: [ ... RubEditingArea(RubAbstractTextArea)>>handleEdit: [ textMorph textArea handleEdit: [ textMorph textArea editor highlightEvaluateAndDo: ann action. textMorph shoutStyler style: textMorph text ] ] in GLMMorphicPharoPlaygroundRenderer(GLMMorphicPharoCodeRenderer)>>actOnHighlightAndEvaluate: in Block: [ ... WorldState>>runStepMethodsIn: WorldMorph>>runStepMethods WorldState>>doOneCycleNowFor: WorldState>>doOneCycleFor: WorldMorph>>doOneCycle [ [ World doOneCycle. Processor yield. false ] whileFalse: [ ] ] in MorphicUIManager>>spawnNewProcess in Block: [ ... [ self value. Processor terminateActive ] in BlockClosure>>newProcess in Block: [ ... Cheers, Offray

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Roassal2 on Ubuntu 64

by Damien Cassou

Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> writes: > $ sudo apt-get install libcairo2:i386 > > Or is there anything more to be done? you should tell your Ubuntu users to use the ubuntu ppa: http://pharo.org/gnu-linux-installation -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Running Pharo 5 on Ubuntu 16.04

by Damien Cassou

nacho <0800nacho(a)gmail.com> writes: > I'm having some issues in trying to run Pharo 5 in Ubuntu 16.04 > 1) I've downloaded the sources, images and latest vm from pharo site > 2) Unpacked everything into a directory ~/Applications/Pharo > 3) chowned and chmoded everythin in that file you should probably use the Pharo Ubuntu PPA : http://pharo.org/gnu-linux-installation -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Spotter Survey

by Offray Vladimir Luna CÃ¡rdenas

Hi some constructive comments on the survey: - I agreed with Nicolai: "before what?" I have chosen "Yes" supposing that is before filling out the survey. - I also think that the scale for evaluating relevancy on Spotter features is not the adequate, because some features are not shades of irrelevant or useful, but used accordingly to necessity and discoverability. In my case I don't use them because my use case don't let me discover that uses (which is kind of an irony: improving the own discoverability of a tool used for "external" discoverability). I have chosen "I don't know this feature" but sometimes I refer to I know them sometimes but is not clear how to pass from my use case to them. Cheers, Offray On 29/03/16 04:02, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > 2016-03-29 10:17 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com > <mailto:chisvasileandrei@gmail.com>>: > > Hello everybody, > > We are conducting a small survey about Spotter. > It would help us if you would complete the survey at: > http://spotter.limequery.com/index.php/216683/lang-en > > We will use the data from this survey both in a research tasks and > to help us to further improve Spotter. > The survey should take you less than 5 minutes to complete. > > Thanks for your help! > > > Hi, some questions are unclear to me: > > What does this question means: > "Did you use Spotter before?" > > before what? > Before I took this survey? > > The answers to > "I find the following features from Spotter: " > "Sometimes useful" "Sometimes irrelevant" aren't exclusions. > > For the dive-in feature, I would answer something like: > I find the feature useful, but it often gives irrelevant results. > > > "How many different kinds of searches (e.g., senders, implementors, > classes â¦) are you performing using Spotter?" > > I often search for classes and methods, and I think most people only > do this. What are "more than 10" kind of searches? > > > Cheers, > Andrei > >

March 29, 2016

Additional Pomodoro features

by Torsten Bergmann

Stephan Eggermont wrote: >Couldn't write to the repo, Added you as contributor >and not everything is as clean as it should be then clean it up ;) Bye T.

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Moose-dev] [Pharo-dev] Spotter Survey

by Alexandre Bergel

> "How many different kinds of searches (e.g., senders, implementors, classes â¦) are you performing using Spotter?" > > I often search for classes and methods, and I think most people only do this. What are "more than 10" kind of searches? I am looking for Roassal examples, searching in previous playground contents, searching in the catalog, looking for implementor scoped in a particular class or packages, â¦ Alexandre

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Spotter Survey

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

> > I often search for classes and methods, and I think most people only do > this. What are "more than 10" kind of searches? GTSpotter>>spotter*For: (and I use 9-ish of them atm, although classes & methods are still the primary use case) But the discoverability is not great. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Martin BÃ¤hr < mbaehr(a)email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Excerpts from Nicolai Hess's message of 2016-03-29 11:02:19 +0200: > > Hi, some questions are unclear to me: > > > > What does this question means: > > "Did you use Spotter before?" > > > > before what? > > Before I took this survey? > > try answering "no" and see what happens ;-) > > > For the dive-in feature, I would answer something like: > > I find the feature useful, but it often gives irrelevant results. > > so the feature itself is not irrelevant, but the results are... > > greetings, martin. > > -- > eKita - the online platform for your entire academic > life > -- > chief engineer > eKita.co > pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net > societyserver.org > secretary > beijinglug.org > mentor > fossasia.org > foresight developer foresightlinux.org > realss.com > unix sysadmin > Martin BÃ¤hr working in china > http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ > >

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Additional Pomodoro features

by Stephan Eggermont

On 29-03-16 10:38, phil-xfc0EfG9EVpKErsXAC5tcw(a)public.gmane.org wrote: > Still not able to send to Smalltalkhub? Done Stephan

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Metacello] about required list

by Christophe Demarey

> Le 28 mars 2016 Ã 22:36, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs(a)gemtalksystems.com> a Ã©crit : > > Stef, > > You don't need to repeat packages in the requires statement. Requiring 'Math-DistributionGamma' is sufficient to pick up 'Math-Core', 'Math-DHB-Numerical', 'Math-Series', and 'Math-Core-Distribution' as requirements as well â¦ . Indeed but it is a bad practice. If 'Math-DistributionBetaâ has direct dependencies to 'Math-Core', 'Math-DHB-Numerical', 'Math-Series', and 'Math-Core-Distributionâ, they should be expressed. Else, you will end up with a configuration with missing requirements. ex: if I update 'Math-DistributionGammaâ and do no depend anymore on 'Math-Seriesâ for example. I will remove 'Math-Seriesâ from 'Math-DistributionGammaâ requirements. Then, I end with a missing dependency for 'Math-DistributionBetaâ. What you could do is to define a group with 'Math-Core', 'Math-DHB-Numerical', 'Math-Series', and 'Math-Core-Distributionâ if it makes senses for your business logic. Then, both 'Math-DistributionGammaâ and 'Math-DistributionBetaâ could add this group as requirement. Note that factorization of dependencies is not always a good idea. If dependencies you want to factorize have nothing to do all together, itâs better to avoid to group them because they will change many times. Christophe

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Spotter Survey

by Martin BÃ¤hr

Excerpts from Nicolai Hess's message of 2016-03-29 11:02:19 +0200: > Hi, some questions are unclear to me: > > What does this question means: > "Did you use Spotter before?" > > before what? > Before I took this survey? try answering "no" and see what happens ;-) > For the dive-in feature, I would answer something like: > I find the feature useful, but it often gives irrelevant results. so the feature itself is not irrelevant, but the results are... greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org secretary beijinglug.org mentor fossasia.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin BÃ¤hr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/

March 29, 2016