- Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 5 and Seaside

by Mark Bratcher

I'm running Pharo 5 on Windows. When I installed Seaside 3, I just used the instructions given for Gofer (entered in the Playground and executed there). I downloaded the base package: Gofer new url:'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Seaside/MetacelloConfigurations/main'; package: 'ConfigurationOfSeaside3'; load. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfSeaside3) project version: #stable) load. I also tried the alternative Gofer instructions shown, and they also worked without dependency error. So depending upon how you actually did your load of Seaside 3, maybe you didn't pull in all the dependent packages. Mark On 6/19/2016 4:31 AM, jtuchel(a)objektfabrik.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > I just downloaded Pharo 5 from pharo.org clicked on the MacOS X > button), opened the Catalog Browser and wanted to load / install > Seaside. I must admit I didn't read anything before I did... ;-) > > Here are a few remarks: > > * Download and installation on OS X El Capitan went smoothly, just > the usual security warning ion first opening. Since I know Pharo > is no malware ( ;-) ), this was not an issue > * There are several entries for Seaside, most of them warn me they > are not tested/blessed for Pharo 5. They do not have a "Pharo 5" > tag. So they could possibly be ommitted in this default view? > * The "Seaside 3" entry seems to be the suitable one, but fails with > "This package depends on the following classes: > ContextPart" > * it is not really obvious what the difference between "install > stable version" and "install stable version and create group" is. > The word group is something without any meaning in the context of > Smalltalk to me... I clicked on the top-most entry just because I > thought it's first in the menu for a reason. > > So I didn't really get far in this Sunday-morning-experiment :-( > > Joachim > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchelmailto:jtuchel@objektfabrik.de > Fliederweg 1http://www.objektfabrik.de > D-71640 Ludwigsburghttp://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com > Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1 >

June 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 5 and Seaside

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, thanks for the feedbackâ¦ yes we are in the process of cleaning the catalog, to make thing easy. In the case of Seaside, the problem is that configuration convention name changed these years and then there are older and newer configurations coexisting (30, 3, etc.). As you correctly guessed, correct one is Seaside3. About the catalog, yes, probably is not clear at allâ¦ it refers to âcreate a group in browserâ, which is handy for install projects and see them all reunitedâ¦ cheers, Esteban > On 19 Jun 2016, at 10:31, jtuchel(a)objektfabrik.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > I just downloaded Pharo 5 from pharo.org clicked on the MacOS X button), opened the Catalog Browser and wanted to load / install Seaside. I must admit I didn't read anything before I did... ;-) > Here are a few remarks: > > Download and installation on OS X El Capitan went smoothly, just the usual security warning ion first opening. Since I know Pharo is no malware ( ;-) ), this was not an issue > There are several entries for Seaside, most of them warn me they are not tested/blessed for Pharo 5. They do not have a "Pharo 5" tag. So they could possibly be ommitted in this default view? > The "Seaside 3" entry seems to be the suitable one, but fails with "This package depends on the following classes: > ContextPart" > it is not really obvious what the difference between "install stable version" and "install stable version and create group" is. The word group is something without any meaning in the context of Smalltalk to me... I clicked on the top-most entry just because I thought it's first in the menu for a reason. > So I didn't really get far in this Sunday-morning-experiment :-( > > Joachim > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchel mailto:jtuchel@objektfabrik.de <mailto:jtuchel@objektfabrik.de> > Fliederweg 1 http://www.objektfabrik.de <http://www.objektfabrik.de/> > D-71640 Ludwigsburg http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com <http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com/> > Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1 >

June 19, 2016

R: Pharo 5 and Seaside

by francesco agati

Try this last message http://forum.world.st/Seaside-3-1-and-3-2-in-Pharo-5-td4885580.html ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "jtuchel(a)objektfabrik.de" <jtuchel(a)objektfabrik.de> Inviato: â19/â06/â2016 10:32 A: "Any question about pharo is welcome" <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> Oggetto: [Pharo-users] Pharo 5 and Seaside Hi, I just downloaded Pharo 5 from pharo.org clicked on the MacOS X button), opened the Catalog Browser and wanted to load / install Seaside. I must admit I didn't read anything before I did... ;-) Here are a few remarks: Download and installation on OS X El Capitan went smoothly, just the usual security warning ion first opening. Since I know Pharo is no malware ( ;-) ), this was not an issue There are several entries for Seaside, most of them warn me they are not tested/blessed for Pharo 5. They do not have a "Pharo 5" tag. So they could possibly be ommitted in this default view? The "Seaside 3" entry seems to be the suitable one, but fails with "This package depends on the following classes: ContextPart" it is not really obvious what the difference between "install stable version" and "install stable version and create group" is. The word group is something without any meaning in the context of Smalltalk to me... I clicked on the top-most entry just because I thought it's first in the menu for a reason. So I didn't really get far in this Sunday-morning-experiment :-( Joachim -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchel mailto:jtuchel@objektfabrik.de Fliederweg 1 http://www.objektfabrik.de D-71640 Ludwigsburg http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1

