September 2020 - Pharo-users

Re: [Pharo-users] Can it do this way ?

by Roelof Wobben

Sept. 4, 2020

Re: [Pharo-users] Can it do this way ?

by Richard O'Keefe

What part of "return false if there are not exactly 10 characters left after discarding dashes" fails to handle the empty string? A test case for the empty string is is only valuable if the empty string is NOT a special case. On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 22:52, Roelof Wobben <r.wobben(a)home.nl> wrote: > Op 2-9-2020 om 12:38 schreef Richard O'Keefe: > > There is simply no point in "taking the first nine numbers out". > And there shouldn't BE a test for the string being empty, anywhere. > '' '-' '---' and so on should all be handled the same way. > > Oh well, what stops you doing > > digits := aString select: [:each | each ~= $-]. > digits size = 10 ifFalse: [^false]. > lastDigit := digits la ost. > digits := digits copyFrom: 1 to: 9. > ( (lastDigit = $X or: [lastDigit isDigit]) and: [ > digits allSatisfy: #isDigit] > ) ifFalse: [^false]. > > Now my code does not do this, but it is just 16 lines of code with > nothing that it would make sense to extract. > > > > Nothing only that I could not think of this one for myself. > If I do it the TDD way I come more on the way Im currently thinking > > but does this case then be covered > > test14_EmptyIsbn > | result | > result := isbnVerifierCalculator isValidIsbn: ''. > self assert: result equals: false > > and still I have to do the calcualation to see if it's valid. > If I understand the code well I can use the digits variable ? > > > Roelof > > >

Sept. 4, 2020

Re: [Pharo-users] Getting rid of .sources file for deployment

by Smalltalk＠JGFoster.net

> On Sep 3, 2020, at 9:49 AM, Trygve Reenskaug <trygver(a)ifi.uio.no> wrote: > > The .sources file has been optional for as long as I can remember. > Is it OK for list that somebody breaks this tradition? > Trygve Hi Trygve, Iâm not sure what you mean by this question. Are you asking, âIs it acceptable to have code that relies on reflection in order to operate properly?â To this question I would answer âyesâ since some things are easier to do using reflection. Or are you asking, âWould it be better to not have FFI at all until it can be implemented without reflection?â To this question I would answer ânoâ since people that donât want reflection can choose to forego features that require it. Or are you asking, âWould it be nice if someone could do the work to implement FFI without reflection?â To this question I would answer âyes.â Unfortunately, there is a cost involved. So were you asking one of those questions or something else? James

Sept. 3, 2020

Re: [Pharo-users] Getting rid of .sources file for deployment

by Trygve Reenskaug

The .sources file has been optional for as long as I can remember. Is it OK for list that somebody breaks this tradition? Trygve On 2020-08-29 04:49, Esteban Maringolo wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to get rid the .sources file in a deployment scenario? > > I followed this guide [1], but I cannot get rid of the .sources files, > because I'm using PharoADO (which uses PharoCOM) and it uses some > reflection for FFI and for some reason that implies using the .sources > file. I installed the FFICompilerPlugin as per the instructions, but I > don't have a way to tell whether I did in the right place/moment, nor > how to assess its proper installation. > > If such [2] .sources file cannot be removed, what is the criteria for > the lookup, can it be renamed or modified via some parameter/config? > > Thanks! > > [1] https://github.com/pharo-open-documentation/pharo-wiki/blob/master/General/… > [2] Pharo8.0-32bit-0932da8.sources in my case > > > Esteban A. Maringolo > -- /The essence of object orientation is that objects collaborateto achieve a goal. / Trygve Reenskaug mailto: trygver(a)ifi.uio.no <mailto:%20trygver@ifi.uio.no> Morgedalsvn. 5A http://folk.uio.no/trygver/ N-0378 Oslo http://fullOO.info NorwayÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Tel: (+47) 468 58 625

Sept. 3, 2020

Re: [Pharo-users] Can it do this way ?

by Roelof Wobben

Op 2-9-2020 om 12:52 schreef Roelof Wobben via Pharo-users: So no more hints from other people? Roelof

Sept. 3, 2020

Re: [Pharo-users] Rewrite Tool Set in Spec2

by Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer

Hi Stef, we will review this ASAP, and we will back to you soon. Thanks :) Juan P. El jue., 3 sept. 2020 a las 2:22, StÃ©phane Ducasse (< stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>) escribiÃ³: > I loaded latest version in P9 and I cannot open it from the tools menu > > searchForEditor := self newCode > text: DefaultRule new searchFor; > yourself. > > Apparently searchFor is not understood > > S > > On 3 Sep 2020, at 00:49, Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer <juampiboy(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > Greetings to all, > > Sebastian is developing a tool to build and test Rewrite Rules. It is > built on the basis of MatchTool and RewriteTool. I have ported, refactored, > and enhanced these tools to be compatible with Pharo 9 and with Spec2. So, > in this tool you have these tools ported and ready to be used. But also, it > has more tools and more functionalities, all integrated into one in this > new tool. This is technically a set of modular tools that can be used > separately or in suitable conjunction. As the tool is in developing, the > only thing missing is the integration with RewriteTool. The rest of the > tools and functionalities work adequately. So, you can use it just fine. > > You can find a deeper explanation, and the script to install it in my > repository: https://github.com/jordanmontt/RewriteTool-Spec2 > > Any feedback, issue or suggestion is more than welcome. > > Thanks a lot, : ) > Sebastian & Juan Pablo > > > -------------------------------------------- > StÃ©phane Ducasse > http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr / http://www.pharo.org > 03 59 35 87 52 > Assistant: Aurore Dalle > FAX 03 59 57 78 50 > TEL 03 59 35 86 16 > S. Ducasse - Inria > 40, avenue Halley, > Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, BÃ¢t.A, Park Plaza > Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 > France > >