June 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] SQLite on multiple images

by Hilaire

Ah neat, make sense indeed. Thanks for the update. Hilaire Le 19/06/2016 10:36, Alistair Grant a Ã©crit : > I don't think it even has to be the same library. My understanding is > that sqlite relies on file locking for write access, so as long as the > file system is locking the file correctly, the db lock will work. > > HTH, > Alistair > > -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu

June 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] SQLite on multiple images

by Hilaire

Hi, What is it exactly? A pool of pre-open connections to a database, to save the connection time and make an application more responsive when doing data operations? Thanks for the update. Hilaire Le 19/06/2016 10:24, stepharo a Ã©crit : > Hi hilaire > > > I do not know if this is the anwser. Now I wanted to let you know that > Olivier developed a session pool for database connexion. > > > Stef -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu

June 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] SQLite on multiple images

by Alistair Grant

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:09:29AM +0200, Hilaire wrote: > I guess as long as the images are executed by a VM linked to the same > SQLite library, the SQLite lock mechanism will work. I will test that. > > Le 16/06/2016 12:19, Hilaire a Ã©crit : > > Hi, > > > > I have a question regarding the use of the same SQLite DB from several > > Pharo images (all running in the same host, but likely on different cores). > > > > Is it safe in this scenario? I mean does lock on write operation > > correctly work? I don't think it even has to be the same library. My understanding is that sqlite relies on file locking for write access, so as long as the file system is locking the file correctly, the db lock will work. HTH, Alistair

June 19, 2016

Pharo 5 and Seaside

by jtuchel＠objektfabrik.de

Hi, I just downloaded Pharo 5 from pharo.org clicked on the MacOS X button), opened the Catalog Browser and wanted to load / install Seaside. I must admit I didn't read anything before I did... ;-) Here are a few remarks: * Download and installation on OS X El Capitan went smoothly, just the usual security warning ion first opening. Since I know Pharo is no malware ( ;-) ), this was not an issue * There are several entries for Seaside, most of them warn me they are not tested/blessed for Pharo 5. They do not have a "Pharo 5" tag. So they could possibly be ommitted in this default view? * The "Seaside 3" entry seems to be the suitable one, but fails with "This package depends on the following classes: ContextPart" * it is not really obvious what the difference between "install stable version" and "install stable version and create group" is. The word group is something without any meaning in the context of Smalltalk to me... I clicked on the top-most entry just because I thought it's first in the menu for a reason. So I didn't really get far in this Sunday-morning-experiment :-( Joachim -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchel mailto:jtuchel@objektfabrik.de Fliederweg 1 http://www.objektfabrik.de D-71640 Ludwigsburg http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1

June 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] SQLite on multiple images

by stepharo

Hi hilaire I do not know if this is the anwser. Now I wanted to let you know that Olivier developed a session pool for database connexion. Stef Le 16/6/16 Ã 12:19, Hilaire a Ã©crit : > Hi, > > I have a question regarding the use of the same SQLite DB from several > Pharo images (all running in the same host, but likely on different cores). > > Is it safe in this scenario? I mean does lock on write operation > correctly work? > > Thanks > > Hilaire >

June 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] SQLite on multiple images

by Hilaire

I guess as long as the images are executed by a VM linked to the same SQLite library, the SQLite lock mechanism will work. I will test that. Le 16/06/2016 12:19, Hilaire a Ã©crit : > Hi, > > I have a question regarding the use of the same SQLite DB from several > Pharo images (all running in the same host, but likely on different cores). > > Is it safe in this scenario? I mean does lock on write operation > correctly work? > > Thanks > > Hilaire -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu

June 19, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Seamless

by stepharo

thanks for the report Denis is on vacation and he will certainly reply to you. Le 18/6/16 Ã 21:45, francescoagati a Ã©crit : > Hi, > i am testing with seamless on pharo 5 and all works really good. the only > problem i see if i try to save the state of the image. if there is a > connection active the vm freeze and stop to work. the only think i can do is > quit and reopen it losing all changes. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Seamless-tp4840907p4901703.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

June 19, 2016