Sept. 3, 2020

Pharo code documentation

by Dario Romano Trussardi

Ciao, i would need to document the code i develop in pharo. Relationships between classes, class instance names, etc. etcâ¦ I think of block diagrams. Quite right ? I wonder if everything is manageable directly in Pharo or if I have to use another program ( which one ? ) Do you have any advice on this issue ? Thanks, Dario

Sept. 3, 2020

Re: [Pharo-users] Rewrite Tool Set in Spec2

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I loaded latest version in P9 and I cannot open it from the tools menu searchForEditor := self newCode text: DefaultRule new searchFor; yourself. Apparently searchFor is not understood S > On 3 Sep 2020, at 00:49, Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer <juampiboy(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Greetings to all, > > Sebastian is developing a tool to build and test Rewrite Rules. It is built on the basis of MatchTool and RewriteTool. I have ported, refactored, and enhanced these tools to be compatible with Pharo 9 and with Spec2. So, in this tool you have these tools ported and ready to be used. But also, it has more tools and more functionalities, all integrated into one in this new tool. This is technically a set of modular tools that can be used separately or in suitable conjunction. As the tool is in developing, the only thing missing is the integration with RewriteTool. The rest of the tools and functionalities work adequately. So, you can use it just fine. > > You can find a deeper explanation, and the script to install it in my repository: https://github.com/jordanmontt/RewriteTool-Spec2 <https://github.com/jordanmontt/RewriteTool-Spec2> > > Any feedback, issue or suggestion is more than welcome. > > Thanks a lot, : ) > Sebastian & Juan Pablo -------------------------------------------- StÃ©phane Ducasse http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr / http://www.pharo.org 03 59 35 87 52 Assistant: Aurore Dalle FAX 03 59 57 78 50 TEL 03 59 35 86 16 S. Ducasse - Inria 40, avenue Halley, Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, BÃ¢t.A, Park Plaza Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 France

Sept. 3, 2020

Re: [Pharo-users] Rewrite Tool Set in Spec2

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Thanks and sorry because Iâm flooded by work. I will check it this evening. S > On 3 Sep 2020, at 00:49, Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer <juampiboy(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Greetings to all, > > Sebastian is developing a tool to build and test Rewrite Rules. It is built on the basis of MatchTool and RewriteTool. I have ported, refactored, and enhanced these tools to be compatible with Pharo 9 and with Spec2. So, in this tool you have these tools ported and ready to be used. But also, it has more tools and more functionalities, all integrated into one in this new tool. This is technically a set of modular tools that can be used separately or in suitable conjunction. As the tool is in developing, the only thing missing is the integration with RewriteTool. The rest of the tools and functionalities work adequately. So, you can use it just fine. > > You can find a deeper explanation, and the script to install it in my repository: https://github.com/jordanmontt/RewriteTool-Spec2 <https://github.com/jordanmontt/RewriteTool-Spec2> > > Any feedback, issue or suggestion is more than welcome. > > Thanks a lot, : ) > Sebastian & Juan Pablo -------------------------------------------- StÃ©phane Ducasse http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr / http://www.pharo.org 03 59 35 87 52 Assistant: Aurore Dalle FAX 03 59 57 78 50 TEL 03 59 35 86 16 S. Ducasse - Inria 40, avenue Halley, Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, BÃ¢t.A, Park Plaza Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 France

Sept. 3, 2020

Rewrite Tool Set in Spec2

by Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer

Greetings to all, Sebastian is developing a tool to build and test Rewrite Rules. It is built on the basis of MatchTool and RewriteTool. I have ported, refactored, and enhanced these tools to be compatible with Pharo 9 and with Spec2. So, in this tool you have these tools ported and ready to be used. But also, it has more tools and more functionalities, all integrated into one in this new tool. This is technically a set of modular tools that can be used separately or in suitable conjunction. As the tool is in developing, the only thing missing is the integration with RewriteTool. The rest of the tools and functionalities work adequately. So, you can use it just fine. You can find a deeper explanation, and the script to install it in my repository: https://github.com/jordanmontt/RewriteTool-Spec2 Any feedback, issue or suggestion is more than welcome. Thanks a lot, : ) Sebastian & Juan Pablo

Sept. 2, 2020